You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/08 15:26:13 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11707) Using Map instead of list in
FailedServers of RpcClient
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090745#comment-14090745 ]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-11707:
-----------------------------------------
You had this issue in production?
The access to the list are protected by a synchronized at the method level, so we don't need the volatile or the concurrentMap (or you could remove the synchronized and check that there is no nasty race conditions).
{code}
+ if (now > latestExpiry) {
+ failedServers.clear();
+ return false;
+ }
{code}
It seems we're going to clear the map all the time if there are no failures. Is it cheap to clear an empty map?
>From a functional point of view, it looks like that the patch is ok.
> Using Map instead of list in FailedServers of RpcClient
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11707
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Liu Shaohui
> Assignee: Liu Shaohui
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-11707-trunk-v1.diff
>
>
> Currently, FailedServers uses a list to record the black list of servers and iterate the list to check if a server is in list. It's not efficient when the list is very large. And the list is not thread safe for the add and iteration operations.
> RpcClient.java#175
> {code}
> // iterate, looking for the search entry and cleaning expired entries
> Iterator<Pair<Long, String>> it = failedServers.iterator();
> while (it.hasNext()) {
> Pair<Long, String> cur = it.next();
> if (cur.getFirst() < now) {
> it.remove();
> } else {
> if (lookup.equals(cur.getSecond())) {
> return true;
> }
> }
> {code}
> A simple change is to change this list to ConcurrentHashMap.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)