You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/01/01 18:06:10 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32910] New: -
Chainsaw Client socket
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32910>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32910
Summary: Chainsaw Client socket
Product: Log4j
Version: 1.3alpha
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: chainsaw
AssignedTo: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
ReportedBy: brill@pappin.ca
CC: brill@pappin.ca
There doesn't seem to be any way to create a client socket for connection to a
remote appender, such as a SocketHubAppender.
It would be nice if Chainsaw could connect to an already running node in order
to receive events there where distributed by that node.
I don't know about anyone else, but Chainsaw is pretty much useless to me, if it
can't do that.
I am willing to implement this feature is no one else wants to do it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org