You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/01/13 22:17:00 UTC
[I] Performance Regression or Improvement: cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_2MB_values:runtime [beam]
github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #33576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33576
Performance change found in the
test: `cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_2MB_values` for the metric: `runtime`.
For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
`Triage performance alert issues` section of the [README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
`Test description:` CoGroupByKey Python Load test - reiterate 4 times 2 MB values
python | coGBK | reiteration 2MB value
Test Link - https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e38decf9e723a385057131b01bbd33d8c60bda3/.test-infra/jenkins/job_LoadTests_coGBK_Python.groovy#L128
Test Dashboard - http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/fK0U4JqWz/cogbk-load-tests?orgId=1&var-processingType=batch&var-sdk=python&viewPanel=5
```
timestamp: Mon Jan 6 16:31:22 2025, metric_value: 105.00
timestamp: Sun Jan 5 16:23:56 2025, metric_value: 114.00
timestamp: Sat Jan 4 16:15:14 2025, metric_value: 97.00
timestamp: Fri Jan 3 16:17:02 2025, metric_value: 110.00
timestamp: Thu Jan 2 16:27:10 2025, metric_value: 116.00
timestamp: Wed Jan 1 16:24:08 2025, metric_value: 148.00
timestamp: Tue Dec 31 16:36:25 2024, metric_value: 130.00
timestamp: Mon Dec 30 16:26:50 2024, metric_value: 98.00
timestamp: Sun Dec 29 16:23:17 2024, metric_value: 110.00
timestamp: Sat Dec 28 16:25:41 2024, metric_value: 115.00
timestamp: Fri Dec 27 16:22:50 2024, metric_value: 110.00 <---- Anomaly
timestamp: Thu Dec 26 16:33:48 2024, metric_value: 123.00
timestamp: Wed Dec 25 16:31:27 2024, metric_value: 131.00
timestamp: Tue Dec 24 16:23:28 2024, metric_value: 121.00
timestamp: Mon Dec 23 16:25:10 2024, metric_value: 156.00
timestamp: Sun Dec 22 16:24:53 2024, metric_value: 122.00
timestamp: Sat Dec 21 16:24:29 2024, metric_value: 126.00
timestamp: Fri Dec 20 16:29:06 2024, metric_value: 107.00
timestamp: Thu Dec 19 16:30:57 2024, metric_value: 143.00
timestamp: Wed Dec 18 16:26:37 2024, metric_value: 106.00
timestamp: Tue Dec 17 16:31:27 2024, metric_value: 147.00
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Performance Regression or Improvement: cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_2MB_values:runtime [beam]
Posted by "liferoad (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
liferoad closed issue #33576:
Performance Regression or Improvement: cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_2MB_values:runtime
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org