You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> on 2016/10/02 19:33:15 UTC
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Hello
Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
Regards
Philippe
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
>> > contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
>> > released in few days.
>> >
>> Do you know when?
>>
> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>
>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>
>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>
> It may not be simple.
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>> >
>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>
>
> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> I may not have the whole picture.
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>> > >
>> > > Are you ok?
>> > >
>> > > Milamber
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
>> weeks?
>> > I
>> > >> can act as RM.
>> > >>
>> > >> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this release
>> > will
>> > >> be the last with Java 7 support).
>> > >>
>> > >> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next release?
>> > >>
>> > >> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>> indicate
>> > >> now.
>> > >>
>> > >> Milamber
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Great :-)
Antonio
2016-10-21 11:54 GMT+02:00 Milamber <mi...@apache.org>:
>
> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>
> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>
>
>
> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank to the answer
>>
>> On my side, it's ok too
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello,
>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>
>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>> increase
>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> this
>>>>
>>>>> way
>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
>>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>
>>>> on
>>>>
>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>
>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> be
>>>>
>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> 2
>>>>
>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
For me you can proceed.
Thanks in advance.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to
> wait.
>
> Milamber
>
> On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>>>>
>>>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>>>>
>>>> I will do it tomorrow
>>>>
>>> Done
>>
>> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>>>> that we use
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>>>> changes
>>>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>>>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent
>>>> some time
>>>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>>>>
>>>> Done by Felix
>>>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>>>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>>>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>>>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we do that ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
>> features to new comers and old users.
>> It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
>>
>>
>>>> Bon courage !
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Milamber,
>>>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
>>>>> like this in my opinion.
>>>>> It is a medium to major release:
>>>>>
>>>>> - 54 Enhancements
>>>>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>>>>
>>>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version
>>>>> and
>>>>> now available in Report
>>>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
>>>>> images... I think it's important to highlight
>>>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
>>>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
>>>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that
>>>>> before 31/10) *AND
>>>>> *:
>>>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice
>>>>> improvements:
>>>>>
>>>>> - JSON Extractor
>>>>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>>>> - Sane HTML viewer
>>>>> - Performance and memory improvements
>>>>> - ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
>>>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>>>>> increase
>>>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> ');>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>>> ');>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to wait.
Milamber
On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>>>
>>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>>>
>>> I will do it tomorrow
> Done
>
>>> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>>> that we use
>>>
>>> Done.
>>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>>> changes
>>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
>>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>>>
>>> Done by Felix
>>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>>>
>>>
> Should we do that ?
>
>
>
> Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
> features to new comers and old users.
> It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
>
>>>
>>> Bon courage !
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Milamber,
>>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
>>>> like this in my opinion.
>>>> It is a medium to major release:
>>>>
>>>> - 54 Enhancements
>>>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>>>
>>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
>>>> now available in Report
>>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
>>>> images... I think it's important to highlight
>>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
>>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
>>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
>>>> *:
>>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>>>
>>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>>>>
>>>> - JSON Extractor
>>>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>>> - Sane HTML viewer
>>>> - Performance and memory improvements
>>>> - ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>>>
>>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
>>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>>>> increase
>>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@internetallee.de');>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>>
>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>>
>> I will do it tomorrow
>
Done
>
>> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>> that we use
>>
>> Done.
>
>>
>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>> changes
>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>>
>> Done by Felix
>
>>
>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>>
>>
Should we do that ?
Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
features to new comers and old users.
It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
>
>>
>>
>> Bon courage !
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Milamber,
>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
>>> like this in my opinion.
>>> It is a medium to major release:
>>>
>>> - 54 Enhancements
>>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>>
>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
>>> now available in Report
>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
>>> images... I think it's important to highlight
>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
>>> *:
>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>>
>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>>>
>>> - JSON Extractor
>>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>> - Sane HTML viewer
>>> - Performance and memory improvements
>>> - ....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>>
>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>>
>>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>>
>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>>> increase
>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@internetallee.de');>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0077@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release,
>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>
> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>
> I will do it tomorrow
>
> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
> that we use
>
> Done.
