You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net> on 2002/11/20 23:11:42 UTC
dsp files
Hey,
Before I post a fs patch.
Is that dsp generator done yet? :-)
I'm still spinning up on windows development. ... OK so all I've done is
install visual c++ and SQLServer:-)
My question is this; should I:
1. Attempt to update the dsp files and risk breaking them?
2. Hold off my patch until I have actually compiled under windows?
3. Punt to the windows wizards to make the dsp changes?
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: dsp files
Posted by br...@xbc.nu.
Quoting "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net>:
> Hey,
> Before I post a fs patch.
>
> Is that dsp generator done yet? :-)
Don't I just wish it were... Actually, I have to take a good look at the
refactoring Gstein has done in the makefile generator. Generating the dsp's
shouldn't be such a horror now.
> I'm still spinning up on windows development. ... OK so all I've done is
>
> install visual c++ and SQLServer:-)
>
> My question is this; should I:
> 1. Attempt to update the dsp files and risk breaking them?
If you haven't actually hacked dsp files before, then I strongly suggest against
that.
> 2. Hold off my patch until I have actually compiled under windows?
No way! Please send your patch, the sooner the better. I'll either have the
generator up and running, or will bang on the dsp's myself.
> 3. Punt to the windows wizards to make the dsp changes?
Please; they're warlocks, not wizards, and we don't have any of them on the
team. We only have a few pixies doing their mischief, and gnome or two digging
at the foundations. And I'm the troll, of course. :-)
Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: dsp files
Posted by Brandon Ehle <az...@yahoo.com>.
>
>
>3. Punt, thus encouraging the windows wizards to get rolling on that
> DSP generator. :-)
>
>
After having used Visual Studio .NET for the last couple days, I am all
in favor of dropping project files and just building from makefiles on
windows too. Any objections to generating windows makefiles instead of
project files?
After a half decent Visual Studio 6, I thought Visual Studio .NET might
be better. I couldn't have been more wrong...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: dsp files
Posted by cm...@collab.net.
"Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net> writes:
> My question is this; should I:
> 1. Attempt to update the dsp files and risk breaking them?
> 2. Hold off my patch until I have actually compiled under windows?
> 3. Punt to the windows wizards to make the dsp changes?
3. Punt, thus encouraging the windows wizards to get rolling on that
DSP generator. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org