AnkhSVN 2.0 anyone?

[Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>]

Has anyone looked at AnkhSVN 2.0, the new version of the Subversion
integration for VS?  It's completely integrated now-- no longer an
Addin.

Does this type of integration make sense for NMaven?

ISTR there being some reason that NMaven had to be an Addin.  Was
there, and if so does that restriction still apply?

[1] http://ankhsvn.open.collab.net/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=3794

Thanks,
-- 
Wendy

Re: AnkhSVN 2.0 anyone?

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

They're using the source control (SCC) infrastructure [1].

The alternatives were an add-in or an integration package (VSPackage)  
[2] [3].

It was determined that an integration package would be better, but  
that it might constrain the ability to do it under open source. [4]

It might be a good time to revisit this and consult the legal lists.

Cheers,
Brett

[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb165323(VS.80).aspx

[2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb286994(VS.80).aspx

[3] http://dotnet.sys-con.com/node/105646?page=1

[4] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NMAVEN-13


On 30/07/2008, at 10:16 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:

> Has anyone looked at AnkhSVN 2.0, the new version of the Subversion
> integration for VS?  It's completely integrated now-- no longer an
> Addin.
>
> Does this type of integration make sense for NMaven?
>
> ISTR there being some reason that NMaven had to be an Addin.  Was
> there, and if so does that restriction still apply?
>
> [1] http://ankhsvn.open.collab.net/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=3794
>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Wendy

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: AnkhSVN 2.0 anyone?

[Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>]

Also looks like sandcastle may be back on the menu:
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/07/02/sandcastle-redux.aspx

Shane

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone looked at AnkhSVN 2.0, the new version of the Subversion
>> integration for VS?  It's completely integrated now-- no longer an
>> Addin.
>>
>> Does this type of integration make sense for NMaven?
>>
>> ISTR there being some reason that NMaven had to be an Addin.  Was
>> there, and if so does that restriction still apply?
>
>
> Initially, there were some conditions like MS had to approve the L&F, which
> didn't work. When I talked with Sam Ramji back in February he said that he
> thought that this had been removed but I haven't verified. He was pretty
> keen on trying to get MS licensing in line with Apache License 2.0, where
> possible and said he would work with us if the conditions don't match.
>
> Shane
>
>

Re: AnkhSVN 2.0 anyone?

[Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone looked at AnkhSVN 2.0, the new version of the Subversion
> integration for VS?  It's completely integrated now-- no longer an
> Addin.
>
> Does this type of integration make sense for NMaven?
>
> ISTR there being some reason that NMaven had to be an Addin.  Was
> there, and if so does that restriction still apply?


Initially, there were some conditions like MS had to approve the L&F, which
didn't work. When I talked with Sam Ramji back in February he said that he
thought that this had been removed but I haven't verified. He was pretty
keen on trying to get MS licensing in line with Apache License 2.0, where
possible and said he would work with us if the conditions don't match.

Shane