Re: spamassasin: sa-learn --dump magic interpretation good/bad/other?

[Dennis German <DG...@Real-World-Systems.com>]

0) Michael, thanks

1) what are the various  zero columns??
for example in  0.000  0  3  0  non-token data: bayes db version

2) Is this good?  not too good? bad? trouble?

++++++++++++++++++++
On Mar 16, 2009, at 14:03, Michael Scheidell wrote:

>> Is there a document regarding the interpretation of
>>
>>
>> > sa-learn --dump magic
>> config: could not find site rules directory
>>
>> 0.000          0            3          0  non-token data: bayes db  
>> version
>> 0.000          0       261451          0  non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000          0        18530          0  non-token data: nham
>> 0.000          0       143599          0  non-token data: ntokens
>>
>> 0.000          0  1231533845          0  non-token data: oldest atime
>> 0.000          0  1237223892          0  non-token data: newest atime
>> 0.000          0  1237214668          0  non-token data: last  
>> journal sync atime
>> 0.000          0  1237059740          0  non-token data: last  
>> expiry atime
>>
>> 0.000          0    5529600          0  non-token data: last expire  
>> atime delta
>>
>> 0.000          0       9311          0  non-token data: last expire  
>> reduction count
>>
>
> The db version is 3
>
> You have 261,451 tokens that appeared in ‘spam’.
> You have 18,530 tokens that appeard in ‘ham’
>
> You have 143,599 tokens (remember, some tokens could appear in both  
> spam and ham)
>
> The oldest token is date -j -f %s 1231533845
> Fri Jan  9 15:44:05 EST 2009
>
> The newest token is date -j -f %s 1237223892
> Mon Mar 16 13:18:12 EDT 2009