You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Terry <td...@gmail.com> on 2006/03/18 07:26:15 UTC

ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

I am not on a natted machine but it is firewalled.  So, I set
trusted_networks to my local machine IP because that's really the only
one I trust.  I am still, after setting this, getting spams with
negative scores.  What am I missing?

Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Terry <td...@gmail.com>.
On 3/18/06, mouss <us...@free.fr> wrote:
> Terry a écrit :
> > Actually,
> >
> > I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
> > header to show up to even start debugging.
>
> What tells you you "got the ALL_TRUSTED" if you don't get a header?
>
>  SA is being called from
> > amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
> >
> > $sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
> > $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;
> > $sa_kill_level_deflt = 5.0;
> > $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 9;
> > $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 20;
> >
> > The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
> > relevant header I am getting is:
> > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
>
> amavisd only adds spam headers for mail destined to "local domains" (as
> configured in amavisd.conf).

This was the problem.  I have several domains and the one I was
testing was not in that my domain list.  haha, thanks.

Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by mouss <us...@free.fr>.
Terry a écrit :
> Actually,
> 
> I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
> header to show up to even start debugging. 

What tells you you "got the ALL_TRUSTED" if you don't get a header?

 SA is being called from
> amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
> 
> $sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;
> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 5.0;
> $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 9;
> $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 20;
> 
> The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
> relevant header I am getting is:
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
> 
> Any ideas?
> 

amavisd only adds spam headers for mail destined to "local domains" (as
configured in amavisd.conf).


Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>.
Terry wrote:
> Actually,
>
> I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
> header to show up to even start debugging.  SA is being called from
> amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
>
> $sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;
> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 5.0;
> $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 9;
> $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 20;
>
> The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
> relevant header I am getting is:
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
>
> Any ideas?

Amavis does it's own markups by default.. If I recall correctly there's
something about "fast spamassassin" you can turn off to change how this
is done, but I'm no amavis expert.

Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Terry <td...@gmail.com>.
On 3/18/06, Bill Randle <bi...@neocat.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:54 -0600, Terry wrote:
> > Actually,
> >
> > I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
> > header to show up to even start debugging.  SA is being called from
> > amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
> >
> > $sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
> ...
> > The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
> > relevant header I am getting is:
> > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> I'm not sure about setting $sa_tag_level_deflt to undef. I usually set
> it to -99.0 to force the header to always get inserted.
>
>        -Bill

Setting that didn't work either.

Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by mouss <us...@free.fr>.
Bill Randle a écrit :
> On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:54 -0600, Terry wrote:
> 
>>Actually,
>>
>>I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
>>header to show up to even start debugging.  SA is being called from
>>amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
>>
>>$sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
> 
> ...
> 
>>The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
>>relevant header I am getting is:
>>X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
>>
>>Any ideas?
> 
> 
> I'm not sure about setting $sa_tag_level_deflt to undef. I usually set
> it to -99.0 to force the header to always get inserted.

undef is better (-99 is just arbitrary).


Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Bill Randle <bi...@neocat.org>.
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:54 -0600, Terry wrote:
> Actually,
> 
> I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
> header to show up to even start debugging.  SA is being called from
> amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:
> 
> $sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
...
> The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
> relevant header I am getting is:
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org
> 
> Any ideas?

I'm not sure about setting $sa_tag_level_deflt to undef. I usually set
it to -99.0 to force the header to always get inserted.

	-Bill



Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Terry <td...@gmail.com>.
Actually,

I got the ALL_TRUSTED I think but I cannot get the x-spam-status
header to show up to even start debugging.  SA is being called from
amavisd.  I have these settings in amavisd.conf:

$sa_tag_level_deflt  = undef;
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 5.0;
$sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 9;
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 20;

The first one says I should get headers no matter what, no?  Only
relevant header I am getting is:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at domain.org

Any ideas?


On 3/18/06, Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Terry wrote:
> > I am not on a natted machine but it is firewalled.  So, I set
> > trusted_networks to my local machine IP because that's really the only
> > one I trust.  I am still, after setting this, getting spams with
> > negative scores.  What am I missing?
> >
> >
> Are the negative scoring messages still matching ALL_TRUSTED? or are
> they getting negative scores something else?
>
> Can you post an X-Spam-Status header as a sample?
>

Re: ALL TRUSTED - not natted - getting negative scored spam

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>.
Terry wrote:
> I am not on a natted machine but it is firewalled.  So, I set
> trusted_networks to my local machine IP because that's really the only
> one I trust.  I am still, after setting this, getting spams with
> negative scores.  What am I missing?
>
>   
Are the negative scoring messages still matching ALL_TRUSTED? or are
they getting negative scores something else?

Can you post an X-Spam-Status header as a sample?