You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Marshall Schor (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2011/07/25 17:48:09 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-2182) Addons OSGi - bundles not picking up
the License/Notice files for the whole bundle
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070563#comment-13070563 ]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-2182:
--------------------------------------
Also, update the http://uima.apache.org/maven-design.html page to account for the OSGi packaging, with respect to the LICENSE / NOTICE files.
> Addons OSGi - bundles not picking up the License/Notice files for the whole bundle
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-2182
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2182
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: addons-osgi
> Reporter: Marshall Schor
> Assignee: Marshall Schor
>
> An example: The BSF Annotator, when packaged *not* as an OSGi bundle, is packaged as both a single Jar, with only the BSF Annotator code itself, and also as a PEAR file, containing that Jar plus the dependent Jars it needs to run. The PEAR file has a License/Notice that includes the information needed because of distributing the dependent Jars it needs. The basic Jar file, containing only the Apache-produced code, has the LICENSE/NOTICE files without this other information - this seems correct to me.
> The OSGi packaging is distributing the other Jars, so it needs the augmented version of the LICENSE/NOTICE files. If any OSGi packagings have additional Jars, beyond what is included in the non-OSGi packaging, the License/Notice files for those need to be potentially augmeneted, also.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira