You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> on 2017/02/01 16:09:29 UTC
Release vote : 3.2.0
Hello, Jena-folks!
Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
Proposed distributions:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
Git tag:
jena-3.2.0-rc1
4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
ajs6f (A. Soroka)
Checking needed:
• Does everything work on MS Windows?
• Does everything work on OS X?
• Is the GPG signature okay?
• Is there a source archive?
• Can the source archive really be built?
• Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
• Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
• Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
A reply on dev@:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1dc06569517cb15dcf8e6a261d2dec2d0b9bdfc8749f019221d6669b@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E
(cross posting leads to unpredictable "reply-to")
Andy
On 02/02/17 08:12, Lorenz B. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> do we have any release notes so far or is it just the JIRA [1].
> Otherwise, maybe some pointers to things that are really new and how to
> use them would be interesting for users like me.
> So far, I filtered by "new feature" and "improvement" [2], yet some kind
> of documentation would be nice. For me the most interesting parts are
> probably the RDFConnection and the resultset-autoclosable util.
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1283?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20(Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lorenz
>
>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>
>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>
>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>
>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>
>> Proposed distributions:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Git tag:
>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>
>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>
>>
>> Checking needed:
>>
>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by "Lorenz B." <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>.
Hello,
do we have any release notes so far or is it just the JIRA [1].
Otherwise, maybe some pointers to things that are really new and how to
use them would be interesting for users like me.
So far, I filtered by "new feature" and "improvement" [2], yet some kind
of documentation would be nice. For me the most interesting parts are
probably the RDFConnection and the resultset-autoclosable util.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1283?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20(Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
Cheers,
Lorenz
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> • Does everything work on OS X?
> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> • Is there a source archive?
> • Can the source archive really be built?
> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
I think Andy has the right story here (I must have copied it from someone using Linux). In fact, I did the release candidate on a Mac, a fact which will be reflected in my forthcoming vote.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 5:40 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The Apache Jenkins installation has Linux slaves.
>
> There are problems with Windows - there are general problems with temp files getting left around and Jena uses a lot of temp space so it was not playing nice with other jobs on those machines.
>
> There aren't any Mac slaves.
>
> But Java is portable, right? :-)
>
> I think the text was copied from a vote call from someone who ran on Linux, so that test was implicitly done already.
>
> Andy
>
> On 01/02/17 21:27, Dick Murray wrote:
>> ;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
>> for the work.
>>
>> On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
>>> many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
>>> find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
>>> get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
>>> that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
>>>
>>> But maybe I am missing some history?
>>>
>>> ajs6f
>>>
>>>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
>>>> assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
>>>> Centos 7.
>>>>
>>>> If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
>>>>> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
>>>>> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
>>>>> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
>>>>> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
>>>>> servers).
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposed distributions:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>>>>
>>>>> Keys:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Git tag:
>>>>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>>>>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
>>>>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>>
>>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>>
>>>>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>>>>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>>>>> • Is there a source archive?
>>>>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>>>>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>> source
>>>>> and binary artifacts)?
>>>>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>>>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
The Apache Jenkins installation has Linux slaves.
There are problems with Windows - there are general problems with temp
files getting left around and Jena uses a lot of temp space so it was
not playing nice with other jobs on those machines.
There aren't any Mac slaves.
But Java is portable, right? :-)
I think the text was copied from a vote call from someone who ran on
Linux, so that test was implicitly done already.
Andy
On 01/02/17 21:27, Dick Murray wrote:
> ;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
> for the work.
>
> On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
>
>> No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
>> many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
>> find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
>> get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
>> that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
>>
>> But maybe I am missing some history?
>>
>> ajs6f
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
>>> assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
>>> Centos 7.
>>>
>>> If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
>>>
>>> On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>>>
>>>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
>>>> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
>>>> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
>>>> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>>>
>>>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>>>
>>>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
>>>> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
>>>> servers).
>>>>
>>>> Staging repository:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>>>
>>>> Proposed distributions:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>>>
>>>> Keys:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Git tag:
>>>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>>>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
>>>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>
>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
>>>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
>>>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
>>>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
>>>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>> source
>>>> and binary artifacts)?
>>>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com>.
;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs)
for the work.
On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
> No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so
> many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to
> find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to
> get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied
> that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
>
> But maybe I am missing some history?
>
> ajs6f
>
> > On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
> > assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
> > Centos 7.
> >
> > If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
> >
> > On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, Jena-folks!
> >>
> >> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
> >>
> >> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
> >> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
> >> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
> >> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
> >>
> >> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
> >>
> >> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
> >> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
> >> servers).
> >>
> >> Staging repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
> >>
> >> Proposed distributions:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
> >>
> >> Keys:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> >>
> >> Git tag:
> >> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> >> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
> >> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >>
> >> This vote will be open to the end of
> >>
> >> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
> >>
> >> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
> >>
> >>
> >> Checking needed:
> >>
> >> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> >> • Does everything work on OS X?
> >> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> >> • Is there a source archive?
> >> • Can the source archive really be built?
> >> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
> source
> >> and binary artifacts)?
> >> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> >> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied that list from earlier release vote announcements. (!)
But maybe I am missing some history?
ajs6f
> On Feb 1, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
> assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
> Centos 7.
>
> If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
>
> On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>
>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
>> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
>> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
>> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>
>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>
>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
>> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
>> servers).
