You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> on 2015/09/29 20:16:48 UTC
Next release?
When would be a good time for our next release?
Here are some dates:
* We aim to release "every month or so".
* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
release on about 10/13.
* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
top-level project as early as 10/21.
Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
to complete?
Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
Julian
[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Most excellent. Thanks! As always, I'll try to be responsive on anything
that needs to be changed to not hold up 1.5.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up. I’ll try to review in the next day or two. I expect we can get most of them into 1.5.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>
>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>
>>> Here are some dates:
>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>> release on about 10/13.
>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>> to complete?
>>>
>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the heads up. I’ll try to review in the next day or two. I expect we can get most of them into 1.5.
Julian
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>
> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>
> - Josh
>
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>
>> Here are some dates:
>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>> release on about 10/13.
>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>
>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>> to complete?
>>
>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>
> I think we can probably check in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
> vote for the release.
>
> --
> Jesús
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" <
> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Julian.
> >
> >I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
> >
> >--
> >Jesús
> >
> >
> >
> >On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Welcome back, Jesus.
> >>
> >>Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
> >>check in the branch for
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
> >>cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
> >>patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
> >>good shape.
> >>
> >>I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
> >>with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
> >>and stable.
> >>
> >>There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
> >>and could go in before a vote.
> >>
> >>Julian
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> >><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
> >>>
> >>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
> I will post another update asap.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jesús
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
> >>>>CALCITE-903
> >>>>
> >>>>Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>> Thanks, Julian.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
> the
> >>>>> patch being out of date.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Julian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
> if that
> >>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Maryann
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
> >>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
> wasn't
> >>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
> date
> >>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
OK, master is closed. Thanks everybody for the last push to the release!
We will start the vote in a few.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 11/6/15, 8:51 AM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>I got the 911 PR from Jinfeng, reviewed and tested, and it's in.
>Thanks, Jinfeng!
>
>Jesus,
>
>We're good to go for RC 1.
>
>Draft release notes: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/tree/branch-1.5
>
>A thread on infrastructure-dev [1] suggests that you use
>"-DlocalCheckout=false -DpushChanges=false" to prevent
>maven-release-plugin from pushing changes to apache git that cannot be
>overwritten. Seems like good advice to me.
>
>Julian
>
>[1] https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastructure-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAKa9qDmG8=dR2rVqTc+O9DGeetg098qFow4Efk4fcfLM8gmT3g@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> We are done with 949 (not an issue finally). I'll be waiting for Jinfeng patch, then start the vote.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/5/15, 6:28 AM, "Jinfeng Ni" <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks a lot for the review comments, Julian!
>>>
>>>I'll address the comments and get a revised patch tomorrow. Hopefully,
>>>we can get it merged to this release. :-)
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Jinfeng
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I just reviewed 911. The tests all pass, and I now think that the chances that it will destabilize anything are low. If Jinfeng can get the review actions done tomorrow I think it could go into the release.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone disagree?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>>>>>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>>>>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>>>>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>>>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>>>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>>>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I got the 911 PR from Jinfeng, reviewed and tested, and it's in.
Thanks, Jinfeng!
Jesus,
We're good to go for RC 1.
Draft release notes: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/tree/branch-1.5
A thread on infrastructure-dev [1] suggests that you use
"-DlocalCheckout=false -DpushChanges=false" to prevent
maven-release-plugin from pushing changes to apache git that cannot be
overwritten. Seems like good advice to me.
Julian
[1] https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastructure-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAKa9qDmG8=dR2rVqTc+O9DGeetg098qFow4Efk4fcfLM8gmT3g@mail.gmail.com%3E
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> We are done with 949 (not an issue finally). I'll be waiting for Jinfeng patch, then start the vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
>
> On 11/5/15, 6:28 AM, "Jinfeng Ni" <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Thanks a lot for the review comments, Julian!
