CVS infrastructure (was: Re: Graph data)

[David Crossley <cr...@indexgeo.com.au>]

Steven Noels wrote:
> John Morrison wrote:
> >
> > I'd *like* to setup a proper file system structure in cvs for
> > the webapp - unfortunately I have no idea as to what is
> > required...
> 
> Well, we could at least start to set up an infrastructure for our own project
> pages, built using a CLI-Cocoon:
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/krysalis/krysalis-centipede/ ?
> 
> I'd say we start off with the static stuff described in Stefano's [RT]: primarly
> project pages, stylesheets, and the graph logs...
> 
> Can we start with the assumption there will be one instance of a forrest/cocoon
> webapp, presumably triggered through the CLI, that collects a number of
> documents from the different project dirs (forrest included), and pipes these
> through some stylesheets generating the static site Stefano sketched in
> xml-forrest\layout\xml.apache.org\ ?
> 
> Ah, I just see David addressing our shared concern. Who will take the lead in
> this?
> 
> Fingers itching to get started :-)
> 
> </Steven>

I can help out a little tonight. However, i am away for a week
holiday starting tomorrow, so i cannot continue with it.

Do you people think that we need to vote on putting
Centipede in as a kickstart? We have been trying to
discuss it for about two weeks now.

--David

David Crossley wrote:
> Morrison, John wrote:
> > Steven Noels wrote:
> > 
> > > Would you folks (John?) like me to patch my submission of 
> > > yesterday after it
> > > gets checked in somehow, or just send in another zip with 
> > > different filenames
> > > etc...?
> > 
> > I'd *like* to setup a proper file system structure in cvs for
> > the webapp - unfortunately I have no idea as to what is
> > required...
> 
> This is where i see that the Forrest project has stuck in its
> incubation. We need some initial structure to CVS before
> we can go much further. I would like to get going with some
> general project doco and its infrastructure.
> 
> So what do others think about the kick-start project structure
> offered by Krysalis Centipede and discussed in the other
> Forrest thread ... "Re: [Proposal] initial build system for Forrest"
> Anyway, we can always change a CVS structure once it is started
>
> --David

RE: CVS infrastructure (was: Re: Graph data)

[Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>]

David Crossley wrote:

> I wrote myself:
>
> > Ah, I just see David addressing our shared concern. Who will take
> the lead in
> > this?
> >
> > Fingers itching to get started :-)
> >
> > </Steven>
>
> I can help out a little tonight. However, i am away for a week
> holiday starting tomorrow, so i cannot continue with it.
>
> Do you people think that we need to vote on putting
> Centipede in as a kickstart? We have been trying to
> discuss it for about two weeks now.
>

I can help out tomorrow, which means we have a full-time around-the-clock team
working from Europe and Australia for the next 24 hours or so :-)

Next week, there will be evening-time too - so I'd be happy to continue.

Centipede seems like a wise thing to do: my 'vanity vote' is +1.

</Steven>

ps: happy holidays!