You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/19 07:59:08 UTC
[DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Hi All,
Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not been
included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
sca/java/demos:
load-balancing-webapp
workpool-distributed
sca/java/itest:
admin
binding-sca-jms
contribution-classloader
domain
interop-soap-client
interop-soap-round2-client
interop-soap-service
osgi-tuscany
promotion-interface-mismatch
sca/java/samples:
calculator2
calculator-osgi
calculator-rcp
callbacks-jms
chat2-webapp
domain-management
domain-webapp
helloworld-bpel-ws
helloworld-distributed
helloworld-jsp
helloworld-servlet
helloworld-web
helloworld-web-callback
helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
helloworld-ws-service-webapp
spi-implementation-pojo
I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get included
as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me understand?
Thanks.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Haaa, i see, the jackrabit dependencies...
> Well, Let me clean that out and maybe we could still add it... is that ok ?
>
>
Yeah that sound ok to me.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Haaa, i see, the jackrabit dependencies...
Well, Let me clean that out and maybe we could still add it... is that ok ?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
> The photo-gallery module seems to be excluded from the previous releases as
> well.
>
> Not sure about the exact reason, but what I can make out is that this module
> is uniquely dependent
> on a few number of jar files which is not shared by any other modules.
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> What do we need in order to get photo-gallery in the release ?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> > I apologize for the delay in response, I agree with the suggestions
>> > given by
>> > Ant and Luciano and have been working on those terms.
>> >
>> > I have been just waiting to post the consolidated list of modules that
>> > will
>> > be excluded only from the distribution.
>> >
>> > Here are the final list of modules:
>> >
>> > sca/java/demos:
>> > load-balancing-webapp
>> > workpool-distributed
>> >
>> > sca/java/itest:
>> > admin
>> > contribution-classloader
>> > domain
>> > interop-soap-client
>> > interop-soap-round2-client
>> > interop-soap-service
>> > osgi-tuscany
>> > promotion-interface-mismatch
>> >
>> > sca/java/samples:
>> > calculator2
>> > calculator-osgi
>> > calculator-rcp
>> > calculator-corba-reference
>> > calculator-corba-service
>> > calculator-ws-secure-webapp
>> > chat2-webapp
>> > customer-dojo
>> > customer-dojo-webapp
>> > domain-webapp
>> > helloworld-distributed
>> > helloworld-jsp
>> > helloworld-servlet
>> > helloworld-web
>> > helloworld-web-callback
>> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
>> > helloworld-jms-webapp
>> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
>> > helloworld-ws-reference-lean
>> > photo-gallary
>> > loanapplication
>> > spi-implementation-pojo
>> >
>> > Please let me know if there are any concerns on these consolidate list.
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:16 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> That sounds like a good approach.
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Ram
>> >>>
>> >>> I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
>> >>> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
>> >>> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
>> >>> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
>> >>> modules and make everybody happy :)
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> 1.4
>> >>> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no
>> >>> >> need
>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up
>> >>> >> in
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> 2.x trunk.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and
>> >>> >> binding-sca-jms
>> >>> >> as
>> >>> >> well
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> ...ant
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Hi Simon,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
>> >>> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Hi Ant,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this
>> >>> > could
>> >>> > be
>> >>> > removed.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take
>> >>> > care
>> >>> > of
>> >>> > this.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty
>> >>> > long
>> >>> > time.
>> >>> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty
>> >>> > old
>> >>> > and
>> >>> > not used?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> >>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Luciano Resende
>> >>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
The photo-gallery module seems to be excluded from the previous releases as
well.
Not sure about the exact reason, but what I can make out is that this module
is uniquely dependent
on a few number of jar files which is not shared by any other modules.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> What do we need in order to get photo-gallery in the release ?
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I apologize for the delay in response, I agree with the suggestions given
> by
> > Ant and Luciano and have been working on those terms.
> >
> > I have been just waiting to post the consolidated list of modules that
> will
> > be excluded only from the distribution.
