You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> on 2021/10/14 21:51:50 UTC
POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Hi Devs,
there were heaps of changes since RC1 and it looks like PJ is working full-time on POI.
When should I provide the RC2?
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi Alain,
We don't seem to have any real world users hitting issues with chart cloning - it's just something that the test harness that tests lots of files does. I don't think there is any urgency on fixing the cloning issue.
Regards,
PJ
On Sunday 24 October 2021, 17:10:14 IST, Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ <ab...@for-scala.it> wrote:
Hi,
I will definitely need to reorganise my life to reserve some time for the required XDDF improvements. The code has been developed with only a few examples. This is why it is still marked with @Beta but people seem to start using it for real...
Best regards,
Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
Obter o BlueMail para Android
Em 18 de out de 2021 23:14, em 23:14, PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> escreveu:
>A large fraction of the errors
>in http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>relate to cloning sheets that contain charts - where the XDDF code
>fails to clone the chart.
>
>This is just an observation - I must admit to not knowing much about
>the XDDF code.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Monday 18 October 2021, 18:04:54 IST, Dominik Stadler
><do...@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>See the report at
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>, one of the files is
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
>(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
>
>Thanks... Dominik.
>
>On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning
><fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Dominik,
>> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing
>xsb
>> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
>> <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the
>dependency
>> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and
>documentation
>> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we
>could
>> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try
>to use
>> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add
>all of
>> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes
>made them
>> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I
>will
>> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>>
>> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and
>disk-sizes
>> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will
>propose
>> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
>> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains
>for our
>> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
>> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building
>locally
>> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
>> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at
>least
>> for me.
>>
>> Dominik.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning
><fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best
>approach
>> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues
>to the
>> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> > dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
>> > reported a lot (>90k times).
>> >
>> > One sample missing xsb is
>> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>> >
>> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it
>seems
>> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
>> automatically...
>> >
>> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>> >
>> > Dominik.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker
><ki...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2
>looks
>> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
>> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans
>5.0.2
>> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released?
>Alternatively, I
>> can
>> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
>> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>>
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ <ab...@for-scala.it>.
Hi,
I will definitely need to reorganise my life to reserve some time for the required XDDF improvements. The code has been developed with only a few examples. This is why it is still marked with @Beta but people seem to start using it for real...
Best regards,
Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
Obter o BlueMail para Android
Em 18 de out de 2021 23:14, em 23:14, PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> escreveu:
>A large fraction of the errors
>in http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>relate to cloning sheets that contain charts - where the XDDF code
>fails to clone the chart.
>
>This is just an observation - I must admit to not knowing much about
>the XDDF code.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Monday 18 October 2021, 18:04:54 IST, Dominik Stadler
><do...@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>See the report at
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>, one of the files is
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
>(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
>
>Thanks... Dominik.
>
>On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning
><fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Dominik,
>> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing
>xsb
>> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
>> <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the
>dependency
>> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and
>documentation
>> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we
>could
>> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try
>to use
>> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add
>all of
>> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes
>made them
>> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I
>will
>> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>>
>> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and
>disk-sizes
>> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will
>propose
>> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
>> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains
>for our
>> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
>> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building
>locally
>> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
>> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at
>least
>> for me.
>>
>> Dominik.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning
><fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best
>approach
>> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues
>to the
>> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> > dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
>> > reported a lot (>90k times).
>> >
>> > One sample missing xsb is
>> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>> >
>> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it
>seems
>> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
>> automatically...
>> >
>> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>> >
>> > Dominik.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker
><ki...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2
>looks
>> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
>> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans
>5.0.2
>> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released?
>Alternatively, I
>> can
>> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
>> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>>
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
A large fraction of the errors in http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html relate to cloning sheets that contain charts - where the XDDF code fails to clone the chart.
This is just an observation - I must admit to not knowing much about the XDDF code.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 18:04:54 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
Hi,
See the report at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
, one of the files is
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
Thanks... Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing xsb
> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
> <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the dependency
> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and documentation
> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we could
> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use
> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>
> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
> for me.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> > dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> > reported a lot (>90k times).
> >
> > One sample missing xsb is
> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
> >
> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
> automatically...
> >
> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I
> can
> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Looks like the poi-integration code was changed a few months so the code that walks the document and loads XmlObjects tries harder to walk the graph.
The svn commit 1888985 labelled with 'TIKA-3164 - add more .xsb and classes needed for TIKAs extractor' is the main change.
I definitely think we should consider the option of using the full schema jar, by default.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 18:04:54 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
Hi,
See the report at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
, one of the files is
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
Thanks... Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing xsb
> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
> <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the dependency
> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and documentation
> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we could
> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use
> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>
> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
> for me.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> > dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> > reported a lot (>90k times).
> >
> > One sample missing xsb is
> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
> >
> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
> automatically...
> >
> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I
> can
> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
See the report at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
, one of the files is
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
Thanks... Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing xsb
> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
> <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the dependency
> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and documentation
> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we could
> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use
> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>
> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
> for me.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> > dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> > reported a lot (>90k times).
> >
> > One sample missing xsb is
> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
> >
> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
> automatically...
> >
> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I
> can
> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi Dominik,
Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing xsb issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the dependency and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and documentation about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we could see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
Hi,
hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
for me.
Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> reported a lot (>90k times).
>
> One sample missing xsb is
> org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>
> This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> some code-change now requires this, but it is not included automatically...
>
> I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> >
> >
> > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can
> remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the dependency and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and documentation about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we could see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try to use POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
Hi,
hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
for me.
Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> reported a lot (>90k times).
>
> One sample missing xsb is
> org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>
> This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> some code-change now requires this, but it is not included automatically...
>
> I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> >
> >
> > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can
> remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi PJ,
On 24.10.21 16:58, PJ Fanning wrote:
> I added a change to poi-ooxml-lite gradle file to force the inclusion of the 107 extra XSBs.
>
> poi-ooxml-lite 5.0.0 - XSB count=1498
>
> poi-ooxml-lite latest snapshot - XSB count=1220
>
> no 5.0.0 XSBs are missing from snapshot.
>
> Is there anything else blocking an RC2? If not, I can see about creating the artifacts.
Thanks for taking care about the XSBs.
If you start rolling the release, please send a message to the dev list - it makes your life easier if no-one else commits and in cases you would need to fix the gradle scripts.
I'm not sure if this is essential, but I set the file stamps of the zip/tgz archives to the expected announcement day.
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
I added a change to poi-ooxml-lite gradle file to force the inclusion of the 107 extra XSBs.
poi-ooxml-lite 5.0.0 - XSB count=1498
poi-ooxml-lite latest snapshot - XSB count=1220
no 5.0.0 XSBs are missing from snapshot.
Is there anything else blocking an RC2? If not, I can see about creating the artifacts.
On Thursday 21 October 2021, 07:04:42 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
Hi,
The re-run with "full" is now available at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC2.html
1089 failed files compared to 5.0.0, mostly XDDF, only a few others.
Also 300 files that now fail with some "invalid ZIP", seems Apache Compress
is a bit more "picky" on some half-broken files compared to the Java Zip
classes, but there is likely not much we can do.
BTW, 1377 failed before, but now work fine, so overall we already improved
things!
Thanks... Dominik.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:59 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> Apologies for being absent... The xsb issue is why we haven't upgraded
> to 5.x on Tika yet. I _think_ we'd like to avoid the ooxml-full jar,
> but if that's the most robust option, we'll have to go with that.
>
> I'm also happy to grab new files, or run against our corpus if that'd
> be of any use.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:57 AM Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry.
> >
> > LG... Dominik.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dominik,
> > >
> > > > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the
> > > documents themselves did not change.
> > >
> > > I think you know, but to be safe, I mentioned it again.
> > > Originally only the classes where filtered, but I've added the .xsb
> > > filtering also a while ago, to minimize the lite jar further,
> > > because they are a substantial part of the jar.
> > >
> > > I could iterate through all document parts and try to see if those
> parts
> > > are parsed and check the structure recursive.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, I've optimized the xmlbeans schema generation, so
> the
> > > schema shrunk from 19mb to 13mb.
> > > There would be the option to split the schema jar to the sub schemas
> > > including the necessary dependencies to the base/abstract schemas -
> but I
> > > guess this will be even more confusing for the user base.
> > >
> > > Regarding the 107 documents, it's fairly easy to add the documents
> locally
> > > and see which deltas, i.e. not yet loaded .xsbs, are added from file to
> > > file, to identify the files which needed to be added to the integration
> > > directory.
> > >
> > > Andi.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
The re-run with "full" is now available at
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC2.html
1089 failed files compared to 5.0.0, mostly XDDF, only a few others.
Also 300 files that now fail with some "invalid ZIP", seems Apache Compress
is a bit more "picky" on some half-broken files compared to the Java Zip
classes, but there is likely not much we can do.
BTW, 1377 failed before, but now work fine, so overall we already improved
things!
Thanks... Dominik.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:59 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> Apologies for being absent... The xsb issue is why we haven't upgraded
> to 5.x on Tika yet. I _think_ we'd like to avoid the ooxml-full jar,
> but if that's the most robust option, we'll have to go with that.
>
> I'm also happy to grab new files, or run against our corpus if that'd
> be of any use.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:57 AM Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry.
> >
> > LG... Dominik.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dominik,
> > >
> > > > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the
> > > documents themselves did not change.
> > >
> > > I think you know, but to be safe, I mentioned it again.
> > > Originally only the classes where filtered, but I've added the .xsb
> > > filtering also a while ago, to minimize the lite jar further,
> > > because they are a substantial part of the jar.
