You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/06/14 21:53:03 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29563] - escaping mechanism should be replaceable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29563>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29563

escaping mechanism should be replaceable

Joe@Germuska.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|Normal                      |Enhancement



------- Additional Comments From Joe@Germuska.com  2004-06-14 19:53 -------
Do you have a proposal for replacing the escaping mechanism?  It would help to have enough use cases 
to make a good decision.

Since TagUtils uses a singleton pattern, it ought to be possible to change the implementation of the 
static "getInstance()" method to look up an implementation class somewhere.  There's no extremely 
convenient place to put the configuration value of the implementation class, unfortunately.  Perhaps a 
System property?  Not my favorite approach, but nothing else is coming to mind.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org