You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> on 2015/03/25 17:52:49 UTC
[VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
Table and DataTable.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
The name with the most votes is chosen.
If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
Please vote either of these:
+Relation
+Table
+DataTable
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
+DataTable
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +Relation
>
> 2015-03-25 17:52 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>:
>
> > Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >
> > From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> > Table and DataTable.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >
> > Please vote either of these:
> >
> > +Relation
> > +Table
> > +DataTable
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
+Relation
2015-03-25 17:52 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>:
> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>
> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> Table and DataTable.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>
> Please vote either of these:
>
> +Relation
> +Table
> +DataTable
>
Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
Nice, I see the rename is already merged!
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool, looking forward to use this great feature! :-)
> On Mar 29, 2015 12:26 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
> >
> > We have 15 votes:
> > +Relation: 4
> > +DataTable: 3
> > +Table: 8
> >
> > So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> > pull request with the rename and Java support.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> > [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> > > 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> > > 收件人: Hongsibao
> > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> > >
> > >> +Table
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks Henry. :D
> > >> >
> > >> > +Relation
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > +Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> +DataTable
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > >> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>>
> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > +Table
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> > >> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> > >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > +Table API
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> > than
> > >> > >> > Relation.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by
> people
> > >> with
> > >> > a
> > >> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> > more
> > >> the
> > >> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> > >> 25.03.2015
> > >> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> > vote
> > >> > with
> > >> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as
> they
> > >> > appear.
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> > project,
> > >> we
> > >> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> > if I
> > >> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable
> and
> > >> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >> > >>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> > and
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names
> emerged:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a
> new
> > >> vote
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> > below:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> > > To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> > archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> > ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> > > To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> > click here<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> > >.
> > > NAML<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> > list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
Cool, looking forward to use this great feature! :-)
On Mar 29, 2015 12:26 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <al...@apache.org> wrote:
> I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
>
> We have 15 votes:
> +Relation: 4
> +DataTable: 3
> +Table: 8
>
> So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> pull request with the rename and Java support.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> > +Table
> >
> > 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> > 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> > 收件人: Hongsibao
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >
> > +Table
> >
> > 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> >
> >> +Table
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >> >
> >> > +Relation
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > +Table
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +DataTable
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> >> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > +Table
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> >> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> >> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > +Table API
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> than
> >> > >> > Relation.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> >> with
> >> > a
> >> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> more
> >> the
> >> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> >> 25.03.2015
> >> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> >> > with
> >> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> >> > appear.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> ---
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> project,
> >> we
> >> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> if I
> >> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> PS
> >> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> and
> >> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> >> vote
> >> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> > ________________________________
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> > To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> > To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> click here<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> >.
> > NAML<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Great :)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for driving the resolution, Aljoscha
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
> >
> > We have 15 votes:
> > +Relation: 4
> > +DataTable: 3
> > +Table: 8
> >
> > So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> > pull request with the rename and Java support.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >> +Table
> >>
> >> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> >> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> >> 收件人: Hongsibao
> >> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >>
> >> +Table
> >>
> >> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> >>
> >>> +Table
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >>> >
> >>> > +Relation
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > > +Table
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> +DataTable
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> >>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>>
> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > +Table
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> >>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> >>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> >>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > +Table API
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> than
> >>> > >> > Relation.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> >>> with
> >>> > a
> >>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> more
> >>> the
> >>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> >>> 25.03.2015
> >>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> >>> > with
> >>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as
> they
> >>> > appear.
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> ---
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> project,
> >>> we
> >>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> if I
> >>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> > >> > >>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> >>> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> >>> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> PS
> >>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> and
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a
> new
> >>> vote
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> >>
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> >> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> >> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> click here<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> >.
> >> NAML<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for driving the resolution, Aljoscha
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
> I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
>
> We have 15 votes:
> +Relation: 4
> +DataTable: 3
> +Table: 8
>
> So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> pull request with the rename and Java support.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com> wrote:
>> +Table
>>
>> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
>> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
>> 收件人: Hongsibao
>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>>
>> +Table
>>
>> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
>>
>>> +Table
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Henry. :D
>>> >
>>> > +Relation
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > +Table
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
>>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> +DataTable
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
>>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > +Table
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
>>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
>>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
>>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > +Table API
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
>>> > >> > Relation.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
>>> with
>>> > a
>>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
>>> the
>>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
>>> 25.03.2015
>>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>>> > with
>>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
>>> > appear.
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> ---
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
>>> we
>>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
>>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
>>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
>>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> PS
>>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
>>> vote
>>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
>> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
>> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
>> NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
We have 15 votes:
+Relation: 4
+DataTable: 3
+Table: 8
So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
pull request with the rename and Java support.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com> wrote:
> +Table
>
> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> 收件人: Hongsibao
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>
> +Table
>
> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
>
>> +Table
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Henry. :D
>> >
>> > +Relation
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
>> > wrote:
>> > > +Table
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +DataTable
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > +Table
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>> > >> >
>> > >> > +Table API
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
>> > >> > Relation.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
>> with
>> > a
>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
>> the
>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
>> 25.03.2015
>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>> > with
>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
>> > appear.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> ---
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
>> we
>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> PS
>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
>> vote
>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
> NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>.
+Table
发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
收件人: Hongsibao
主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
+Table
2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> +Table
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >
> > +Relation
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +DataTable
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +Table
> > >> >
> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> >
> > >> > +Table API
> > >> >
> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> > >> > Relation.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> with
> > a
> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
> the
> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> 25.03.2015
> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > with
> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> > appear.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
> we
> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Kostas Tzoumas <kt...@apache.org>.
+Table
On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Alexander Alexandrov <
alexander.s.alexandrov@gmail.com> wrote:
> +Table
>
> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>:
>
> > +Table
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Henry. :D
> > >
> > > +Relation
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > +Table
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > > balassi.marton@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +DataTable
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > > >> volker.markl@tu-berlin.de <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > +Table
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org <javascript:;>]
> > > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > > >> > An: dev@flink.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +Table API
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> > > >> > Relation.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> > with
> > > a
> > > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
> > the
> > > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> > 25.03.2015
> > > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fhueske@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > > with
> > > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> > > appear.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> ---
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> project,
> > we
> > > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> if I
> > > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> > > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > > >> > >>> <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > > henry.saputra@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>> PS
> > > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > > >> > >>>>> <aljoscha@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> and
> > > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > > >> > >>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> > > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > > >> > >>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> > vote
> > > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > > >> > >>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > > >> > >>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > > >> > >>>>>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Alexander Alexandrov <al...@gmail.com>.
+Table
2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>:
> +Table
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >
> > +Relation
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +DataTable
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > >> volker.markl@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +Table
> > >> >
> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > An: dev@flink.apache.org
> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> >
> > >> > +Table API
> > >> >
> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> > >> > Relation.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> with
> > a
> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
> the
> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> 25.03.2015
> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > with
> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> > appear.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
> we
> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >>> <va...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> > >>>>> <al...@apache.org>
> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
+Table
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks Henry. :D
>
> +Relation
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > +Table
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +DataTable
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> >> volker.markl@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +Table
> >> >
> >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >> >
> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
> >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> >> > An: dev@flink.apache.org
> >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >> >
> >> > +Table API
> >> >
> >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> >> > Relation.
> >> >
> >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >> > > +Table API / Table
> >> > >
> >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with
> a
> >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
> >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am 25.03.2015
> >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
> >> > >
> >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> with
> >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> appear.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ---
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we
> >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> – Ufuk
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> > >>> <va...@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> +Relation
> >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>>>> +Relation
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> PS
> >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >> > >>>>> <al...@apache.org>
> >> > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> >> > >>>>>> +Table
> >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
Thanks Henry. :D
+Relation
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> +Table
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +DataTable
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
>> volker.markl@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>
>> > +Table
>> >
>> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>> >
>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
>> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
>> > An: dev@flink.apache.org
>> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>> >
>> > +Table API
>> >
>> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
>> > Relation.
>> >
>> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>> > > +Table API / Table
>> > >
>> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
>> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
>> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am 25.03.2015
>> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
>> > >>
>> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote with
>> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>> > >>
>> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
>> > >>
>> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>> > >>
>> > >>> +Table, DataTable
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ---
>> > >>>
>> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we
>> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> – Ufuk
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >>> <va...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> +Relation
>> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>>> +Relation
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> PS
>> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>> > >>>>> <al...@apache.org>
>> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> +Relation
>> > >>>>>> +Table
>> > >>>>>> +DataTable
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
+Table
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +DataTable
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> volker.markl@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > +Table
> >
> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > An: dev@flink.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >
> > +Table API
> >
> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> > Relation.
