You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-users@xerces.apache.org by michael sorens <ms...@softhome.net> on 2004/07/19 20:33:10 UTC
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a
patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future version?
What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by michael sorens <ms...@softhome.net>.
OK--I stored a local copy of xhtml-strict.xsd, made the update, modified
my files to refer to the local copy, and then xerces proceeds without
complaint. That's what I needed--thanks.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:37:39 -0400, Michael Glavassevich
<mr...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm not aware of any patch. With Xerces 2.6.2, you'd have to modify the
> schema file. Try replacing instances of [-+] in patterns with [+\-]. We
> do
> track schema errata, so if this portion of E2-18 is indeed rescinded it
> will undoubtedly be addressed in some future release, allowing validation
> with the original xhtml-strict schema again.
>
> Thanks.
>
> "michael sorens" <ms...@softhome.net> wrote on 07/20/2004 04:04:23 PM:
>
>> I still need some clarification/assistance, please. I'm a *casual* user
> of
>> xerces. I'm trying to do a simple validation of a bunch of files with
>> xhtml-strict.xsd, and xerces 2.6.2 spews a couple errors on the regexps
>> for each file. Is there a patch to the xhtml-strict.xsd file? Or is
> there
>> a patch to the xerces 2.6.2 release? What is the simplest approach to
>> getting around this issue?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:36:20 -0700, Bob Foster <bo...@objfac.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, it's time to unimplement it. I've been informed by Steve
>> > Sperberg-McQueen that a portion of that errata resolution has been
>> > rewritten so as to allow the usage in xhtml1-strict (and many other
>> > published schemas).
>> >
>> > Bob Foster
>> >
>> > Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello Michael,
>> >>
>> >> This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular
>> >> version of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+]
> in
>> >> the value of a pattern facet.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
>
>> >>> 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is
> a
>> >>> patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future
>> >>> version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
>> >>>
>> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------
>> >> Michael Glavassevich
>> >> XML Parser Development
>> >> IBM Toronto Lab
>> >> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> >> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>>
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Michael,
I'm not aware of any patch. With Xerces 2.6.2, you'd have to modify the
schema file. Try replacing instances of [-+] in patterns with [+\-]. We do
track schema errata, so if this portion of E2-18 is indeed rescinded it
will undoubtedly be addressed in some future release, allowing validation
with the original xhtml-strict schema again.
Thanks.
"michael sorens" <ms...@softhome.net> wrote on 07/20/2004 04:04:23 PM:
> I still need some clarification/assistance, please. I'm a *casual* user
of
> xerces. I'm trying to do a simple validation of a bunch of files with
> xhtml-strict.xsd, and xerces 2.6.2 spews a couple errors on the regexps
> for each file. Is there a patch to the xhtml-strict.xsd file? Or is
there
> a patch to the xerces 2.6.2 release? What is the simplest approach to
> getting around this issue?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:36:20 -0700, Bob Foster <bo...@objfac.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, it's time to unimplement it. I've been informed by Steve
> > Sperberg-McQueen that a portion of that errata resolution has been
> > rewritten so as to allow the usage in xhtml1-strict (and many other
> > published schemas).
> >
> > Bob Foster
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Michael,
> >>
> >> This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular
> >> version of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+]
in
> >> the value of a pattern facet.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18
> >>
> >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
> >>> 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is
a
> >>> patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future
> >>> version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
> >>>
> >>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------
> >> Michael Glavassevich
> >> XML Parser Development
> >> IBM Toronto Lab
> >> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> >> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by michael sorens <ms...@softhome.net>.
I still need some clarification/assistance, please. I'm a *casual* user of
xerces. I'm trying to do a simple validation of a bunch of files with
xhtml-strict.xsd, and xerces 2.6.2 spews a couple errors on the regexps
for each file. Is there a patch to the xhtml-strict.xsd file? Or is there
a patch to the xerces 2.6.2 release? What is the simplest approach to
getting around this issue?
