You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2001/08/27 18:40:54 UTC
r->assbackwards
Folks,
I have a two simple questions. One; does assbackwards simply refer to HTTP/0.9?
Two; why are we trying to support HTTP/0.9 in the year 2001? How many pre HTTP/1.0
clients are out there to support?
I know the proxy team would like to remove some XXX deal with r->assbackwards comments
in their code :)
Bill
Re: r->assbackwards
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> writes:
> Two; why are we trying to support HTTP/0.9 in the year 2001? How many pre HTTP/1.0
> clients are out there to support?
telnet :)
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: r->assbackwards
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have a two simple questions. One; does assbackwards simply refer to HTTP/0.9?
yes.
>
> Two; why are we trying to support HTTP/0.9 in the year 2001? How many pre HTTP/1.0
> clients are out there to support?
because we can?
there aren't many, but people probably have lots of random custom code
that uses 0.9 requests to just grab something from a server.