>>
>>I'll address the comments and get a revised patch tomorrow. Hopefully,
>>we can get it merged to this release. :-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Jinfeng
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I just reviewed 911. The tests all pass, and I now think that the chances that it will destabilize anything are low. If Jinfeng can get the review actions done tomorrow I think it could go into the release.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
>>>>
>>>> Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone disagree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>>>>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>>>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>>>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
We are done with 949 (not an issue finally). I'll be waiting for Jinfeng patch, then start the vote.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 11/5/15, 6:28 AM, "Jinfeng Ni" <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks a lot for the review comments, Julian!
>
>I'll address the comments and get a revised patch tomorrow. Hopefully,
>we can get it merged to this release. :-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Jinfeng
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I just reviewed 911. The tests all pass, and I now think that the chances that it will destabilize anything are low. If Jinfeng can get the review actions done tomorrow I think it could go into the release.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
>>>
>>> Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>>>>
>>>> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone disagree?
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>>>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jinfeng Ni <ji...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot for the review comments, Julian!
I'll address the comments and get a revised patch tomorrow. Hopefully,
we can get it merged to this release. :-)
Regards,
Jinfeng
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I just reviewed 911. The tests all pass, and I now think that the chances that it will destabilize anything are low. If Jinfeng can get the review actions done tomorrow I think it could go into the release.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
>>
>> Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>>>
>>> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>>>
>>>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone disagree?
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I just reviewed 911. The tests all pass, and I now think that the chances that it will destabilize anything are low. If Jinfeng can get the review actions done tomorrow I think it could go into the release.
Julian
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
>
> Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>>
>> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>>
>>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>>
>>> Anyone disagree?
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <maryann.xue@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release.
Julian
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
>
> I’ll also write some draft release notes.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>>
>> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>>
>> Anyone disagree?
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951
>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left.
I’ll also write some draft release notes.
Julian
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
>
> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
>
> Anyone disagree?
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
>> Hope it can go into the release.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>>
>>>
>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>>
>>>> I think we can probably check in
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>>> vote for the release.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.)
Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911.
Anyone disagree?
Julian
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
> Hope it can go into the release.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>>
>>
>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>>
>>> I think we can probably check in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>>> vote for the release.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Julian.
>>>>
>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>>> check in the branch for
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>>> good shape.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>>> and stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com>.
Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890.
Hope it can go into the release.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted
> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the
> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
>
>
> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem
>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>>
>> I think we can probably check in
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the
>> vote for the release.
>>
>> --
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<
>> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Julian.
>>>
>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if
>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because
>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>>
>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>>> check in the branch for
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>>> good shape.
>>>>
>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>>> and stable.
>>>>
>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive
>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment).
>>>>> I will post another update asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great
>>>>>>>>> if that
>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I
>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of
>>>>>>>>>>> date
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently
goofed/omitted the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can
understand the need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165
Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
>
> I think we can probably check in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the vote for the release.
>
> --
> Jesús
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Julian.
>>
>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>>
>> --
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Welcome back, Jesus.
>>>
>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>> check in the branch for
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>> good shape.
>>>
>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>> and stable.
>>>
>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>> and could go in before a vote.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>>
>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I will post another update asap.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>> CALCITE-903
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
>>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>>>>>>> now.
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
I think we can probably check in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the vote for the release.
--
Jesús
On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>Thanks Julian.
>
>I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
>
>--
>Jesús
>
>
>
>On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Welcome back, Jesus.
>>
>>Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>>check in the branch for
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>>cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>>patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>>good shape.
>>
>>I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>>with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>>and stable.
>>
>>There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>>and could go in before a vote.
>>
>>Julian
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>>
>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I will post another update asap.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>>CALCITE-903
>>>>
>>>>Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
>>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Julian.
I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID).
--
Jesús
On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>Welcome back, Jesus.
>
>Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
>check in the branch for
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
>cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
>patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
>good shape.
>
>I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
>with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
>and stable.
>
>There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
>and could go in before a vote.
