You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/21 19:42:23 UTC
build failure: o/a/g/specs vs. geronimo-specs
When I build specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-corba it installs a jar into my
local repo in the o/a/g/spec group:
[INFO] Installing
/home/pmcmahan/src/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/target/geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar
to
/home/pmcmahan/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-spec-corba/1.0/geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar
But then when I build configs/client it looks for
geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar in the geronimo-specs group.
[INFO]------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
----------
1) geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:jar:1.0
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=geronimo-spec
-DartifactId=geronimo-spec-corba \
-Dversion=1.0 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Path to dependency:
1) org.apache.geronimo.configs:client:car:1.2-SNAPSHOT
2) geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:jar:1.0
----------
1 required artifact is missing.
for artifact:
org.apache.geronimo.configs:client:car:1.2-SNAPSHOT
Is the dependency really needed? The client still builds if I remove
it from the pom, but there's a comment about m1 that makes me wonder
if that's safe. If it's needed then shouldn't it depend on
o/a/g/specs instead of geronimo-specs? I've never been totally up to
speed on the differences between these two groups.
BTW, for the time being I worked around this problem by doing this:
cp -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-spec-corba/
~/.m2/repository/geronimo-spec/
Paul
Re: build failure: o/a/g/specs vs. geronimo-specs
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
Have you tried changing geronimo-dependency.xml in
openejb2/modules/openejb-core/src/resources2/META-INF? Please modify
the following line:
<dep:groupId>geronimo-spec</dep:groupId>
to
<dep:groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</dep:groupId>
Thanks
Anita
--- Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I build specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-corba it installs a jar into
> my
> local repo in the o/a/g/spec group:
>
>
> [INFO] Installing
>
/home/pmcmahan/src/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/target/geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar
> to
>
/home/pmcmahan/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-spec-corba/1.0/geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar
>
>
> But then when I build configs/client it looks for
> geronimo-spec-corba-1.0.jar in the geronimo-specs group.
>
>
>
[INFO]------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>
[INFO]------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
>
> Missing:
> ----------
> 1) geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:jar:1.0
>
> Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
>
> Then, install it using the command:
> mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=geronimo-spec
> -DartifactId=geronimo-spec-corba \
> -Dversion=1.0 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
>
> Path to dependency:
> 1) org.apache.geronimo.configs:client:car:1.2-SNAPSHOT
> 2) geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:jar:1.0
>
> ----------
> 1 required artifact is missing.
>
> for artifact:
> org.apache.geronimo.configs:client:car:1.2-SNAPSHOT
>
>
> Is the dependency really needed? The client still builds if I remove
> it from the pom, but there's a comment about m1 that makes me wonder
> if that's safe. If it's needed then shouldn't it depend on
> o/a/g/specs instead of geronimo-specs? I've never been totally up to
> speed on the differences between these two groups.
>
> BTW, for the time being I worked around this problem by doing this:
> cp -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-spec-corba/
> ~/.m2/repository/geronimo-spec/
>
> Paul
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com