You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/02 14:57:46 UTC

svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

Hi,

it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my
working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for
docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml.

What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expected?

Regards,
Yann.

Re: svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.

On 12/02/2014 09:56 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my
>> working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for
>> docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml.
>>
>> What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expected?
>>
>
> I am probably guilty of not doing merges correctly, causing mergeinfo
> to be omitted. I think Greg had guided us to always merge into a clean
> tree and commit "."
>
> But there did seem to be a huge influx of mergeinfo from rbowens
> r1622292 including the one giving you a problem.  I can't imagine that
> specific instance of the data is serving any purpose
>


Sorry about that. Not sure what I did there. :(

-- 
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my
> working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for
> docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml.
>
> What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expected?
>

I am probably guilty of not doing merges correctly, causing mergeinfo
to be omitted. I think Greg had guided us to always merge into a clean
tree and commit "."

But there did seem to be a huge influx of mergeinfo from rbowens
r1622292 including the one giving you a problem.  I can't imagine that
specific instance of the data is serving any purpose