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>
>> Proposed distributions:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Git tag:
>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>
>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>
>>
>> Checking needed:
>>
>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>> • Is there a source archive?
>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source
>> and binary artifacts)?
>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Dick Murray <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi.
Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena
assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and
Centos 7.
If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-)
On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote:
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's
> from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but
> _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an
> issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database
> gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL
> servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
> • Does everything work on OS X?
> • Is the GPG signature okay?
> • Is there a source archive?
> • Can the source archive really be built?
> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source
> and binary artifacts)?
> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
(added [RESULT])
On 07/02/17 20:47, A. Soroka wrote:
> Okay, folks!
>
> The vote is complete, and the results are straightforward: 3 binding +1 votes, and no other binding votes.
>
> I will begin the process of promoting the release candidate to a release, but not until tomorrow morning.
>
> Thanks, everyone!
>
> ---
> A. Soroka
> The University of Virginia Library
>
>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Successfully built the source distribution on Linux.
>>
>> -Osma
>>
>> 01.02.2017, 18:09, A. Soroka kirjoitti:
>>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>>
>>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>>
>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>>
>>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>>
>>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>>
>>> Proposed distributions:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>>
>>> Git tag:
>>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>
>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>
>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>
>>>
>>> Checking needed:
>>>
>>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
>>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
>>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
>>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
>>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
>>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Osma Suominen
>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
>> National Library of Finland
>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
>> Tel. +358 50 3199529
>> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
Okay, folks!
The vote is complete, and the results are straightforward: 3 binding +1 votes, and no other binding votes.
I will begin the process of promoting the release candidate to a release, but not until tomorrow morning.
Thanks, everyone!
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Successfully built the source distribution on Linux.
>
> -Osma
>
> 01.02.2017, 18:09, A. Soroka kirjoitti:
>> Hello, Jena-folks!
>>
>> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>>
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>>
>> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>>
>> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>>
>> Proposed distributions:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Git tag:
>> jena-3.2.0-rc1
>> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>
>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>
>>
>> Checking needed:
>>
>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>> • Is there a source archive?
>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Osma Suominen
> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
> National Library of Finland
> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
> Tel. +358 50 3199529
> osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
[VOTE] Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>.
+1 (binding)
Successfully built the source distribution on Linux.
-Osma
01.02.2017, 18:09, A. Soroka kirjoitti:
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
(switched to dev@, not marked [VOTE])
These are the headline items I think need to go in the announcement message:
RDF Connection
JENA-1267
http://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/rdfconnection.html
(on staging ATM)
Serializable for Quad/triple/Node
Link to javadoc: org.apache.jena.system.Serializer
JENA-1233
JsonLDReader: possibility to override the @context
JENA-1279
And jsonld-java upgrade to version 0.9.0
jena-spatial - no longer sorts result.
Big performance improvement.
JENA-1277
Andy
On 02/02/17 08:12, Lorenz B. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> do we have any release notes so far or is it just the JIRA [1].
> Otherwise, maybe some pointers to things that are really new and how to
> use them would be interesting for users like me.
> So far, I filtered by "new feature" and "improvement" [2], yet some kind
> of documentation would be nice. For me the most interesting parts are
> probably the RDFConnection and the resultset-autoclosable util.
>
>
>
> [1]
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1283?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
> [2]
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20(Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.2.0%22
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lorenz
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 01/02/17 16:09, A. Soroka wrote:
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
Congratulations!
All looks good to me.
I like the idea of sending it to users@ as well.
The Jenkins development build seems to have got out of sync (I thiunk
this has happened before - my guess is that a crash (a JVM blew up last
run) means the sync state gets messed up). I manually kicked off a
snapshots build.
Andy
Re: Release vote : 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
I've just committed the way I have been building the javadoc - its works
by downloading and caching jars from the maven repo and it build the
javadoc inplace. The caching helps in case it does not thing don't work
first time.
It's updated for jena-rdfconnection (and I just updated svn version of
the site's index.mdtext while I remembered).
Same script name and output as before. Additional notes in Javadoc/README.
The old code is in Javadoc-v0
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
+1 (binding)
The release candidate itself was generated on a Mac, so that's a box checked.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Works on OS X
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>
>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>
>>>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>>
>> Works on Linux.
>>
>>>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>>
>>>> • Is there a source archive?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>>
>> I pick some at random and they look good.
>>
>> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>>
>>>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>> Yes
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for testing!
Andy
On 02/02/17 18:29, Aaron Coburn wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Works on OS X
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>
>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
>>
>> Works on Linux.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>>
>> I pick some at random and they look good.
>>
>> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>> Yes
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu>.
+1 (non-binding)
Works on OS X
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>
>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>
>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>
>>>
>>> Checking needed:
>>>
>>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>
> Works on Linux.
>
>>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>
> Yes
>
> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>
>>> • Is there a source archive?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>
> I pick some at random and they look good.
>
> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>
>>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
> Yes
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>
>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>
>>
>> Checking needed:
>>
>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
Works on Linux.
>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
Yes
And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
Yes
>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
Yes
>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>> source and binary artifacts)?
I pick some at random and they look good.
I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
Yes
>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Yes
[VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Subject line needs to include [VOTE].
There is a dependency change for json-ld to version 0.9.0 (same license).
.... else looks good so far!
Andy
On 01/02/17 16:09, A. Soroka wrote:
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>