> >
> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > > +Table API / Table
> > >
> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am 25.03.2015
> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >>
> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote with
> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >>
> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
> > >>
> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>
> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we
> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >>>
> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >>>
> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >>>
> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >>> <va...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +Relation
> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> PS
> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >>>>> <al...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>.
+DataTable
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
volker.markl@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> +Table
>
> I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> An: dev@flink.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>
> +Table API
>
> Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> Relation.
>
> On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > +Table API / Table
> >
> > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
> > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
> > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am 25.03.2015
> > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >>
> >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote with
> >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >>
> >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
> >>
> >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >>> +Table, DataTable
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we
> >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >>>
> >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >>>
> >>> – Ufuk
> >>>
> >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> <va...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +Relation
> >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> +Relation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PS
> >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >>>>> <al...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +Relation
> >>>>>> +Table
> >>>>>> +DataTable
> >>>>>>
> >>>
>
>
AW: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by "Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr." <vo...@tu-berlin.de>.
+Table
I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Timo Walther [mailto:twalthr@apache.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
An: dev@flink.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
+Table API
Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than Relation.
On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +Table API / Table
>
> I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
> deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
> pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am 25.03.2015
> 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>> The mail that started the thread says:
>>
>> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote with
>> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>>
>> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
>>
>> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> +Table, DataTable
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we
>>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>>>
>>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>>>
>>> – Ufuk
>>>
>>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> <va...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +Relation
>>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> +Relation
>>>>>
>>>>> PS
>>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>>>>> <al...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +Relation
>>>>>> +Table
>>>>>> +DataTable
>>>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Timo Walther <tw...@apache.org>.
+Table API
Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than Relation.
On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +Table API / Table
>
> I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
> deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
> pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice)
> Am 25.03.2015 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>> The mail that started the thread says:
>>
>> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>>
>> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
>>
>> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> +Table, DataTable
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we didn't
>>> vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>>>
>>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I vote for
>>> Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and Relation? Will Table
>>> count for DataTable then?
>>>
>>> – Ufuk
>>>
>>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +Relation
>>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> +Relation
>>>>>
>>>>> PS
>>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
>>>>>> Table and DataTable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +Relation
>>>>>> +Table
>>>>>> +DataTable
>>>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
+Table API / Table
I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice)
Am 25.03.2015 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <fh...@gmail.com>:
> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> The mail that started the thread says:
>
> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> with an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>
> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
>
> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>
> > +Table, DataTable
> >
> > ---
> >
> > How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we didn't
> > vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >
> > In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I vote for
> > Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and Relation? Will Table
> > count for DataTable then?
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> > On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +Relation
> > > On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +Relation
> > >>
> > >> PS
> > >> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > >>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >>>
> > >>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> > >>> Table and DataTable.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > >>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote either of these:
> > >>>
> > >>> +Relation
> > >>> +Table
> > >>> +DataTable
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
I think the voting scheme is clear.
The mail that started the thread says:
"The name with the most votes is chosen.
If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
with an alternative voting scheme will be done."
So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appear.
2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> +Table, DataTable
>
> ---
>
> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we didn't
> vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>
> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I vote for
> Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and Relation? Will Table
> count for DataTable then?
>
> – Ufuk
>
> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +Relation
> > On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +Relation
> >>
> >> PS
> >> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> >>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >>>
> >>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> >>> Table and DataTable.
> >>>
> >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> >>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote either of these:
> >>>
> >>> +Relation
> >>> +Table
> >>> +DataTable
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
+Table, DataTable
---
How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
– Ufuk
On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +Relation
> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +Relation
>>
>> PS
>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>>>
>>> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
>>> Table and DataTable.
>>>
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>>>
>>> Please vote either of these:
>>>
>>> +Relation
>>> +Table
>>> +DataTable
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com>.
+Relation
On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +Relation
>
> PS
> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >
> > From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> > Table and DataTable.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >
> > Please vote either of these:
> >
> > +Relation
> > +Table
> > +DataTable
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
+Relation
PS
Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>
> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> Table and DataTable.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>
> Please vote either of these:
>
> +Relation
> +Table
> +DataTable
>