Re: [Apache UIMA 2.3 RC] - Missing Eclipse fragment "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" ?

[Tong Fin <to...@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:

>
>
> Tong Fin wrote:
> > It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment
> > "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by the
> > Deployment Descriptor Editor.
> >
> I see it in eclipsePlugins directory of my test dir built by unzipping
> the uimaj binary distribution, and then the uima-as binary distribution
> (on top of the uimaj base - as is now required).  (It is true it is not
> provided with the base uima bin distribution, but it is provided with
> the uima-as distribution.)
>
OK. Now, I understand why I cannot see it in the base uimaj bin
distribution's "eclipsePlugins" directory unless I overlay uima-as
distribution.

I think we should not put DDE in the base uima bin distribution if we don't
expect it to work in that way. It will create a confusion for the end-users
that only use the base uima bin distribution unless we have a good raison to
put there.

-- Tong

Re: [Apache UIMA 2.3 RC] - Missing Eclipse fragment "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" ?

[Tong Fin <to...@gmail.com>]

Sorry, it is a false alarm !

After repeating the operations and double checking the Eclipse Extension
Sites of my testing Eclipse, I really that there are two copy of uima
related plugins in different extension sites.

The distribution builds of the UIMA RC is CORRECT.

Sorry, Marshall !

-- Tong

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:

>
>
> Tong Fin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Tong Fin wrote:
> >>
> >>> It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment
> >>> "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by
> the
> >>> Deployment Descriptor Editor.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I see it in eclipsePlugins directory of my test dir built by unzipping
> >> the uimaj binary distribution, and then the uima-as binary distribution
> >> (on top of the uimaj base - as is now required).  (It is true it is not
> >> provided with the base uima bin distribution, but it is provided with
> >> the uima-as distribution.)
> >>
> >>
> > OK. Now, I understand why I cannot see it in the base uimaj bin
> > distribution's "eclipsePlugins" directory unless I overlay uima-as
> > distribution.
> >
> > I think we should not put DDE in the base uima bin distribution if we
> don't
> > expect it to work in that way.
>
> Sounds correct.  I looked in the bin distr for base UIMA, in the
> eclipsePlugins folder, and don't see the DDE there - but it sounds like
> you are seeing it somewhere it shouldn't be.  Can you be more speciifc?
>
> -Marshall
>
> > It will create a confusion for the end-users
> > that only use the base uima bin distribution unless we have a good raison
> to
> > put there.
> >
> > -- Tong
> >
> >
>

Re: [Apache UIMA 2.3 RC] - Missing Eclipse fragment "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" ?

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

Tong Fin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Tong Fin wrote:
>>     
>>> It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment
>>> "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by the
>>> Deployment Descriptor Editor.
>>>
>>>       
>> I see it in eclipsePlugins directory of my test dir built by unzipping
>> the uimaj binary distribution, and then the uima-as binary distribution
>> (on top of the uimaj base - as is now required).  (It is true it is not
>> provided with the base uima bin distribution, but it is provided with
>> the uima-as distribution.)
>>
>>     
> OK. Now, I understand why I cannot see it in the base uimaj bin
> distribution's "eclipsePlugins" directory unless I overlay uima-as
> distribution.
>
> I think we should not put DDE in the base uima bin distribution if we don't
> expect it to work in that way. 

Sounds correct.  I looked in the bin distr for base UIMA, in the
eclipsePlugins folder, and don't see the DDE there - but it sounds like
you are seeing it somewhere it shouldn't be.  Can you be more speciifc?

-Marshall

> It will create a confusion for the end-users
> that only use the base uima bin distribution unless we have a good raison to
> put there.
>
> -- Tong
>
>