You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/09/08 12:40:28 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (DIRMINA-210) Investigate removal of static
methods in ByteBuffer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-210.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Static allocator in ByteBuffer or in IoBuffer have been around for 8 years now. Nobody complained about it, and I don't see how exposing the allocator can bring a lot of added value at this point.
For MINA 2, at least, I think it would be insane to change that. For MINA 3, this can be discussed.
> Investigate removal of static methods in ByteBuffer
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-210
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: peter royal
> Assignee: peter royal
> Fix For: 2.0.8
>
>
> The removal of the static methods in ByteBuffer should be investigated.
> Since the ByteBufferAllocator exists, that interface could be used directly. For backwards compatibility ( and simple cases ), the static methods could be retained and use a supplied instance.
> Potentially, the MINA internals could all access buffers via the allocator, leaving only user-code to use the optional static methods (after statically supplying the allocator).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)