You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/02 21:46:56 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 26 Feb 2010, at 19:01, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
>>> Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm open to suggestions.... BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
>>>
>>> Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the
>>> same problem. BeanValidation might be ideal, and scans better than,
>>> say JSR303-Validation :)
>>
>> Most likely outcome -- this ends up becoming Commons Validator version 2. If project decides to go TLP, the BeanValidation would be good with me. I would certainly expect this to be resolved by the community for graduation.
>
> Sounds OK to me.
>
> Since it looks as if my previous reply got lost in the ether, let me confirm,
> I'm happy to withdraw my -1 on the basis that the issue has been raised
> and will be resolved before or during incubation.
Thanks Nick. Donald -- you called the vote. Can you close it, also?
--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Already done, unless there is something I missed...
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE---PROPOSAL--Validation-incubator-for-JSR-303-Bean-Validation-to27705544.html#a27751839
-Donald
On 3/2/10 3:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>>
>> On 26 Feb 2010, at 19:01, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
>>>> Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm open to suggestions.... BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
>>>>
>>>> Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the
>>>> same problem. BeanValidation might be ideal, and scans better than,
>>>> say JSR303-Validation :)
>>>
>>> Most likely outcome -- this ends up becoming Commons Validator version 2. If project decides to go TLP, the BeanValidation would be good with me. I would certainly expect this to be resolved by the community for graduation.
>>
>> Sounds OK to me.
>>
>> Since it looks as if my previous reply got lost in the ether, let me confirm,
>> I'm happy to withdraw my -1 on the basis that the issue has been raised
>> and will be resolved before or during incubation.
>
> Thanks Nick. Donald -- you called the vote. Can you close it, also?
>
> --kevan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org