You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Apache Royale CI Server <ap...@gmail.com> on 2019/09/06 11:08:53 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Piotr Zarzycki
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andrew,
I hope you are all safe! Take care!
Thanks,
Piotr
niedz., 8 wrz 2019 o 11:24 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> We have no power until maybe Tuesday due to hurricane Dorian passing by.
> Can review the files then.
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 4:47 AM Alex Harui, <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> > before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
> >
> > Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> > be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> > BasicJS/src/test
> > CoreJS/src/test
> > NetworkJS/src/test
> > ReflectionJS/src/test
> > RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> > XMLJS/src/test
> >
> > This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages
> or
> > our repo.
> > .factorypath
> >
> > I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> > playerglobal
> > The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to
> > confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
> >
> > I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
> >
> > The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> > package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> > folders.
> > royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
> >
> > And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the
> > top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
> >
> > There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> > I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> > Should
> > I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files
> in
> > folders?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynjala@bowlerhat.dev
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> > with the
> > > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning !
> I
> > was
> > > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and
> prepare
> > nice
> > > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> > assume.
> > > -
> > > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <cottage14@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> > what's in
> > > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > > >
> > > > > a
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for
> this
> > RC
> > > > couple
> > > > > of
> > > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> > related
> > > to
> > > > > MX.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was
> failing,
> > does
> > > it
> > > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> > reviewing
> > > stuff.
> > > > > > What
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > > > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > >*
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=HW2N%2FKqnt%2BRo%2FuR9SIpT%2BI5me%2Bayg%2FJzApfbI37UVCc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
We have no power until maybe Tuesday due to hurricane Dorian passing by.
Can review the files then.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 4:47 AM Alex Harui, <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to
> confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@bowlerhat.dev
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > > <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> >*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=HW2N%2FKqnt%2BRo%2FuR9SIpT%2BI5me%2Bayg%2FJzApfbI37UVCc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I pushed some changes that should prevent packaging the output in the src/test folders, and changes to the compiler repo to package royaleunit-ant-tasks.
I also fixed a bunch of issues running a build in js-only mode.
I also pushed Andrew's suggested release_notes changes.
HTH,
-Alex
On 9/8/19, 12:47 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
BasicJS/src/test
CoreJS/src/test
NetworkJS/src/test
ReflectionJS/src/test
RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
XMLJS/src/test
This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages or our repo.
.factorypath
I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for playerglobal
The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new folders.
royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
HTH,
-Alex
On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files. Should
I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
folders?
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes with the
> things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=KQIhHQDQSbHpQuqJkMg8CbzMUDflFoyL%2B%2BWFRtxGqZM%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
> > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
> > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume.
> -
> > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related
> to
> > > MX.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does
> it
> > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing
> stuff.
> > > > What
> > > > > if
> > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: *https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=EZTUdYBNGl8g7VbSry4IT90OSI3f1XNOjPoi6go2vM0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=EZTUdYBNGl8g7VbSry4IT90OSI3f1XNOjPoi6go2vM0%3D&reserved=0>*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=08Pk6Jl97sIW%2BQJfy4j2MOiQrOP8MxHuZh6B9MzGB8s%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=OVCy%2B9s3vwnFt5odxF8O6Zp%2Fy071DTTjs4%2BCzaov4z8%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C502e7e50d2994f454c4b08d73430cfdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035256568127536&sdata=OVCy%2B9s3vwnFt5odxF8O6Zp%2Fy071DTTjs4%2BCzaov4z8%3D&reserved=0
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Piotr,
Don't run the steps until the necessary changes have been made.
Also, don't delete the release branches as changes have been made in there that are not in develop.
-Alex
On 9/8/19, 2:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
I will make clean up on release branch for those folders and run stuff
again.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 9:47 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to
> confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@bowlerhat.dev
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=qsqMLtu%2FheSTsgTcjb%2FsTRApZL6V%2BLe%2FkxhWmdJoT7U%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=qd9bwZCGnulwStphvtmRnGOExUDT6D%2Bec5iUUSy5tW4%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > > <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=qd9bwZCGnulwStphvtmRnGOExUDT6D%2Bec5iUUSy5tW4%3D&reserved=0
> >*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=Z4uHaxCa1IZe%2BjrxLH7xJrlzJU%2BuneD33MNTrmWrk%2F0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=YEPtWtBCLOw2cI75zlCeOMkl41DNUy2gmvnFuUF9ZSs%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=YEPtWtBCLOw2cI75zlCeOMkl41DNUy2gmvnFuUF9ZSs%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
I will make clean up on release branch for those folders and run stuff
again.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 9:47 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to
> confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@bowlerhat.dev
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > > <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> >*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=HW2N%2FKqnt%2BRo%2FuR9SIpT%2BI5me%2Bayg%2FJzApfbI37UVCc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't be, IMO. Some clean step is missing somewhere.
BasicJS/src/test
CoreJS/src/test
NetworkJS/src/test
ReflectionJS/src/test
RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
XMLJS/src/test
This file was found by rat. I don't think it should be in the packages or our repo.
.factorypath
I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for playerglobal
The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM. I didn't have time to confirm. Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the package. The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new folders.
royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files. Andrew can you edit both the top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
HTH,
-Alex
On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files. Should
I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
folders?
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes with the
> things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
> > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
> > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume.
> -
> > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related
> to
> > > MX.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does
> it
> > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing
> stuff.
> > > > What
> > > > > if
> > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: *https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0>*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=HW2N%2FKqnt%2BRo%2FuR9SIpT%2BI5me%2Bayg%2FJzApfbI37UVCc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=KV4vXyCGGHAkJrKTLjDdS%2FI5V%2BgQ9KKl20NuYfqsu3M%3D&reserved=0
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files. Should
I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
folders?
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes with the
> things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
> > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
> > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume.
> -
> > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related
> to
> > > MX.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does
> it
> > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing
> stuff.
> > > > What
> > > > > if
> > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>.
I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes with the
things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
> going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
> list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume. -
> It's not going to happen from my sight.
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> > 0.9.6, the current release.
> >
> > a
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC
> couple
> > of
> > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related to
> > MX.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
> > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff.
> > > What
> > > > if
> > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume. -
It's not going to happen from my sight.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> 0.9.6, the current release.
>
> a
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC couple
> of
> > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related to
> MX.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
> > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff.
> > What
> > > if
> > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
0.9.6, the current release.
a
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC couple of
> days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related to MX.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
> > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff.
> What
> > if
> > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Piotr,
I think MX test are failing for some months now, so don't think that the
fail is related to your changes.
I can't say so much since I don't know so much about that concrete part.
thanks
El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 16:29, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC couple of
> days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related to MX.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
> > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff.
> What
> > if
> > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carlos,
IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC couple of
days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related to MX.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
> affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
>
> Thanks
>
> El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff. What
> if
> > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> apacheroyaleci@gmail.com>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Piotr,
thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does it
affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
Thanks
El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff. What if
> vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <ap...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr Zarzycki
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guys,
I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing stuff. What if
vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
Thanks,
Piotr
pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <ap...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr Zarzycki
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*