You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Varga Balázs <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/15 13:23:54 UTC
OM and HTML5
Hello Developments!
I don't know, what the different a OM 2.1.1 and 3.0.0 (3.0.1) in
conference core side.
The 2.1.x is HTML4 , good backward compatibility, a 3.0.0 is HTML5, this
features request only the portal functions and core is none.
I am a OM service provider and use only room functions on REST calls,
portal never use.
My participants very incompatibile browsers (many user from world)
probally conferencing hier.
The OM core is many bugfix and features presents the prev 1 year, and
this bugfixs is more in OM 3.0.
The 2.1.1 version is better browser compatibility, the conference core 2
or 3 better stabile working?
The 2.1.1 is many broken connection in room session, whenn connection
lost, the user is drop out login page or portal inside room management.
Problem: My system full REST app, the user never see portal... all
functions, calls work in backend and silent, the user parse all from my
portal.
The om 3.0 stabiliti better than 2.1 in my test sessions.
Or the 2vs3 core equivalent?
Howto mix OM 3.0.0 conference room core (db, swf-s...etc) the oldest HTML?
Balazs Varga
http://server6.magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/openmeetings
Re: OM and HTML5
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
The only option to preserve ids while installing is to use command line
admin
-i -file backup.zip --skip-default-rooms
(or similar, please check command line admin options)
never tried downgrade
I believe you can use 3.0.0 for SOAP/REST integration as well as 2.x
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Varga Balázs <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Maxim !
>
> More question:
>
> A can downgrade OM3 (currently om3.to OM2 a simple, or require
> reinstalling (db structure and REST link)?
> A find many db structure changes in oldest time an upgrades (i testing
> many-many version from jenkins, follow dayli upgrades).
>
> I try one oldest time upgrading 2.1.x to 2.1.x minor upgrade and the
> backup/restore call is unsuccesfull, the restored records id-s not equ in
> oldest struct. The backup is dump each datas from db and restore fills from
> this, the process is none SQLDUMP, this a native StepByStep data loading
> and the original record id-s is lost (this id-s is hardlinked from my
> portal app). The table connections is cascaded, my problem, the user and
> room is-s is changed after restoring.
> I refresh the code library only since then, the database not (whenn db
> field error have in log, manualy update and working all good).
>
>
> Wher can I downloading latest OM2 ?
>
> Balazs
>
> 2.x is NOT HTML4 it is swf (Adobe flash)
> both 2.2 and 3.0 have the same code for the room
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Varga Balázs <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Developments!
>>
>> I don't know, what the different a OM 2.1.1 and 3.0.0 (3.0.1) in
>> conference core side.
>>
>> The 2.1.x is HTML4 , good backward compatibility, a 3.0.0 is HTML5, this
>> features request only the portal functions and core is none.
>>
>> I am a OM service provider and use only room functions on REST calls,
>> portal never use.
>> My participants very incompatibile browsers (many user from world)
>> probally conferencing hier.
>>
>> The OM core is many bugfix and features presents the prev 1 year, and
>> this bugfixs is more in OM 3.0.
>>
>> The 2.1.1 version is better browser compatibility, the conference core 2
>> or 3 better stabile working?
>>
>> The 2.1.1 is many broken connection in room session, whenn connection
>> lost, the user is drop out login page or portal inside room management.
>> Problem: My system full REST app, the user never see portal... all
>> functions, calls work in backend and silent, the user parse all from my
>> portal.
>> The om 3.0 stabiliti better than 2.1 in my test sessions.
>>
>>
>> Or the 2vs3 core equivalent?
>> Howto mix OM 3.0.0 conference room core (db, swf-s...etc) the oldest HTML?
>>
>> Balazs Varga
>> http://server6.magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/openmeetings
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: OM and HTML5
Posted by Varga Balázs <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Maxim !
More question:
A can downgrade OM3 (currently om3.to OM2 a simple, or require
reinstalling (db structure and REST link)?
A find many db structure changes in oldest time an upgrades (i testing
many-many version from jenkins, follow dayli upgrades).
I try one oldest time upgrading 2.1.x to 2.1.x minor upgrade and the
backup/restore call is unsuccesfull, the restored records id-s not equ
in oldest struct. The backup is dump each datas from db and restore
fills from this, the process is none SQLDUMP, this a native StepByStep
data loading and the original record id-s is lost (this id-s is
hardlinked from my portal app). The table connections is cascaded, my
problem, the user and room is-s is changed after restoring.
I refresh the code library only since then, the database not (whenn db
field error have in log, manualy update and working all good).
Wher can I downloading latest OM2 ?
Balazs
2.x is NOT HTML4 it is swf (Adobe flash)
both 2.2 and 3.0 have the same code for the room
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Varga Balázs <joinfok@gmail.com
<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Developments!
I don't know, what the different a OM 2.1.1 and 3.0.0 (3.0.1) in
conference core side.
The 2.1.x is HTML4 , good backward compatibility, a 3.0.0 is HTML5,
this features request only the portal functions and core is none.
I am a OM service provider and use only room functions on REST
calls, portal never use.
My participants very incompatibile browsers (many user from world)
probally conferencing hier.
The OM core is many bugfix and features presents the prev 1 year,
and this bugfixs is more in OM 3.0.
The 2.1.1 version is better browser compatibility, the conference
core 2 or 3 better stabile working?
The 2.1.1 is many broken connection in room session, whenn
connection lost, the user is drop out login page or portal inside
room management.
Problem: My system full REST app, the user never see portal... all
functions, calls work in backend and silent, the user parse all from
my portal.
The om 3.0 stabiliti better than 2.1 in my test sessions.
Or the 2vs3 core equivalent?
Howto mix OM 3.0.0 conference room core (db, swf-s...etc) the oldest
HTML?
Balazs Varga
http://server6.magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/openmeetings
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: OM and HTML5
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
2.x is NOT HTML4 it is swf (Adobe flash)
both 2.2 and 3.0 have the same code for the room
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Varga Balázs <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Developments!
>
> I don't know, what the different a OM 2.1.1 and 3.0.0 (3.0.1) in
> conference core side.
>
> The 2.1.x is HTML4 , good backward compatibility, a 3.0.0 is HTML5, this
> features request only the portal functions and core is none.
>
> I am a OM service provider and use only room functions on REST calls,
> portal never use.
> My participants very incompatibile browsers (many user from world)
> probally conferencing hier.
>
> The OM core is many bugfix and features presents the prev 1 year, and this
> bugfixs is more in OM 3.0.
>
> The 2.1.1 version is better browser compatibility, the conference core 2
> or 3 better stabile working?
>
> The 2.1.1 is many broken connection in room session, whenn connection
> lost, the user is drop out login page or portal inside room management.
> Problem: My system full REST app, the user never see portal... all
> functions, calls work in backend and silent, the user parse all from my
> portal.
> The om 3.0 stabiliti better than 2.1 in my test sessions.
>
>
> Or the 2vs3 core equivalent?
> Howto mix OM 3.0.0 conference room core (db, swf-s...etc) the oldest HTML?
>
> Balazs Varga
> http://server6.**magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/**openmeetings<http://server6.magyarwebkonferencia.hu:5080/openmeetings>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax