You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Andy Jefferson <an...@jpox.org> on 2005/11/22 13:25:59 UTC
TCK : ResultClassRequirements test - LongString class
The result class LongString has a field "private long l", yet the constructor
and setter are taking in an "int". This results in failures in the checks
that JPOX makes. Is this intentional ?
I would refer to 14.6.12
<spec>
if no public field matches the name and type, a public “set” method that
returns void and matches the name of the result expression and takes a single
parameter which is the exact type of the result expression;
</spec>
The type must match.
--
Andy
Re: TCK : ResultClassRequirements test - LongString class
Posted by Michael Watzek <mw...@spree.de>.
Hi Andy,
I checked in the fix (Revision 348189).
Regards,
Michael
> Hi Andy,
>
> this is a bug in class LongString. The parameter "l" in the constructor
> and in the setter must have type long. I'll fix that.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>> The result class LongString has a field "private long l", yet the
>> constructor and setter are taking in an "int". This results in
>> failures in the checks that JPOX makes. Is this intentional ?
>> I would refer to 14.6.12
>> <spec>
>> if no public field matches the name and type, a public “set” method
>> that returns void and matches the name of the result expression and
>> takes a single parameter which is the exact type of the result
>> expression;
>> </spec>
>>
>> The type must match.
>>
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Watzek Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mwa.tech@spree.de Buelowstr. 66
Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany
Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: TCK : ResultClassRequirements test - LongString class
Posted by Michael Watzek <mw...@spree.de>.
Hi Andy,
this is a bug in class LongString. The parameter "l" in the constructor
and in the setter must have type long. I'll fix that.
Regards,
Michael
> The result class LongString has a field "private long l", yet the constructor
> and setter are taking in an "int". This results in failures in the checks
> that JPOX makes. Is this intentional ?
>
> I would refer to 14.6.12
> <spec>
> if no public field matches the name and type, a public “set” method that
> returns void and matches the name of the result expression and takes a single
> parameter which is the exact type of the result expression;
> </spec>
>
> The type must match.
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Watzek Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mwa.tech@spree.de Buelowstr. 66
Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany
Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------