You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Jamie Bisotti <jb...@gmail.com> on 2005/05/24 16:25:45 UTC
Flatten resource location on copy
My source tree looks like the following:
src/conf/foo1/blah1.properties
src/conf/foo2/blah2.properties
...
src/conf/fooN/blahN.properties
...
and I'd like for the target tree to look like the following:
target/classes/blah1.properties
target/classes/blah2.properties
...
target/classes/blahN.properties
I could do it with multiple <resource> elements, like this:
<resource>
<directory>${basedir}/src/conf/foo1</directory>
<includes>
<include>*.properties</include>
</includes>
</resource>
...
<resource>
<directory>${basedir}/src/conf/fooN</directory>
<includes>
<include>*.properties</include>
</includes>
</resource>
but, there will be a lot of "foo" subdirectories and I'd like not to
have to add 6 lines for each one to my project.xml. So, I tried the
following:
<resource>
<directory>${basedir}/src/conf</directory>
<includes>
<include>**/*.properties</include>
</includes>
</resource>
However, this creates target/classes/fooN/blahN.properties.
So, is there a way to "flatten"/lose the directory structure on the
resource copy? I didn't go look it up, but I'm pretty sure Ant
provides a way to do that. If it isn't currently possible, does
anyone think it might make a good enhancement?
--
Jamie Bisotti
Software Engineer
Lexmark International, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Flatten resource location on copy
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure if it is a good general enhancements (feel free to
convince me with reasons otherwise).
For your current situation you will have to go with a custom maven.xml
that uses ant:copy with a flatten mapper.
Cheers,
Brett
On 5/26/05, Jamie Bisotti <jb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone???
>
> On 5/24/05, Jamie Bisotti <jb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My source tree looks like the following:
> > src/conf/foo1/blah1.properties
> > src/conf/foo2/blah2.properties
> > ...
> > src/conf/fooN/blahN.properties
> > ...
> >
> > and I'd like for the target tree to look like the following:
> > target/classes/blah1.properties
> > target/classes/blah2.properties
> > ...
> > target/classes/blahN.properties
> >
> > I could do it with multiple <resource> elements, like this:
> > <resource>
> > <directory>${basedir}/src/conf/foo1</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>*.properties</include>
> > </includes>
> > </resource>
> > ...
> > <resource>
> > <directory>${basedir}/src/conf/fooN</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>*.properties</include>
> > </includes>
> > </resource>
> >
> > but, there will be a lot of "foo" subdirectories and I'd like not to
> > have to add 6 lines for each one to my project.xml. So, I tried the
> > following:
> >
> > <resource>
> > <directory>${basedir}/src/conf</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>**/*.properties</include>
> > </includes>
> > </resource>
> >
> > However, this creates target/classes/fooN/blahN.properties.
> >
> > So, is there a way to "flatten"/lose the directory structure on the
> > resource copy? I didn't go look it up, but I'm pretty sure Ant
> > provides a way to do that. If it isn't currently possible, does
> > anyone think it might make a good enhancement?
> >
> > --
> > Jamie Bisotti
> > Software Engineer
> > Lexmark International, Inc.
> >
>
>
> --
> Jamie Bisotti
> Software Engineer
> Lexmark International, Inc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Flatten resource location on copy
Posted by Jamie Bisotti <jb...@gmail.com>.
Anyone???
On 5/24/05, Jamie Bisotti <jb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My source tree looks like the following:
> src/conf/foo1/blah1.properties
> src/conf/foo2/blah2.properties
> ...
> src/conf/fooN/blahN.properties
> ...
>
> and I'd like for the target tree to look like the following:
> target/classes/blah1.properties
> target/classes/blah2.properties
> ...
> target/classes/blahN.properties
>
> I could do it with multiple <resource> elements, like this:
> <resource>
> <directory>${basedir}/src/conf/foo1</directory>
> <includes>
> <include>*.properties</include>
> </includes>
> </resource>
> ...
> <resource>
> <directory>${basedir}/src/conf/fooN</directory>
> <includes>
> <include>*.properties</include>
> </includes>
> </resource>
>
> but, there will be a lot of "foo" subdirectories and I'd like not to
> have to add 6 lines for each one to my project.xml. So, I tried the
> following:
>
> <resource>
> <directory>${basedir}/src/conf</directory>
> <includes>
> <include>**/*.properties</include>
> </includes>
> </resource>
>
> However, this creates target/classes/fooN/blahN.properties.
>
> So, is there a way to "flatten"/lose the directory structure on the
> resource copy? I didn't go look it up, but I'm pretty sure Ant
> provides a way to do that. If it isn't currently possible, does
> anyone think it might make a good enhancement?
>
> --
> Jamie Bisotti
> Software Engineer
> Lexmark International, Inc.
>
--
Jamie Bisotti
Software Engineer
Lexmark International, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org