You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@phoenix.apache.org by "Viraj Jasani (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/05/15 14:54:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-6420) Wrong result when conditional and regular upserts are passed in the same commit batch

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17345057#comment-17345057 ] 

Viraj Jasani edited comment on PHOENIX-6420 at 5/15/21, 2:53 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I haven't reviewed this patch in detail but the patch applies cleanly to 5.1 (from master) and is nice bug fix to include in 5.1, so let me commit to 5.1 and update fixVersion.


was (Author: vjasani):
I haven't reviewed this patch in detail but the patch applies cleanly to 5.1 (from master), so let me commit to 5.1 and update fixVersion.

> Wrong result when conditional and regular upserts are passed in the same commit batch
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-6420
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6420
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.16.0
>            Reporter: Tanuj Khurana
>            Assignee: Tanuj Khurana
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.17.0, 5.2.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-6420.patch
>
>
> Consider this example:
> {code:java}
> CREATE TABLE T1 (k integer not null primary key, v1 bigint, v2 bigint);
> {code}
> Now consider this batch:
> {code:java}
> UPSERT INTO T1 VALUES(0,0,1);
> UPSERT INTO T1 VALUES(0,1,1) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE v1 = v1 + 2;
> commit();
> {code}
> Expected row state: 0, 2, 1
> Actual: 0, 2, 0
> The value of the column (v2) not updated in the conditional expression remains default. It's value should have been the one set in the regular upsert in the batch.
>  Now, the row exists. Consider another batch of updates
> {code:java}
> UPSERT INTO T1 VALUES(0, 7, 4);
> UPSERT INTO T1 VALUES(0,1,1) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE v1 = v1 + 2;
> commit();
> {code}
> Expected row state: 0,2,1  -> 0, 9, 4
> Actual: 0,2,0 -> 0, 4, 0
> The conditional update expression is evaluated and applied on the row state already committed instead of on the regular update in the same batch. Also, v2 still remains 0 (the default value).
>  Now consider the case of a partial regular update following a conditional update:
> {code:java}
> UPSERT INTO T1 (k, v2) VALUES(0,100) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE v1 = v1 + 2;
> UPSERT INTO T1 (k, v2) VALUES (0,125);
> commit();
> {code}
> Expected row state: 0, 9, 4 -> 0, 11, 125
> Actual: 0, 4, 0 -> 0, 4, 125
> Only the regular update is applied and the conditional update is completely ignored.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)