You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2022/02/08 12:31:08 UTC

Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Hi all,

Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of
javax.activation?

I'm more particularly pointing org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils which
requires its presence whereas it should be optional AFAIK so
InputStreamDataSource shouldn't be hardcoded IMO.


Wdyt?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Re: Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Sure, here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8654 :)

Think it is simple enough to not be worth a PR but happy to jump on it if
it helps too.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 8 févr. 2022 à 14:08, Andriy Redko <dr...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hey Romain,
>
> Sneaked in while we were fixing the JAX-RS TCK tests, certainly should be
> optional,
> could you please create a JIRA ticket? Thank you.
>
> Best Regards,
>     Andriy Redko
>
> RMB> Hi all,
>
> RMB> Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of
> RMB> javax.activation?
>
> RMB> I'm more particularly pointing org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils
> which
> RMB> requires its presence whereas it should be optional AFAIK so
> RMB> InputStreamDataSource shouldn't be hardcoded IMO.
>
>
> RMB> Wdyt?
>
> RMB> Romain Manni-Bucau
> RMB> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> RMB> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> RMB> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> RMB> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> RMB> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>

Re: Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Posted by Andriy Redko <dr...@gmail.com>.
Hey Romain,

Sneaked in while we were fixing the JAX-RS TCK tests, certainly should be optional,
could you please create a JIRA ticket? Thank you.

Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko  

RMB> Hi all,

RMB> Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of
RMB> javax.activation?

RMB> I'm more particularly pointing org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils which
RMB> requires its presence whereas it should be optional AFAIK so
RMB> InputStreamDataSource shouldn't be hardcoded IMO.


RMB> Wdyt?

RMB> Romain Manni-Bucau
RMB> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
RMB> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
RMB> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
RMB> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
RMB> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>