You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Tim Sell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/11/27 21:10:20 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HBASE-1744) Thrift server to match the new java
api.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783159#action_12783159 ]
Tim Sell commented on HBASE-1744:
---------------------------------
Got an email from Lars Francke, who's doing some work on this.
Feel free to take it over :)
> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1744
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: thrift
> Reporter: Tim Sell
> Assignee: Tim Sell
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
> Attachments: thriftexperiment.patch
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
> 1:Bytes family,
> 2:Bytes qualifier,
> 3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
> 1:Bytes row,
> 2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc than if the columns in TPut were just map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.