>
>Julian
>
>
>On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>>
>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I will post another update asap.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>>CALCITE-903
>>>
>>>Josh Elser wrote:
>>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
>>>> patch being out of date.
>>>>
>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Welcome back, Jesus.
Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to
check in the branch for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will
cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of
patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in
good shape.
I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release
with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready
and stable.
There are outstanding patches from Maryann (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk
and could go in before a vote.
Julian
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
>
> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I will post another update asap.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
>
>
> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>>CALCITE-903
>>
>>Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Thanks, Julian.
>>>
>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
>>> patch being out of date.
>>>
>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>>
>>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>>
>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Maryann
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week.
I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I will post another update asap.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
>CALCITE-903
>
>Josh Elser wrote:
>> Thanks, Julian.
>>
>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
>> patch being out of date.
>>
>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>>
>>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>>
>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Maryann
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>>> now.
>>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for
CALCITE-903
Josh Elser wrote:
> Thanks, Julian.
>
> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
> patch being out of date.
>
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>>
>> Next up… 903, Josh?
>>
>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Maryann
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>>
>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date
>>>>> now.
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Julian.
I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the
patch being out of date.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> 938 and PR 160 are now both in.
>
> Next up… 903, Josh?
>
> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
>> one could be included in 1.5.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maryann
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>>
>>>>> Assignments:
>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>>
>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>>
>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date now.
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
938 and PR 160 are now both in.
Next up… 903, Josh?
Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis.
Julian
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
> one could be included in 1.5.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Maryann
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>>>
>>>> Assignments:
>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>>>
>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date now.
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Maryann Xue <ma...@gmail.com>.
Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that
one could be included in 1.5.
Thanks,
Maryann
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>
> >> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
> >>
> >> Assignments:
> >> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
> >
> >
> > FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
> >
> > CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
> > watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date now.
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>
>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>>
>> Assignments:
>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
>
>
> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
>
> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date now.
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
>
> Assignments:
> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160
CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't
watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date now.
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below.
Assignments:
* Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903
* Sean: 922
* Jinfeng: 911
* Me: 816, 890 (review), 926 (review), 849 (review)
* Jesus: 931 (review)
I think I've assigned fixVersion = 1.5.0 for all important issues.
If there are any other bugs with patches available please let me know
and I'll make sure we at least review before 1.5.
Julian
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gotta run to the doctor, but, when I get back, I'll make a pass over the
> open PRs and see if I can consolidate/order.
>
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>
>> I’ve just checked in PR 144.
>>
>> What’s next? Bruno’s CALCITE-871? Or suggest something, Josh.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing& testing now. I'll let you know when it's in,
>>>
>>> then we can move onto the next set of patches.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good
>>>> to
>>>> go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found, Julian,
>>>> fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over my
>>>> original
>>>> changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I think it's a
>>>> nice
>>>> improvement over what I had initially.
>>>>
>>>> After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that
>>>> require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your legwork.
>>>>
>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
>>>>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that
>>>>>> affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> check in generated code.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871
>>>>>> (which
>>>>>> relies on 912). Any more?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be
>>>>>> responsive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your
>>>>>> patches
>>>>>> should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull
>>>>>> request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain
>>>>>> CALCITE-927.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for
>>>>>>> Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some
>>>>>>> more polishing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> to complete?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Gotta run to the doctor, but, when I get back, I'll make a pass over the
open PRs and see if I can consolidate/order.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> I’ve just checked in PR 144.
>
> What’s next? Bruno’s CALCITE-871? Or suggest something, Josh.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing& testing now. I'll let you know when it's in,
>> then we can move onto the next set of patches.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good to
>>> go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found, Julian,
>>> fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over my original
>>> changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I think it's a nice
>>> improvement over what I had initially.
>>>
>>> After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that
>>> require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian.
>>>
>>> I appreciate your legwork.
>>>
>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
>>>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that
>>>>> affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to
>>>>> check in generated code.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which
>>>>> relies on 912). Any more?
