You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Rohit Yadav <bh...@apache.org> on 2013/04/01 10:00:16 UTC
Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following upgrade
> defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little closer to 4.1
> RC.
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more
> keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.
>
Check what happened to create-index-fk.sql, why was it removed and fix
upgrade path from 40 to 410.
> CLOUDSTACK-1856 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3
> parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up.
>
Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file,
this is a packaging issue.
Cheers.
>
> Thanks
> /Sudha
>
Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
On 04/01/2013 10:00 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
> sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following upgrade
>> defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little closer to 4.1
>> RC.
>>
>> CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more
>> keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.
>>
>
> Check what happened to create-index-fk.sql, why was it removed and fix
> upgrade path from 40 to 410.
>
>
>> CLOUDSTACK-1856 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3
>> parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up.
>>
>
> Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file,
> this is a packaging issue.
>
I fixed those things yesterday (I hope/think) with this commit:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=11892d34d7ec0e37e3b5cf568a2a30d4be23590f
See the changes in cloudstack-agent.postinst and
cloudstack-management.postinst
Wido
> Cheers.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> /Sudha
>>
>
Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
Posted by prasanna <sr...@gmail.com>.
>> > CLOUDSTACK-1856 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3
>> > parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up.
>> >
>>
>> Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file, this
>> is a packaging issue.
>
> I see following commit removing these parameters - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-commits/201212.mbox/%3C20121219220428.9E565324537@tyr.zones.apache.org%3E. Are they obsolete now?
That's right. Those properties never come into use anywhere within our code.
--
Prasanna.,
RE: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
Posted by Ram Ganesh <Ra...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rohityadav89@gmail.com [mailto:rohityadav89@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 01 April 2013 13:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
> sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following
> > upgrade defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little
> > closer to 4.1 RC.
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more
> > keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.
> >
>
> Check what happened to create-index-fk.sql, why was it removed and fix
> upgrade path from 40 to 410.
>
>
> > CLOUDSTACK-1856 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3
> > parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up.
> >
>
> Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file, this
> is a packaging issue.
I see following commit removing these parameters - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-commits/201212.mbox/%3C20121219220428.9E565324537@tyr.zones.apache.org%3E. Are they obsolete now?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > /Sudha
> >