> > >
> > > I could iterate through all document parts and try to see if those
> parts
> > > are parsed and check the structure recursive.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, I've optimized the xmlbeans schema generation, so
> the
> > > schema shrunk from 19mb to 13mb.
> > > There would be the option to split the schema jar to the sub schemas
> > > including the necessary dependencies to the base/abstract schemas -
> but I
> > > guess this will be even more confusing for the user base.
> > >
> > > Regarding the 107 documents, it's fairly easy to add the documents
> locally
> > > and see which deltas, i.e. not yet loaded .xsbs, are added from file to
> > > file, to identify the files which needed to be added to the integration
> > > directory.
> > >
> > > Andi.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Apologies for being absent... The xsb issue is why we haven't upgraded
to 5.x on Tika yet. I _think_ we'd like to avoid the ooxml-full jar,
but if that's the most robust option, we'll have to go with that.
I'm also happy to grab new files, or run against our corpus if that'd
be of any use.
Many thanks!
Best,
Tim
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:57 AM Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry.
>
> LG... Dominik.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dominik,
> >
> > > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the
> > documents themselves did not change.
> >
> > I think you know, but to be safe, I mentioned it again.
> > Originally only the classes where filtered, but I've added the .xsb
> > filtering also a while ago, to minimize the lite jar further,
> > because they are a substantial part of the jar.
> >
> > I could iterate through all document parts and try to see if those parts
> > are parsed and check the structure recursive.
> >
> > On the other hand, I've optimized the xmlbeans schema generation, so the
> > schema shrunk from 19mb to 13mb.
> > There would be the option to split the schema jar to the sub schemas
> > including the necessary dependencies to the base/abstract schemas - but I
> > guess this will be even more confusing for the user base.
> >
> > Regarding the 107 documents, it's fairly easy to add the documents locally
> > and see which deltas, i.e. not yet loaded .xsbs, are added from file to
> > file, to identify the files which needed to be added to the integration
> > directory.
> >
> > Andi.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry.
LG... Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the
> documents themselves did not change.
>
> I think you know, but to be safe, I mentioned it again.
> Originally only the classes where filtered, but I've added the .xsb
> filtering also a while ago, to minimize the lite jar further,
> because they are a substantial part of the jar.
>
> I could iterate through all document parts and try to see if those parts
> are parsed and check the structure recursive.
>
> On the other hand, I've optimized the xmlbeans schema generation, so the
> schema shrunk from 19mb to 13mb.
> There would be the option to split the schema jar to the sub schemas
> including the necessary dependencies to the base/abstract schemas - but I
> guess this will be even more confusing for the user base.
>
> Regarding the 107 documents, it's fairly easy to add the documents locally
> and see which deltas, i.e. not yet loaded .xsbs, are added from file to
> file, to identify the files which needed to be added to the integration
> directory.
>
> Andi.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi Dominik,
> Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the documents themselves did not change.
I think you know, but to be safe, I mentioned it again.
Originally only the classes where filtered, but I've added the .xsb filtering also a while ago, to minimize the lite jar further,
because they are a substantial part of the jar.
I could iterate through all document parts and try to see if those parts are parsed and check the structure recursive.
On the other hand, I've optimized the xmlbeans schema generation, so the schema shrunk from 19mb to 13mb.
There would be the option to split the schema jar to the sub schemas including the necessary dependencies to the base/abstract schemas - but I guess this will be even more confusing for the user base.
Regarding the 107 documents, it's fairly easy to add the documents locally and see which deltas, i.e. not yet loaded .xsbs, are added from file to file, to identify the files which needed to be added to the integration directory.
Andi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add all of
them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes made them
required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I will
trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and disk-sizes
and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will propose
removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains for our
uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building locally
takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at least
for me.
Dominik.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach
> is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the
> poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
> dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
> reported a lot (>90k times).
>
> One sample missing xsb is
> org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>
> This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems
> some code-change now requires this, but it is not included automatically...
>
> I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>
> Dominik.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
> >
> >
> > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can
> remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best approach is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues to the poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at> wrote:
FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still reported a lot (>90k times).
One sample missing xsb is org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems some code-change now requires this, but it is not included automatically...
I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
Dominik.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
>
>
> On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
>> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2 release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still reported
a lot (>90k times).
One sample missing xsb is
org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it seems some
code-change now requires this, but it is not included automatically...
I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
Dominik.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks
> good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
>
>
> On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> > With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2
> release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can
> remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
"Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2 looks good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2 release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?
Posted by PJ Fanning <fa...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans 5.0.2 release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released? Alternatively, I can remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
On Thursday 14 October 2021, 22:52:10 IST, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Devs,
there were heaps of changes since RC1 and it looks like PJ is working full-time on POI.
When should I provide the RC2?
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org