Thanks.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:36:20 -0700, Bob Foster <bo...@objfac.com> wrote:
> Well, it's time to unimplement it. I've been informed by Steve
> Sperberg-McQueen that a portion of that errata resolution has been
> rewritten so as to allow the usage in xhtml1-strict (and many other
> published schemas).
>
> Bob Foster
>
> Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular
>> version of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+] in
>> the value of a pattern facet.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
>>> 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a
>>> patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future
>>> version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------
>> Michael Glavassevich
>> XML Parser Development
>> IBM Toronto Lab
>> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
>> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by Bob Foster <bo...@objfac.com>.
Well, it's time to unimplement it. I've been informed by Steve
Sperberg-McQueen that a portion of that errata resolution has been
rewritten so as to allow the usage in xhtml1-strict (and many other
published schemas).
Bob Foster
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular
> version of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+] in
> the value of a pattern facet.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:
>
>>
>> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
>> 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a
>> patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future
>> version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
> E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@apache.org>.
Hello Michael,
This erratum [1] has been implemented in Xerces. That particular version
of the xhtml1-strict schema is in error if it contains [-+] in the value
of a pattern facet.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-18
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, michael sorens wrote:
>
> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces 2.6.2. I
> reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a patch available
> for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future version? What does a casual
> user do today to get around this bug?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Xerces validation and symbol table features
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Nikhil Dinesh <ni...@seas.upenn.edu> wrote on 07/19/2004 04:22:01 PM:
> b. The second issue is with regard to symbol tables. I noticed that in
> addition to the symbol table there is a feature
> "http://xml.org/sax/features/string-interning" which is true by default.
In Xerces, this feature is effectively read-only. You cannot set it to
false. The symbol table does string interning.
> Are names being put in both the symbol table and the interned table?
> There may some speed issues with this.
Only when a new identifier is added to the symbol table. The next time the
symbol table sees that sequence of characters it will return the interned
instance of the string instead of creating a new string.
> Is there a way to get Xerces to put the values of attributes in
> the symbol table? The way I do it now is by intercepting SAX events, but
> iterating over all the attributes is quite expensive.
There is no such feature.
> Im using the Xerces CVS build checked out early last week.
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
Xerces validation and symbol table features
Posted by Nikhil Dinesh <ni...@seas.upenn.edu>.
Hi,
Im using Xerces to construct a large schema instance in memory and I was
wondering if there is any way to do the following:
a. For getElementById to work I need to call psviDoc.normalizeDocument(),
right? The problem here is that the schemas are complex and validation is
expensive. Is there is any way to make getElementById work without full
validation ? I tried setting the
"http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema/augment-psvi" to be
false. But that causes a NullPointerException on calling
normalizeDocument().
b. The second issue is with regard to symbol tables. I noticed that in
addition to the symbol table there is a feature
"http://xml.org/sax/features/string-interning" which is true by default.
Are names being put in both the symbol table and the interned table?
There may some speed issues with this.
Is there a way to get Xerces to put the values of attributes in
the symbol table? The way I do it now is by intercepting SAX events, but
iterating over all the attributes is quite expensive.
Im using the Xerces CVS build checked out early last week.
Thanks,
Nikhil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Bug parsing xhtml-strict schema
Posted by Bob Foster <bo...@objfac.com>.
People may be interested to know that the spec is about to change _back_
so that 1.0 schemas that were correct and became incorrect because of
the pattern errata become correct again. ;-}
Kudos to the schema committee for this. Now, when can we expect to see
Xerces conform?
Bob Foster
michael sorens wrote:
>
> I ran into precisely the same problem with xhtml1-strict with Xerces
> 2.6.2. I reviewed the errata you indicated--does that mean there is a
> patch available for Xerces 2.6.2, or that it will be in a future
> version? What does a casual user do today to get around this bug?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org