You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@mynewt.apache.org by ja...@apache.org on 2022/09/06 12:26:05 UTC

[mynewt-nimble] branch master updated: nimble/ll: Fix BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_SET_DATA_LEN OCF

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

janc pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/mynewt-nimble.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new f85bbda0 nimble/ll: Fix BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_SET_DATA_LEN OCF
f85bbda0 is described below

commit f85bbda005b7507111d728a33950bdc8e445ceb9
Author: Szymon Janc <sz...@codecoup.pl>
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 6 14:04:39 2022 +0200

    nimble/ll: Fix BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_SET_DATA_LEN OCF
    
    This was duplicating BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_CSS_ENABLE and caused assert
    on register.
---
 nimble/include/nimble/hci_common.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/nimble/include/nimble/hci_common.h b/nimble/include/nimble/hci_common.h
index cfcbd822..a3c3dc3f 100644
--- a/nimble/include/nimble/hci_common.h
+++ b/nimble/include/nimble/hci_common.h
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ struct ble_hci_vs_css_read_conn_slot_rp {
     uint16_t conn_handle;
     uint16_t slot_idx;
 } __attribute__((packed));
-#define BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_SET_DATA_LEN                     (MYNEWT_VAL(BLE_HCI_VS_OCF_OFFSET) + (0x0004))
+#define BLE_HCI_OCF_VS_SET_DATA_LEN                     (MYNEWT_VAL(BLE_HCI_VS_OCF_OFFSET) + (0x0008))
 struct ble_hci_vs_set_data_len_cp {
     uint16_t conn_handle;
     uint16_t tx_octets;