You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2007/09/19 16:41:00 UTC
[DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think they
are doable.
Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
RE: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
I don't know how much anyone else cares about Aegis, but we have a
supply of untested Aegis code, and a recent track record of discovering
things that got broken on the way from XFire to here. That might be a
reason to try to focus some energy.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bozhong Lin [mailto:blin@iona.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:43 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
>
> Eclipse STP has a dependency on java2ws for its code-first approach
> enhancement, so I think we should consider including java2ws tooling
in
> 2.0.3 release. Right now Eclipse STP guys use 2.1-snapshot for
> development, which is not inconvenient for them.
>
> Other than that, the roadmap looks good to me, certainly plenty
> opportunitie for people to make contributions in large work items such
> as XmlBeans or JiBX databinding support.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for
CXF:
> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
> >
> > I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think
they
> > are doable.
> >
> >
> > Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
> >
> >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
Eclipse STP has a dependency on java2ws for its code-first approach
enhancement, so I think we should consider including java2ws tooling in
2.0.3 release. Right now Eclipse STP guys use 2.1-snapshot for
development, which is not inconvenient for them.
Other than that, the roadmap looks good to me, certainly plenty
opportunitie for people to make contributions in large work items such
as XmlBeans or JiBX databinding support.
Cheers,
Bo
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
>
> I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think they
> are doable.
>
>
> Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
Sorry, just noticed that "This will be done on a branch by selectively
merging fixes from trunk on an as-needed basis"
James
> Hi Dan,
>
> Is it OK to upgrade the api of jaxws and jaxb to 2.1 in the CXF
> 2.0.3? or after?
>
> James
>
>> I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF:
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
>>
>> I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think
>> they are doable.
>>
>>
>> Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
Hi Dan,
Is it OK to upgrade the api of jaxws and jaxb to 2.1 in the CXF 2.0.3?
or after?
James
> I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
>
> I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think they
> are doable.
>
>
> Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF Roadmap....
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com>.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I've started a page on the wiki to try and layout some plans for CXF:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Roadmap
>
> I definitely welcome others to add things to the lists if you think they
> are doable.
>
>
> Also, what do folks think about the timeframes? Too aggressive?
>
>
>
I think this is a good list.
As I've mentioned before, I think the WS-SX stuff is important but due
to recent changes in my life I don't have as much time to work on it as
I had anticipated. I'll try and braindump my thoughts though so we can
have an intelligent discussion about it at some point this weekend :-)
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog