SystemProperties dependency

[Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>]

I notice that a lot of the CSSBean and CorbaBean definitions in plans 
include a dependency on SystemProperties?  I'm assuming this is because 
these beans are using System.setProperty() to pass information to the 
socket factories.  If I've managed to eliminate that usage, can I assume 
it's also safe to remove the dependency?

Rick

Re: SystemProperties dependency

[Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

Rick McGuire wrote:
> I notice that a lot of the CSSBean and CorbaBean definitions in plans 
> include a dependency on SystemProperties?  I'm assuming this is 
> because these beans are using System.setProperty() to pass information 
> to the socket factories.  If I've managed to eliminate that usage, can 
> I assume it's also safe to remove the dependency?
>
> Rick
I can't think of any other reason to have it.


Regards,
Alan

Re: SystemProperties dependency

[Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>]

The need for a dep on SystemProperties was only to guarantee that the  
corba related information in the SystemProperties services was set  
into System.getProperties() before the corba services is created.  If  
you don't need system properties, which would be sweet, you can  
remove the dependency.

-dain

On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> I notice that a lot of the CSSBean and CorbaBean definitions in  
> plans include a dependency on SystemProperties?  I'm assuming this  
> is because these beans are using System.setProperty() to pass  
> information to the socket factories.  If I've managed to eliminate  
> that usage, can I assume it's also safe to remove the dependency?
>
> Rick

Re: SystemProperties dependency

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

It looks to me like they depend on CORBASystemProperties.  At the  
moment we need to set all those properties to get our corba stuff  
used from the sun orb. ( plus the ssl configuration).  If you can  
make sure the orb is set up correctly in some other way, we won't  
need CORBASystemProperties or any of those dependencies.  If we still  
need CORBASystemProperties at all I'd recommend keeping all the  
dependencies just to make the start order clearer.

Alternatively we could use several modules/configurations and use  
module dependencies to assure start order.

thanks
david jencks

On Aug 24, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> I notice that a lot of the CSSBean and CorbaBean definitions in  
> plans include a dependency on SystemProperties?  I'm assuming this  
> is because these beans are using System.setProperty() to pass  
> information to the socket factories.  If I've managed to eliminate  
> that usage, can I assume it's also safe to remove the dependency?
>
> Rick