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be
>>>>> responsive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches
>>>>> should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull
>>>>> request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain
>>>>> CALCITE-927.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for
>>>>>> Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some
>>>>>> more polishing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>>> to complete?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I’ve just checked in PR 144.
What’s next? Bruno’s CALCITE-871? Or suggest something, Josh.
Julian
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Josh. Reviewing & testing now. I'll let you know when it's in,
> then we can move onto the next set of patches.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good to
>> go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found, Julian,
>> fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over my original
>> changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I think it's a nice
>> improvement over what I had initially.
>>
>> After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that
>> require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian.
>>
>> I appreciate your legwork.
>>
>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
>>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that
>>>> affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to
>>>> check in generated code.)
>>>>
>>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which
>>>> relies on 912). Any more?
>>>>
>>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be
>>>> responsive.
>>>>
>>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches
>>>> should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull
>>>> request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain
>>>> CALCITE-927.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for
>>>>> Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>>>
>>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some
>>>>> more polishing.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>> to complete?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Thanks Josh. Reviewing & testing now. I'll let you know when it's in,
then we can move onto the next set of patches.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good to
> go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found, Julian,
> fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over my original
> changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I think it's a nice
> improvement over what I had initially.
>
> After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that
> require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian.
>
> I appreciate your legwork.
>
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>
>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that
>>> affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to
>>> check in generated code.)
>>>
>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which
>>> relies on 912). Any more?
>>>
>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be
>>> responsive.
>>>
>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches
>>> should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull
>>> request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain
>>> CALCITE-927.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for
>>>> Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>>
>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some
>>>> more polishing.
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>> to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good
to go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found,
Julian, fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over
my original changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I
think it's a nice improvement over what I had initially.
After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that
require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian.
I appreciate your legwork.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to check in generated code.)
>>
>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which relies on 912). Any more?
>>
>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be responsive.
>>
>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain CALCITE-927.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>
>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>
>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>> to complete?
>>>>
>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hrmm, before I forget, let's give some more thought to the generated
code. I'll think about this (search around for some tools) and spin off
a different thread to figure out how to ease that.
I don't think any of my open PRs are inherently dependent on each other
(I always re-branched from master when starting a new issue). I would
hope that the .proto files merge cleanly and the Java just needs to be
regenerated.
If you want to treat GH as the review tool, I can just make a big PR
with multiple properly-named commits and relieve the merge-pain (like
you suggested on CALCITE-645).
Julian Hyde wrote:
> And 913 too.
>
> This is depressing.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to check in generated code.)
>>>
>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which relies on 912). Any more?
>>>
>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be responsive.
>>>
>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain CALCITE-927.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>>
>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>> to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
And 913 too.
This is depressing.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to check in generated code.)
>>
>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which relies on 912). Any more?
>>
>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be responsive.
>>
>> Josh & Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain CALCITE-927.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>>
>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>
>>>> Here are some dates:
>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>> release on about 10/13.
>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>> to complete?
>>>>
>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh.
Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to check in generated code.)
>
> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which relies on 912). Any more?
>
> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be responsive.
>
> Josh & Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain CALCITE-927.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>>
>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>
>>> Here are some dates:
>>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>> release on about 10/13.
>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>> to complete?
>>>
>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to check in generated code.)
Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which relies on 912). Any more?
If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be responsive.
Josh & Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain CALCITE-927.
Julian
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
>
> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some more polishing.
>
> - Josh
>
> Julian Hyde wrote:
>> When would be a good time for our next release?
>>
>> Here are some dates:
>> * We aim to release "every month or so".
>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>> release on about 10/13.
>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>
>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>> to complete?
>>
>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for
Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645
I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some
more polishing.
- Josh
Julian Hyde wrote:
> When would be a good time for our next release?
>
> Here are some dates:
> * We aim to release "every month or so".
> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
> release on about 10/13.
> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
> top-level project as early as 10/21.
>
> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
> to complete?
>
> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>
> Julian
>
> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.
Unless we really need a release before graduation, I would suggest just
waiting until after. Afterwards, it takes four days: 3 for the vote, one to
propagate to mirrors. Historically, my experience has been that the
incubator general vote is painful.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after
> graduating?
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
> >
> > If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
> > project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
> > team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
> > Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
> > feel about all this?
> >
> > We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
> > * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
> > * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
> > * October 16th (Friday) - release
> >
> >
> > About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
> > it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jesús
> >
> >
> > On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>When would be a good time for our next release?
> >>
> >>Here are some dates:
> >>* We aim to release "every month or so".
> >>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
> >>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
> >>release on about 10/13.
> >>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
> >>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
> >>top-level project as early as 10/21.
> >>
> >>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
> >>to complete?
> >>
> >>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
> >>
> >>Julian
> >>
> >>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
> >>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
> >>
> >
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
I have just pushed a new SNAPSHOT based on git commit f5f83e5df2ada64bfc211952f2f273619d94d3ae.
I created HIVE-12186 to track the upgrade to 1.5 in Hive. Waiting for QA results; I will update the thread shortly.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 10/14/15, 11:28 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as someone who knows how Maven works.
>
>Thanks!
>
>I always thought it ironic that they called it “maven”, considering you need to be an expert to use it.
>
>Julian
>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as someone who knows how Maven works.
Thanks!
I always thought it ironic that they called it “maven”, considering you need to be an expert to use it.
Julian
Re: Next release?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Julian Hyde wrote:
> We're getting close to our first RC. Time for a status update.
>
> I have checked in 785 and 910; 816 is the remaining big issue on my plate.
>
> Has anyone tested against the snapshot? What did you find?
>
> Jacques raised an issue last release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-861 "Fix or document
> issue where first time user cannot use mvn compile". I think we need
> to fix it before the release. Can someone investigate?
I'll try to take a look at this tonight. I sometimes masquerade as
someone who knows how Maven works.
> Jesus, What's your perspective on the state of the release?
>
> Julian
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
We're getting close to our first RC. Time for a status update.
I have checked in 785 and 910; 816 is the remaining big issue on my plate.
Has anyone tested against the snapshot? What did you find?
Jacques raised an issue last release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-861 "Fix or document
issue where first time user cannot use mvn compile". I think we need
to fix it before the release. Can someone investigate?
Jesus, What's your perspective on the state of the release?
Julian
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
> then 816 in a few days.
>
> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>
> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
> snapshot anytime you like.
>
> Julian
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
> MULTISET support
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>
>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>
>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>
>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>>Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
Sure, let's proceed that way then, and release after graduation.
As Julian suggested, I've pushed a 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT to the Apache Snapshot Repo. Please try out this branch and report back whether you see any showstopping regressions.
You can test it by adding the following maven snapshot repository to your pom.xml:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/
The version of the artifacts to reference is 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT. The artifacts are currently based on git commit 126a5e3c7317be0b0fb94568c6b6c5434fbf9e2c.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 10/5/15, 8:29 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>I agree with Jacques: we should release after graduation.
>
>But I think we should get a release ready before graduation, including
>snapshots, stabilization, release candidates and an informal vote for
>a release candidate. All being well, we can start a formal vote as a
>top-level PMC on Oct 22nd, the day after the Board meeting.
>
>Jesus goes on vacation soon after that, so but we basically will have
>the release in the bag by then.
>
>Julian
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
>> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
>> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
>> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
>> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
>> then 816 in a few days.
>>
>> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
>> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
>> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>>
>> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
>> snapshot anytime you like.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
>> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
>> MULTISET support
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>>
>>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>>
>>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Julian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I agree with Jacques: we should release after graduation.
But I think we should get a release ready before graduation, including
snapshots, stabilization, release candidates and an informal vote for
a release candidate. All being well, we can start a formal vote as a
top-level PMC on Oct 22nd, the day after the Board meeting.
