You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp> on 2008/06/23 14:11:33 UTC
bpc will be deprecated?
Hi.
We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS
that uses Shindig now.
However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed
in the trunk code set of Java
implementation.
Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
Best regards,
Yoichiro
---
Yoichiro Tanaka
mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
Re: bpc will be deprecated?
Posted by Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Arne Roomann-Kurrik <ku...@google.com>
wrote:
> Is it an error? Historically, this was the only way to disable caching on
> orkut.
Err -- yeah, you're right, I was thinking that this was referring to the
iframe url, not the application page. There was a bug on orkut where they
were passing bpc=1 instead of nocache=1 to the iframe, but that has been
resolved.
>
>
> ~Arne
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Brown <et...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name, too.
> :)
> > > I'll use nocache today.
> > >
> > > Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for
> > > developers.
> > > I think that it should change the content written in following url from
> > bpc
> > > to nocache.
> > >
> > > [Bypassing orkut's application XML cache]
> > > http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc
> >
> >
> > That's just an orkut documentation error.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Yoichiro
> > >
> > > On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
> > >> oddly-named parameter.
> > >> the
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi.
> > >>>
> > >>> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of
> SNS
> > >>> that
> > >>> uses Shindig now.
> > >>> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed
> in
> > >>> the
> > >>> trunk code set of Java
> > >>> implementation.
> > >>>
> > >>> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Yoichiro
> > >>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> Yoichiro Tanaka
> > >>> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> > >>> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > > ---
> > > Yoichiro Tanaka
> > > mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> > > blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> OpenSocial IRC - irc://irc.freenode.net/opensocial
>
Re: bpc will be deprecated?
Posted by Arne Roomann-Kurrik <ku...@google.com>.
Is it an error? Historically, this was the only way to disable caching on
orkut.
~Arne
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Brown <et...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name, too. :)
> > I'll use nocache today.
> >
> > Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for
> > developers.
> > I think that it should change the content written in following url from
> bpc
> > to nocache.
> >
> > [Bypassing orkut's application XML cache]
> > http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc
>
>
> That's just an orkut documentation error.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yoichiro
> >
> > On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
> >> oddly-named parameter.
> >> the
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS
> >>> that
> >>> uses Shindig now.
> >>> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed in
> >>> the
> >>> trunk code set of Java
> >>> implementation.
> >>>
> >>> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Yoichiro
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Yoichiro Tanaka
> >>> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> >>> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> > ---
> > Yoichiro Tanaka
> > mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> > blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
> >
> >
> >
>
--
OpenSocial IRC - irc://irc.freenode.net/opensocial
Re: bpc will be deprecated?
Posted by Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name, too. :)
> I'll use nocache today.
>
> Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for
> developers.
> I think that it should change the content written in following url from bpc
> to nocache.
>
> [Bypassing orkut's application XML cache]
> http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc
That's just an orkut documentation error.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yoichiro
>
> On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote:
>
> Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
>> oddly-named parameter.
>> the
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>>
>>> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS
>>> that
>>> uses Shindig now.
>>> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed in
>>> the
>>> trunk code set of Java
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Yoichiro
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Yoichiro Tanaka
>>> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
>>> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> ---
> Yoichiro Tanaka
> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
>
>
>
Re: bpc will be deprecated?
Posted by Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>.
Hi John,
Thank you for your answer. I think that bpc is pretty oddly-name,
too. :)
I'll use nocache today.
Well, I seem that bypassing XML cache with bpc is general way for
developers.
I think that it should change the content written in following url
from bpc to nocache.
[Bypassing orkut's application XML cache]
http://code.google.com/apis/orkut/docs/orkutdevguide.html#bpc
Best regards,
Yoichiro
On 2008/06/24, at 2:48, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
> oddly-named parameter.
> the
> John
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of
>> SNS that
>> uses Shindig now.
>> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is
>> processed in the
>> trunk code set of Java
>> implementation.
>>
>> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Yoichiro
>>
>> ---
>> Yoichiro Tanaka
>> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
>> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
>>
>>
>>
---
Yoichiro Tanaka
mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
Re: bpc will be deprecated?
Posted by John Hjelmstad <fa...@google.com>.
Yes, I'd recommend using nocache rather than bpc. bpc was always an
oddly-named parameter.
John
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Yoichiro Tanaka <yo...@eisbahn.jp>
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We can disable a caching mechanism by appending &bpc=1 in a lot of SNS that
> uses Shindig now.
> However, I can't find the place where the bpc parameter is processed in the
> trunk code set of Java
> implementation.
>
> Should not bpc be used, and should we use nocache in the future?
>
> Best regards,
> Yoichiro
>
> ---
> Yoichiro Tanaka
> mail-to: yoichiro@eisbahn.jp
> blog: http://www.eisbahn.jp/yoichiro/
>
>
>