You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@commons.apache.org by he...@apache.org on 2013/10/21 22:23:53 UTC
svn commit: r1534361 -
/commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml
Author: henning
Date: Mon Oct 21 20:23:53 2013
New Revision: 1534361
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1534361
Log:
add missing changes.xml entries
Modified:
commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml
Modified: commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml?rev=1534361&r1=1534360&r2=1534361&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml (original)
+++ commons/proper/configuration/branches/CONFIGURATION_1_X_MAINTENANCE/src/changes/changes.xml Mon Oct 21 20:23:53 2013
@@ -25,6 +25,30 @@
</properties>
<body>
+ <release version="1.10" date="in SVN"
+ description="Minor bug fixes and improvements">
+ <action dev="henning" type="fix" issue="CONFIGURATION-556">
+ In 1.7 and before, any change to the system properties was
+ immediately reflected in a SystemConfiguration object. This
+ behaviour broke in 1.8 and 1.9. This has been fixed for 1.10.
+ </action>
+ <action dev="henning" type="fix" issue="CONFIGURATION-557">
+ In 1.7 and before, it was possible to pass an arbitrary Map
+ into the constructor of MapConfiguration. With the
+ generification in 1.8, this actually broke and it was no
+ longer possible to pass in e.g. a Map<String, String>
+ because the signature now required a Map<String,
+ Object>. Changing the constructor to accept a
+ Map<String, ?> restores this.
+ </action>
+ <action dev="henning" type="fix" issue="CONFIGURATION-558">
+ Similar to CONFIGURATION-557, the getList(String, List) method
+ was generified to be getList(String, List<Object>) but
+ needs to be getList(String, List<?>) so that code that
+ used a more specific list (such as a List<String>) still
+ compiles against the new API.
+ </action>
+ </release>
<release version="1.9" date="2012-08-08"
description="Minor bug fixes and improvements">
<action dev="oheger" type="update" issue="CONFIGURATION-503" due-to="Tino Sino">