RE: [RT] ComponentizedProcessor (was RE: Migrating TreeProcessor to Fortress)

[Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>]

Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>> Conclusion
>> ----------
>>
>> I'm wondering if we should write this new sitemap engine in the 2.2
>> branch or if it should go in the 2.1. Fortress isn't a requirement to
>> implement this, and it will allow us to provide views and resource
>> inheritance before the 2.2 is out.
>>
> I think we shouldn't change the running implementation for 2.1, let's
> do it for 2.2 and if it is the "killer implementation", we can move
> it to 2.1 later on anyway.
> But for now, we should focus on 2.2 and see that we get a startable
> cocoon version again :)

+1 We need to "save" some tricks for the new 2.2 version :-D

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo