You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by "Ninck Blok, Jeroen" <je...@logica.com> on 2008/08/14 10:59:01 UTC
SM-1134 / NPE PojoChannel
Hi all,
We have stumbled into ServiceMix bug SM-1134 and we are wondering if
there has been any progress on this bug since it original report in
November 2007.
It looks like a very basic functionality which is not working correctly.
Am I correct on this?
Guillaume, you mentioned that this use case is not really supported
right now and that several modifications are required to support this.
Can you be more specific on these modifications?
Thanks in advance,
Jeroen Ninck Blok
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
RE: SM-1134 / NPE PojoChannel
Posted by "Ninck Blok, Jeroen" <je...@logica.com>.
Gert,
I have attached a patch to SM-1134. I don't think that is fixes the
problem as Guillaume intended, however it does appear to be working and
I did not see any (serious) memory leaks.
Could you have a look at it?
Thanks,
Jeroen Ninck Blok
-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Vanthienen [mailto:gert.vanthienen@skynet.be]
Sent: maandag 25 augustus 2008 8:58
To: users@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: SM-1134 / NPE PojoChannel
Jeroen,
If you look at the servicemix-bean BeanEndpoint class, you'll notice
that everything revolves around the Request object that is being created
on a provider exchange. This object is being used to track callbacks,
but it is also being correlated to every consumer exchange being sent by
the servicemix-bean component -- the original request object is being
retrieved when the response message for the consumer exchange is
received. We also use it to track if/when the original MessageExchange
is done so we can clean up memory.
I think what Guillaume means is that you'll need changes almost
everywhere to accommodate the use case where there is no initial Request
object. Feel free to submit patches for it if you need this behavior and
cannot use the sendSync() workaround for some reason. Just ask for any
help you need implementing this...
Regards,
Gert
Ninck Blok, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We have stumbled into ServiceMix bug SM-1134 and we are wondering if
> there has been any progress on this bug since it original report in
> November 2007.
>
> It looks like a very basic functionality which is not working
correctly.
> Am I correct on this?
>
> Guillaume, you mentioned that this use case is not really supported
> right now and that several modifications are required to support this.
> Can you be more specific on these modifications?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Jeroen Ninck Blok
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are
not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
>
>
>
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
Re: SM-1134 / NPE PojoChannel
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@skynet.be>.
Jeroen,
If you look at the servicemix-bean BeanEndpoint class, you'll notice
that everything revolves around the Request object that is being created
on a provider exchange. This object is being used to track callbacks,
but it is also being correlated to every consumer exchange being sent by
the servicemix-bean component -- the original request object is being
retrieved when the response message for the consumer exchange is
received. We also use it to track if/when the original MessageExchange
is done so we can clean up memory.
I think what Guillaume means is that you'll need changes almost
everywhere to accommodate the use case where there is no initial Request
object. Feel free to submit patches for it if you need this behavior and
cannot use the sendSync() workaround for some reason. Just ask for any
help you need implementing this...
Regards,
Gert
Ninck Blok, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We have stumbled into ServiceMix bug SM-1134 and we are wondering if
> there has been any progress on this bug since it original report in
> November 2007.
>
> It looks like a very basic functionality which is not working correctly.
> Am I correct on this?
>
> Guillaume, you mentioned that this use case is not really supported
> right now and that several modifications are required to support this.
> Can you be more specific on these modifications?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Jeroen Ninck Blok
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
>
>
>