> >
> > Here are the final list of modules:
> >
> > sca/java/demos:
> > load-balancing-webapp
> > workpool-distributed
> >
> > sca/java/itest:
> > admin
> > contribution-classloader
> > domain
> > interop-soap-client
> > interop-soap-round2-client
> > interop-soap-service
> > osgi-tuscany
> > promotion-interface-mismatch
> >
> > sca/java/samples:
> > calculator2
> > calculator-osgi
> > calculator-rcp
> > calculator-corba-reference
> > calculator-corba-service
> > calculator-ws-secure-webapp
> > chat2-webapp
> > customer-dojo
> > customer-dojo-webapp
> > domain-webapp
> > helloworld-distributed
> > helloworld-jsp
> > helloworld-servlet
> > helloworld-web
> > helloworld-web-callback
> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> > helloworld-jms-webapp
> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> > helloworld-ws-reference-lean
> > photo-gallary
> > loanapplication
> > spi-implementation-pojo
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any concerns on these consolidate list.
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:16 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> That sounds like a good approach.
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ram
> >>>
> >>> I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
> >>> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
> >>> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
> >>> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
> >>> modules and make everybody happy :)
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from
> the
> >>> >> 1.4
> >>> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no
> need
> >>> >> to
> >>> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up
> in
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> 2.x trunk.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and
> binding-sca-jms
> >>> >> as
> >>> >> well
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ...ant
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi Simon,
> >>> >
> >>> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
> >>> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi Ant,
> >>> >
> >>> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be
> to
> >>> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this
> could
> >>> > be
> >>> > removed.
> >>> >
> >>> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take
> care
> >>> > of
> >>> > this.
> >>> >
> >>> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of
> the
> >>> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty
> >>> > long
> >>> > time.
> >>> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty
> old
> >>> > and
> >>> > not used?
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Thanks & Regards,
> >>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Luciano Resende
> >>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
What do we need in order to get photo-gallery in the release ?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I apologize for the delay in response, I agree with the suggestions given by
> Ant and Luciano and have been working on those terms.
>
> I have been just waiting to post the consolidated list of modules that will
> be excluded only from the distribution.
>
> Here are the final list of modules:
>
> sca/java/demos:
> load-balancing-webapp
> workpool-distributed
>
> sca/java/itest:
> admin
> contribution-classloader
> domain
> interop-soap-client
> interop-soap-round2-client
> interop-soap-service
> osgi-tuscany
> promotion-interface-mismatch
>
> sca/java/samples:
> calculator2
> calculator-osgi
> calculator-rcp
> calculator-corba-reference
> calculator-corba-service
> calculator-ws-secure-webapp
> chat2-webapp
> customer-dojo
> customer-dojo-webapp
> domain-webapp
> helloworld-distributed
> helloworld-jsp
> helloworld-servlet
> helloworld-web
> helloworld-web-callback
> helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> helloworld-jms-webapp
> helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> helloworld-ws-reference-lean
> photo-gallary
> loanapplication
> spi-implementation-pojo
>
> Please let me know if there are any concerns on these consolidate list.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:16 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds like a good approach.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ram
>>>
>>> I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
>>> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
>>> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
>>> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
>>> modules and make everybody happy :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the
>>> >> 1.4
>>> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need
>>> >> to
>>> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in
>>> >> the
>>> >> 2.x trunk.
>>> >>
>>> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms
>>> >> as
>>> >> well
>>> >>
>>> >> ...ant
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Hi Simon,
>>> >
>>> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
>>> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi Ant,
>>> >
>>> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
>>> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could
>>> > be
>>> > removed.
>>> >
>>> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care
>>> > of
>>> > this.
>>> >
>>> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
>>> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty
>>> > long
>>> > time.
>>> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old
>>> > and
>>> > not used?
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luciano Resende
>>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
I apologize for the delay in response, I agree with the suggestions given by
Ant and Luciano and have been working on those terms.
I have been just waiting to post the consolidated list of modules that will
be excluded only from the distribution.
Here are the final list of modules:
sca/java/demos:
load-balancing-webapp
workpool-distributed
sca/java/itest:
admin
contribution-classloader
domain
interop-soap-client
interop-soap-round2-client
interop-soap-service
osgi-tuscany
promotion-interface-mismatch
sca/java/samples:
calculator2
calculator-osgi
calculator-rcp
calculator-corba-reference
calculator-corba-service
calculator-ws-secure-webapp
chat2-webapp
customer-dojo
customer-dojo-webapp
domain-webapp
helloworld-distributed
helloworld-jsp
helloworld-servlet
helloworld-web
helloworld-web-callback
helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
helloworld-jms-webapp
helloworld-ws-service-webapp
helloworld-ws-reference-lean
photo-gallary
loanapplication
spi-implementation-pojo
Please let me know if there are any concerns on these consolidate list.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:16 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That sounds like a good approach.