Jesus goes on vacation soon after that, so but we basically will have
the release in the bag by then.
Julian
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
> release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
> ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
> issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
> check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
> then 816 in a few days.
>
> That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
> change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
> worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
>
> I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
> snapshot anytime you like.
>
> Julian
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
> ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
> MULTISET support
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> <jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>>
>> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>>
>>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>>> feel about all this?
>>>>
>>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jesús
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>>
>>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>>to complete?
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>>
>>>>>Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
I still have some big pieces of work I'd like to get in before the
release: 816 (sub-query), 785 (piglet), 910 (improved handling of
ARRAY, MULTISET, STRUCT, MAP). I am developing 910 (along with other
issues related to multisets: 854, 879, 877) on the 785 branch. I will
check it in first, hopefully tomorrow. 785 will come soon after, and
then 816 in a few days.
That said, it is worth making a snapshot tonight. The biggest API
change in the release, 828 (RelBuilder) is already in, and it would be
worth seeing whether Hive, Drill etc. can run against it.
I have checked 909 and 906 into Apache master so you can make the
snapshot anytime you like.
Julian
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-785 piglet
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 sub-query
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-828 RelBuilder
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-854 UNNEST with ORDINALITY
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-877 ROW as argument to UNCOLLECT
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-879 COLLECT
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-909 Make
ReduceExpressionsRule extensible
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-910 improve ARRAY,
MULTISET support
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
>
> We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
>
> On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>>
>>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>>
>>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>>> feel about all this?
>>>
>>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>>
>>>
>>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesús
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>>
>>>>Here are some dates:
>>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>>to complete?
>>>>
>>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>>
>>>>Julian
>>>>
>>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
I still want to add CALCITE-909 to the release, it is just pending review.
We didn't hear about any other pending issues, I guess we can move forward with the 1.5 release? Should we enter the stabilization period today i.e. freeze by the end of the day and create the first SNAPSHOT?
Thanks,
Jesús
On 9/30/15, 8:24 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
>
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
><jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>>
>> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
>> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
>> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
>> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
>> feel about all this?
>>
>> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
>> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
>> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
>> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>>
>>
>> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
>> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>>
>>>Here are some dates:
>>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>>release on about 10/13.
>>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>>to complete?
>>>
>>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>>
>>>Julian
>>>
>>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>>
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Can someone comment on how long it will take to make a release after graduating?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
<jc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> @Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
>
> If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
> project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
> team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
> Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
> feel about all this?
>
> We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
> * October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
> * October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
> * October 16th (Friday) - release
>
>
> About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
> it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
>
> On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>When would be a good time for our next release?
>>
>>Here are some dates:
>>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>>release on about 10/13.
>>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>>
>>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>>to complete?
>>
>>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>>
>>Julian
>>
>>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>>
>
Re: Next release?
Posted by Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jc...@hortonworks.com>.
@Julian, sure, it will be nice to be the release manager for 1.5.
If I understand well, once the vote to establish Calcite as a top-level
project passes, there should be some work together with the Apache infra
team to do the migration to top-level project, right?
Thus, I think it makes sense to release 1.5 before that. How do others
feel about all this?
We could try to follow this tentative schedule:
* October 2nd (Friday) - close MASTER, enter stabilization period
* October 9th (Friday) - first release candidate
* October 16th (Friday) - release
About pending patches: on my side, I plan to review CALCITE-900 today so
it can go in. I will try to include CALCITE-856 too.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 9/29/15, 7:16 PM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>When would be a good time for our next release?
>
>Here are some dates:
>* We aim to release "every month or so".
>* 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1].
>* It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could
>release on about 10/13.
>* The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to
>establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a
>top-level project as early as 10/21.
>
>Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like
>to complete?
>
>Jesus, could you take on the release manager role?
>
>Julian
>
>[1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0
>[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
>