>
> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
> changes
> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>
> Done by Felix
>
> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>
>
> Bon courage !
>
> Regards
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Milamber,
>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented like
>> this in my opinion.
>> It is a medium to major release:
>>
>> - 54 Enhancements
>> - 28 Bug fixes
>>
>>
>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>
>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
>> now available in Report
>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big images...
>> I think it's important to highlight
>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon Beanshell
>> and gain performances and Groovy features
>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
>> *:
>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>
>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>>
>> - JSON Extractor
>> - UX in CSV Dataset,
>> - Sane HTML viewer
>> - Performance and memory improvements
>> - ....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>
>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
>>> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>
>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> >:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>> increase
>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
- It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
- Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
that we use
- Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by changes
- Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and some
code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time on
this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
- Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
- jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
- #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
Bon courage !
Regards
Philippe
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Milamber,
> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented like
> this in my opinion.
> It is a medium to major release:
>
> - 54 Enhancements
> - 28 Bug fixes
>
>
> There is a lot of new important features:
>
> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
> now available in Report
> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big images...
> I think it's important to highlight
> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon Beanshell
> and gain performances and Groovy features
> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots need
> to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
> *:
> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
> - new "Response Time Overview" graph
> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>
> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>
> - JSON Extractor
> - UX in CSV Dataset,
> - Sane HTML viewer
> - Performance and memory improvements
> - ....
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Philippe
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>
>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
>> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank to the answer
>>>
>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>
>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>> increase
>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>
>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>
>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> for
>>>>>
>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>
>>>>> on
>>>>>
>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>
>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>> be
>>>>>
>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>> 2
>>>>>
>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hi Milamber,
3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented like
this in my opinion.
It is a medium to major release:
- 54 Enhancements
- 28 Bug fixes
There is a lot of new important features:
- New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
- Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and now
available in Report
- Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big images... I
think it's important to highlight
- Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
- __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon Beanshell
and gain performances and Groovy features
- Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots need
to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
*:
- new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
- new "Response Time Overview" graph
- new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
- new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
- Active Threads Over Time stack lines
In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
- JSON Extractor
- UX in CSV Dataset,
- Sane HTML viewer
- Performance and memory improvements
- ....
Regards
Philippe
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>
> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>
>
>
> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank to the answer
>>
>> On my side, it's ok too
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello,
>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>
>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>> increase
>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> this
>>>>
>>>>> way
>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
>>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>
>>>> on
>>>>
>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>
>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> be
>>>>
>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> 2
>>>>
>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank to the answer
>
> On my side, it's ok too
>
> Antonio
>
> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>
>> - JSON : Felix has a patch
>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase
>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>> this
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
>>> for
>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>
>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>> visibility
>>> on
>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>> to
>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
>> to
>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thank to the answer
On my side, it's ok too
Antonio
2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>
> - JSON : Felix has a patch
> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase
> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> ra0077@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> > > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
> > > >> support Java 8.
> > > >>
> > > >> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
> > this
> > > >> way
> > > >> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
> > > >> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
> > > >> afraid
> > > >> will not be the case.
> > > >>
> > > > I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
> > for
> > > > a short period till the next release.
> > > >
> > > > I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
> > > But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Felix
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Philippe
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > > >> ra0077@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Antonio
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > > >>> >:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello
> > > >>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> > > >>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
> visibility
> > on
> > > >>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards
> > > >>>> Philippe
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > > >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > > >>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> :
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
> > which
> > > >>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
> to
> > be
> > > >>>>>>> released in few days.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do you know when?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> > > >>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> It may not be simple.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> > > >>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Regards
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
> milamber@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Are you ok?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Milamber
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
> to
> > 2
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> weeks?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> can act as RM.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> release?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> indicate
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> now.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Milamber
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cordialement.
> > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
- JSON : Felix has a patch
- Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase
precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
Regards
Philippe
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>
> Antonio
>
> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
> > >> support Java 8.
> > >>
> > >> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
> this
> > >> way
> > >> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
> > >> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
> > >> afraid
> > >> will not be the case.
> > >>
> > > I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
> for
> > > a short period till the next release.
> > >
> > > I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
> > >
> >
> > I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
> > But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Felix
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Philippe
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > >> ra0077@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Antonio
> > >>>
> > >>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > >>> >:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello
> > >>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> > >>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility
> on
> > >>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Philippe
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > >>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > >>>
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
> which
> > >>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to
> be
> > >>>>>>> released in few days.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do you know when?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> > >>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It may not be simple.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> > >>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Are you ok?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Milamber
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to
> 2
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> weeks?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> can act as RM.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> release?
> > >>>
> > >>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> indicate
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> now.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Milamber
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Cordialement.
> > >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Cordialement.
> > >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Cordialement.
> > >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
Antonio
2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
> >> support Java 8.
> >>
> >> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can this
> >> way
> >> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
> >> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
> >> afraid
> >> will not be the case.
> >>
> > I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping for
> > a short period till the next release.
> >
> > I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
> >
>
> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Felix
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> >> ra0077@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>>
> >>> Antonio
> >>>
> >>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >>> >:
> >>>
> >>> Hello
> >>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> >>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
> >>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Philippe
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> >>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
> >>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
> >>>>>>> released in few days.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you know when?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> >>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It may not be simple.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> >>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Are you ok?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Milamber
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> weeks?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> can act as RM.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> release?
> >>>
> >>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> indicate
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Milamber
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Cordialement.
> >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Cordialement.
> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>
>> Hello,
>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>> support Java 8.
>>
>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can this
>> way
>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am
>> afraid
>> will not be the case.
>>
> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping for
> a short period till the next release.
>
> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>
I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>
>>>>> will
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>
>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
> support Java 8.
>
> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can this way
> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am afraid
> will not be the case.
I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
for a short period till the next release.
I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
Regards,
Felix
>
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello
>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>
>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>
>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>
>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>
>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
>>> release
>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
>> release?
>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>
>
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
support Java 8.
So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can this way
include the new Browser feature and this new version.
Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am afraid
will not be the case.
Regards
Philippe
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Antonio
>
> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello
> > Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> > Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
> > release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > > ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> > I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
> > >> > contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
> > >> > released in few days.
> > >> >
> > >> Do you know when?
> > >>
> > > No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> > >
> > >> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> > >>
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> > > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> > >> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> > >>
> > >> +1 to wait to the fix
> > >>
> > > It may not be simple.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> > >> >
> > >> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> > >>
> > >
> > > I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> > > I may not have the whole picture.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hello,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Are you ok?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Milamber
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Hello,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
> > >> weeks?
> > >> > I
> > >> > >> can act as RM.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
> > release
> > >> > will
> > >> > >> be the last with Java 7 support).
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
> release?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> > >> indicate
> > >> > >> now.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Milamber
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Cordialement.
> > >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cordialement.
> > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
Antonio
2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
> Hello
> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real visibility on
> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> > I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd which
> >> > contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed to be
> >> > released in few days.
> >> >
> >> Do you know when?
> >>
> > No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> >
> >> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> >>
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> > https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> >> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> >>
> >> +1 to wait to the fix
> >>
> > It may not be simple.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> >> >
> >> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> >>
> >
> > I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> > I may not have the whole picture.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hello,
> >> > >
> >> > > Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> >> > >
> >> > > Are you ok?
> >> > >
> >> > > Milamber
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hello,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 to 2
> >> weeks?
> >> > I
> >> > >> can act as RM.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this
> release
> >> > will
> >> > >> be the last with Java 7 support).
> >> > >>
> >> > >> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next release?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> >> indicate
> >> > >> now.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Milamber
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>