You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Li Feng Wang <ph...@gmail.com> on 2012/07/09 05:35:10 UTC
[QA]Suggest to list specific verify steps or process in Bugzilla
Hi, all,
When I verify AOO3.4.1 resolved release blocker defects in Bugzilla, I
found there may be some understanding not consistent about defect, between
defect reporter and verify tester.
For better verify, I suggest to describe verify steps or process when
change defect status to Confirmed or Closed.
--
Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang
Re: [QA]Suggest to list specific verify steps or process in Bugzilla
Posted by lou ql <lo...@gmail.com>.
agree. and I will follow this when file, confirm and verify bugs.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Li Feng Wang <ph...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> When I verify AOO3.4.1 resolved release blocker defects in Bugzilla, I
> found there may be some understanding not consistent about defect, between
> defect reporter and verify tester.
> For better verify, I suggest to describe verify steps or process when
> change defect status to Confirmed or Closed.
>
> --
> Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang
>
Re: [QA]Suggest to list specific verify steps or process in Bugzilla
Posted by Shenfeng Liu <li...@gmail.com>.
+1
That's definitely a good thing to do. :)
2012/7/9 Li Feng Wang <ph...@gmail.com>
> Hi, all,
>
> When I verify AOO3.4.1 resolved release blocker defects in Bugzilla, I
> found there may be some understanding not consistent about defect, between
> defect reporter and verify tester.
> For better verify, I suggest to describe verify steps or process when
> change defect status to Confirmed or Closed.
>
> --
> Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang
>