RE: What should we do with noncopyable.h?

[Alan Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>]

Yes. That's now a language feature, we should KIWF.

-----Original Message-----
From: Masakazu Kitajo <m4...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:28 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: What should we do with noncopyable.h?

I'd say get rid of it (when we delete the C++ API). I don't like having that kind of general utility in our tree.

Masakazu

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 7:20 AM Walt Karas <wk...@yahooinc.com.invalid>
wrote:

>
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/include/tscpp/api/
> noncopyable.h
>
> Given that the C++ API is deprecated in 10 and will be deleted in 11.
> Should we get rid of noncopyable (since it's less useful in C++11 and 
> later)?  Or, move it to tscpp/util ?
>

Re: [E] RE: What should we do with noncopyable.h?

[Walt Karas <wk...@yahooinc.com.INVALID>]

Looks like the kills win over the abstentions.

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:42 PM Alan Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
wrote:

> Yes. That's now a language feature, we should KIWF.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masakazu Kitajo <m4...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:28 PM
> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
> Subject: Re: What should we do with noncopyable.h?
>
> I'd say get rid of it (when we delete the C++ API). I don't like having
> that kind of general utility in our tree.
>
> Masakazu
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 7:20 AM Walt Karas <wk...@yahooinc.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/include/tscpp/api/__;!!Op6eflyXZCqGR5I!DtAV_NUKzsvyOd7eta3YSBxYbPPgA-oeg4IopWnZVbdK61mfm6bJVjdvI689ZtsH75-U-QyBneu7ZHVKKQfy$
> > noncopyable.h
> >
> > Given that the C++ API is deprecated in 10 and will be deleted in 11.
> > Should we get rid of noncopyable (since it's less useful in C++11 and
> > later)?  Or, move it to tscpp/util ?
> >
>