>
> ...ant
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Ram
>>
>> I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
>> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
>> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
>> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
>> modules and make everybody happy :)
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the
>> 1.4
>> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need
>> to
>> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in
>> the
>> >> 2.x trunk.
>> >>
>> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms
>> as
>> >> well
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
>> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Ant,
>> >
>> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
>> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could
>> be
>> > removed.
>> >
>> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care
>> of
>> > this.
>> >
>> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
>> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty
>> long
>> > time.
>> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old
>> and
>> > not used?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
That sounds like a good approach.
...ant
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Ram
>
> I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
> modules and make everybody happy :)
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the
> 1.4
> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need
> to
> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in
> the
> >> 2.x trunk.
> >>
> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms
> as
> >> well
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
> >
> >
> > Hi Ant,
> >
> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could
> be
> > removed.
> >
> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care
> of
> > this.
> >
> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty long
> > time.
> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old
> and
> > not used?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Ram
I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
modules and make everybody happy :)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the 1.4
>> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need to
>> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in the
>> 2.x trunk.
>>
>> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms as
>> well
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> You are right, I proposed to remove them from
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
>
>
> Hi Ant,
>
> The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
> included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could be
> removed.
>
> Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care of
> this.
>
> For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
> distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty long
> time.
> Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old and
> not used?
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the 1.4
> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need to
> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in the
> 2.x trunk.
>
> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms as
> well
>
> ...ant
>
>
Hi Simon,
You are right, I proposed to remove them from (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
Hi Ant,
The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could be
removed.
Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care of
this.
For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty long
time.
Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old and
not used?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After getting some comments from Luciano, Ant and Simon and also verifying
>> with the previous release branches,
>> here is the list of modules that I believe could be removed from the
>> trunk.
>>
>> sca/java/itest:
>> admin
>> binding-sca-jms
>> contribution-classloader
>> domain
>> promotion-interface-mismatch
>>
>> sca/java/samples:
>> calculator2
>> callbacks-jms
>> chat2-webapp
>> domain-webapp
>> helloworld-bpel-ws
>> helloworld-distributed
>> helloworld-jsp
>> helloworld-servlet
>> helloworld-web
>> helloworld-web-callback
>>
>> I will raise a JIRA to remove this modules from the trunk for sca-java-1.x
>> branch.
>>
>> Please let me know if there are any other concerns in doing so. Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ram
>>>
>>> Some more comments in line.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > Branch:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
>>>> >
>>>> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not
>>>> been
>>>> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
>>>> >
>>>> > sca/java/demos:
>>>> > load-balancing-webapp
>>>>
>>> Not part of build as I couldn't work out how to deploy Apache HTTPD
>>> automatically.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > workpool-distributed
>>>>
>>> Giorgio was working on this and I don't think it's finished
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > sca/java/itest:
>>>> > admin
>>>>
>>> very old. don't know what it does
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > binding-sca-jms
>>>> > contribution-classloader
>>>> > domain
>>>>
>>> old and needs to be removed
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > interop-soap-client
>>>> > interop-soap-round2-client
>>>> > interop-soap-service
>>>>
>>>> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>>>>
>>>> > osgi-tuscany
>>>>
>>> This is the original test for tuscany running in an OSGI framework. We
>>> haven't included this in the main build
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > promotion-interface-mismatch
>>>> >
>>>> > sca/java/samples:
>>>> > calculator2
>>>> > calculator-osgi
>>>> > calculator-rcp
>>>>
>>>> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>>>>
>>>> > callbacks-jms
>>>> > chat2-webapp
>>>> > domain-management
>>>> > domain-webapp
>>>>
>>> Old and should be removed
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > helloworld-bpel-ws
>>>> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>>>>
>>>> > helloworld-distributed
>>>> > helloworld-jsp
>>>> > helloworld-servlet
>>>> > helloworld-web
>>>> > helloworld-web-callback
>>>> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
>>>> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
>>>> > spi-implementation-pojo
>>>> >
>>>> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
>>>> included
>>>> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
>>>> >
>>>> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
>>>> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
>>>> understand?
