You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Jai Asher <ja...@gmail.com> on 2018/02/09 05:04:17 UTC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Planning for next releases

Hi,
    Rajan and I are planning to start the release process on Monday (12
Feb).
    Is everyone fine with this? If yes then kindly get your PR merged by
Monday.

Regards,
Jai

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Rajan Dhabalia <rd...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, we can target 1.22.0-incubating release by reviewing and merging
> pending PRs by end of this month and then we can prepare for 2.0 release.
>
> >> Also, are there any volunteers for release managers for both releases?
> Sure, I can be release manager for 1.22.0-incubating.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajan
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Matteo Merli <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Since it has already been a while since last release (at least since when
> > we closed the branch for 1.21), I would like to start discussion and from
> > my side propose the following:
> >
> > 1. Release 1.22.0-incubating at the end of this month
> >
> >    We have already a considerable number of fixes and improvement over
> 1.21
> > and we should release that, along with pending PRs. I would suggest
> anyone
> > to mark current changes for either this or next release and help with
> > reviewing them.
> >
> > 2. Prepare for 2.0 Pulsar release for end of February.
> >     We have been discussing a while back to take the opportunity to make
> > some changes in API or tools that break binary compatibility, and do them
> > all at once.
> >     I had created a project in Github to track the proposals:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/projects/4
> >     For this I would also propose to quickly create a branch for 1.22 so
> > that the work that is targeting 2.0 can be merged into master before the
> > release is done.
> >
> > Please anyone share your thoughts on this proposal.
> >
> > Also, are there any volunteers for release managers for both releases? I
> > can also pick up one of them otherwise.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matteo
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <mm...@apache.org>
> >
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Planning for next releases

Posted by Matteo Merli <ma...@gmail.com>.
Sure, can we also start early in creating the 1.22 branch?
We have a lot of changes meant for 2.0 that are waiting to be merged after
1.22.


On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:04 PM Jai Asher <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>     Rajan and I are planning to start the release process on Monday (12
> Feb).
>     Is everyone fine with this? If yes then kindly get your PR merged by
> Monday.
>
> Regards,
> Jai
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Rajan Dhabalia <rd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, we can target 1.22.0-incubating release by reviewing and merging
> > pending PRs by end of this month and then we can prepare for 2.0 release.
> >
> > >> Also, are there any volunteers for release managers for both releases?
> > Sure, I can be release manager for 1.22.0-incubating.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Matteo Merli <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Since it has already been a while since last release (at least since
> when
> > > we closed the branch for 1.21), I would like to start discussion and
> from
> > > my side propose the following:
> > >
> > > 1. Release 1.22.0-incubating at the end of this month
> > >
> > >    We have already a considerable number of fixes and improvement over
> > 1.21
> > > and we should release that, along with pending PRs. I would suggest
> > anyone
> > > to mark current changes for either this or next release and help with
> > > reviewing them.
> > >
> > > 2. Prepare for 2.0 Pulsar release for end of February.
> > >     We have been discussing a while back to take the opportunity to
> make
> > > some changes in API or tools that break binary compatibility, and do
> them
> > > all at once.
> > >     I had created a project in Github to track the proposals:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/projects/4
> > >     For this I would also propose to quickly create a branch for 1.22
> so
> > > that the work that is targeting 2.0 can be merged into master before
> the
> > > release is done.
> > >
> > > Please anyone share your thoughts on this proposal.
> > >
> > > Also, are there any volunteers for release managers for both releases?
> I
> > > can also pick up one of them otherwise.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matteo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > > <mm...@apache.org>
> > >
> >
>
-- 
Matteo Merli
<mm...@apache.org>