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
>>>> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>>>>
>>>> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
>>>> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
>>>> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> > --
>>>> > Thanks & Regards,
>>>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>
>
> Hi Ram,
>
> just to be clear, you are proposing to remove them from (
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/) right?
>
> Simon
>
Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the 1.4
release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need to
delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in the
2.x trunk.
The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms as
well
...ant
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After getting some comments from Luciano, Ant and Simon and also verifying
> with the previous release branches,
> here is the list of modules that I believe could be removed from the trunk.
>
> sca/java/itest:
> admin
> binding-sca-jms
> contribution-classloader
> domain
> promotion-interface-mismatch
>
> sca/java/samples:
> calculator2
> callbacks-jms
> chat2-webapp
> domain-webapp
> helloworld-bpel-ws
> helloworld-distributed
> helloworld-jsp
> helloworld-servlet
> helloworld-web
> helloworld-web-callback
>
> I will raise a JIRA to remove this modules from the trunk for sca-java-1.x
> branch.
>
> Please let me know if there are any other concerns in doing so. Thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ram
>>
>> Some more comments in line.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
>>> >
>>> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not
>>> been
>>> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
>>> >
>>> > sca/java/demos:
>>> > load-balancing-webapp
>>>
>> Not part of build as I couldn't work out how to deploy Apache HTTPD
>> automatically.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > workpool-distributed
>>>
>> Giorgio was working on this and I don't think it's finished
>>
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > sca/java/itest:
>>> > admin
>>>
>> very old. don't know what it does
>>
>>>
>>> > binding-sca-jms
>>> > contribution-classloader
>>> > domain
>>>
>> old and needs to be removed
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > interop-soap-client
>>> > interop-soap-round2-client
>>> > interop-soap-service
>>>
>>> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>>>
>>> > osgi-tuscany
>>>
>> This is the original test for tuscany running in an OSGI framework. We
>> haven't included this in the main build
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > promotion-interface-mismatch
>>> >
>>> > sca/java/samples:
>>> > calculator2
>>> > calculator-osgi
>>> > calculator-rcp
>>>
>>> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>>>
>>> > callbacks-jms
>>> > chat2-webapp
>>> > domain-management
>>> > domain-webapp
>>>
>> Old and should be removed
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > helloworld-bpel-ws
>>> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>>>
>>> > helloworld-distributed
>>> > helloworld-jsp
>>> > helloworld-servlet
>>> > helloworld-web
>>> > helloworld-web-callback
>>> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
>>> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
>>> > spi-implementation-pojo
>>> >
>>> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
>>> included
>>> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
>>> >
>>> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
>>> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
>>> understand?
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
>>> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>>>
>>> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
>>> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
>>> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
>>> now.
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luciano Resende
>>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
Hi Ram,
just to be clear, you are proposing to remove them from (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/) right?
Simon
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
After getting some comments from Luciano, Ant and Simon and also verifying
with the previous release branches,
here is the list of modules that I believe could be removed from the trunk.
sca/java/itest:
admin
binding-sca-jms
contribution-classloader
domain
promotion-interface-mismatch
sca/java/samples:
calculator2
callbacks-jms
chat2-webapp
domain-webapp
helloworld-bpel-ws
helloworld-distributed
helloworld-jsp
helloworld-servlet
helloworld-web
helloworld-web-callback
I will raise a JIRA to remove this modules from the trunk for sca-java-1.x
branch.
Please let me know if there are any other concerns in doing so. Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Ram
>
> Some more comments in line.
>
> Simon
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
>> >
>> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not
>> been
>> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
>> >
>> > sca/java/demos:
>> > load-balancing-webapp
>>
> Not part of build as I couldn't work out how to deploy Apache HTTPD
> automatically.
>
>
>>
>> > workpool-distributed
>>
> Giorgio was working on this and I don't think it's finished
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > sca/java/itest:
>> > admin
>>
> very old. don't know what it does
>
>>
>> > binding-sca-jms
>> > contribution-classloader
>> > domain
>>
> old and needs to be removed
>
>
>>
>> > interop-soap-client
>> > interop-soap-round2-client
>> > interop-soap-service
>>
>> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>>
>> > osgi-tuscany
>>
> This is the original test for tuscany running in an OSGI framework. We
> haven't included this in the main build
>
>
>>
>> > promotion-interface-mismatch
>> >
>> > sca/java/samples:
>> > calculator2
>> > calculator-osgi
>> > calculator-rcp
>>
>> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>>
>> > callbacks-jms
>> > chat2-webapp
>> > domain-management
>> > domain-webapp
>>
> Old and should be removed
>
>
>>
>> > helloworld-bpel-ws
>> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>>
>> > helloworld-distributed
>> > helloworld-jsp
>> > helloworld-servlet
>> > helloworld-web
>> > helloworld-web-callback
>> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
>> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
>> > spi-implementation-pojo
>> >
>> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
>> included
>> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
>> >
>> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
>> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
>> understand?
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>>
>> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
>> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>>
>> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
>> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
>> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
>> now.
>>
>> > --
>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Ram
Some more comments in line.
Simon
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
> >
> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not been
> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
> >
> > sca/java/demos:
> > load-balancing-webapp
>
Not part of build as I couldn't work out how to deploy Apache HTTPD
automatically.
>
> > workpool-distributed
>
Giorgio was working on this and I don't think it's finished
>
> >
> > sca/java/itest:
> > admin
>
very old. don't know what it does
>
> > binding-sca-jms
> > contribution-classloader
> > domain
>
old and needs to be removed
>
> > interop-soap-client
> > interop-soap-round2-client
> > interop-soap-service
>
> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>
> > osgi-tuscany
>
This is the original test for tuscany running in an OSGI framework. We
haven't included this in the main build
>
> > promotion-interface-mismatch
> >
> > sca/java/samples:
> > calculator2
> > calculator-osgi
> > calculator-rcp
>
> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>
> > callbacks-jms
> > chat2-webapp
> > domain-management
> > domain-webapp
>
Old and should be removed
>
> > helloworld-bpel-ws
> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>
> > helloworld-distributed
> > helloworld-jsp
> > helloworld-servlet
> > helloworld-web
> > helloworld-web-callback
> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> > spi-implementation-pojo
> >
> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
> included
> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
> >
> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
> understand?
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>
> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
> now.
>
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
> >
> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not been
> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
> >
> > sca/java/demos:
> > load-balancing-webapp
> > workpool-distributed
> >
> > sca/java/itest:
> > admin
> > binding-sca-jms
> > contribution-classloader
> > domain
> > interop-soap-client
> > interop-soap-round2-client
> > interop-soap-service
>
> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>
> > osgi-tuscany
> > promotion-interface-mismatch
> >
> > sca/java/samples:
> > calculator2
> > calculator-osgi
> > calculator-rcp
>
> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>
> > callbacks-jms
> > chat2-webapp
> > domain-management
> > domain-webapp
> > helloworld-bpel-ws
> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>
> > helloworld-distributed
> > helloworld-jsp
> > helloworld-servlet
> > helloworld-web
> > helloworld-web-callback
> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> > spi-implementation-pojo
> >
> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
> included
> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
> >
> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
> understand?
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>
> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
> now.
>
>
The way this has been done in the past is that everything is included in the
release unless there is a good reason not to, eg something like it doesn't
build, or drags in lots of dependencies and its deemed not ready, or someone
specifically asks to have something they are still working on not included,
etc.
...ant
Re: [DISCUSS] Modules not included in the parent .pom file
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
>
> Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not been
> included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
>
> sca/java/demos:
> load-balancing-webapp
> workpool-distributed
>
> sca/java/itest:
> admin
> binding-sca-jms
> contribution-classloader
> domain
> interop-soap-client
> interop-soap-round2-client
> interop-soap-service
The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
> osgi-tuscany
> promotion-interface-mismatch
>
> sca/java/samples:
> calculator2
> calculator-osgi
> calculator-rcp
I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
> callbacks-jms
> chat2-webapp
> domain-management
> domain-webapp
> helloworld-bpel-ws
This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
> helloworld-distributed
> helloworld-jsp
> helloworld-servlet
> helloworld-web
> helloworld-web-callback
> helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> spi-implementation-pojo
>
> I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get included
> as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
>
> But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
> mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me understand?
> Thanks.
>
I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
now.
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/