You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jetspeed-user@portals.apache.org by Ron Wheeler <rw...@artifact-software.com> on 2014/01/17 06:38:29 UTC

Jetspeed Roadmap poll

I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to 
confirm the acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 and 
let David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that 
you want considered.

If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap 
discussion at 
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-3347198.S.5828949445881905155 
describing your concerns.

Show some love!

Ron

-- 
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org


Re: Jetspeed Roadmap poll

Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/17/2014 12:40 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 06:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>> I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to confirm the
>> acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
>> Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 and let
>> David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that you want
>> considered.
>>
>> If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap
>> discussion at
>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-3347198.S.5828949445881905155
>>
>> describing your concerns.
>
> <ASF member hat on>
> While I think it is great to see the roadmap being discussed, I *strongly*
> disagree with this happening outside the Jetspeed mailing list(s).
>
> I don't think there is anything wrong with the LinkedIn group, but it shouldn't
> replace the community participation here.
>
> An important 'rule' at Apache is:
>    "if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen at all"
>
> So, anything which is discussed (and maybe even decided) externally (LinkedIn,
> Skype, f2f, whatever) which would be of importance to this community should be
> (also) reported/mirrored on the list.
>
> Also note that the ASF mailing lists are archived (for ever) so even future
> community members can review and find back old arguments, discussions, choices
> made. Using external 'sources' like LinkedIn groups or whatever, cuts out both
> current *and* future community members.
> </ASF member hat off>
>
> Ron, please don't take my remarks above as critique on *what* you are trying to
> do. I really think it is great you're trying to renew the community.
> My remark only concerns the *how*.

Another thing with the LinkedIn group I just experienced is that, while it is an 
'open group', it requires to have a LinkedIn account and be signed in to even 
access the content, and (thus) neither is any of that content indexed by public 
search engines.

The Apache (community) lists are publicly indexed and searchable as well as 
anonymously browsable through the ASF mail archives (or mirrors thereof).
And you even can post anonymously to these lists, only then going through 
moderation to prevent the lists from being spammed.

>
> Kind regards, Ate
>
>>
>> Show some love!
>>
>> Ron
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org


Re: Jetspeed Roadmap poll

Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
Hi Ron,

On 01/17/2014 02:56 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Mailing lists are good for problem resolution but are difficult to use for
> discussions that take place over time.

I have to disagree with you on this. It really depends on what you trying to 
achieve.
Of course discussions on like LinkedIn can go much faster (and probably easier 
as well), but the problem is that it doesn't work well (and actually not at all 
for LinkedIn) to serve the whole of the community, and certainly not over time.

Using LinkedIn cuts off the community members who are not a LinkedIn member 
(now) and certainly future community members who come looking for information 
either through the mailing list archives or public search indexes.

So, while using LinkedIn might be more 'convenient' to some right now (and to be 
clear: I'm not disagreeing on that), it doesn't align with the general Apache 
policies concerning how to interact with and serve the community.

Having discussions on a mailing list might seem difficult to you.
But really: this is the common way ALL Apache project communities communicate.
And how they are *supposed* to communicate: through the mailing list.
This is not something optional, its one of the core ASF principles!

Of course you can organize project discussions outside of the mailing list with 
selected people if you so desire. But you're stepping out of the project 
community when doing so.
That might not even be a serious issue, depending on the topic and information 
shared back.
But if it concerns something (like in this case) the project *roadmap*, and you 
explicitly ask people to go 'offline' and discuss this on LinkedIn *instead* of 
discussing this on the mailing list, I really think this is a bad sign.

Note: there isn't necessarily something wrong with temporary 'offline' 
discussions as long those discussions are properly recorded and reported back on 
the list.
This is what some other ASF projects do as well, like using Hangout or f2f 
meetings, but they always (should) report back to the list, often with a full 
transcript of what was said/discussed/concluded.

Still, a major topic like discussing the roadmap doesn't seem fit to me for such 
an 'offline' discussion.

> The polling methods in lists are really unsatisfactory.
Well, AFAIK the poll you created for the proposed roadmap really isn't much more 
than a typical 'VOTE' thread as we are common to have at ASF mailing lists.

And actually, I'd prefer doing this through a mailing list VOTE thread as I can 
add concrete feedback on my vote 'inline' with my answer.
I can't do such thing with the LinkedIn poll.

>
> Jetspeed is a project that has had a great deal of difficulty in building a
> community and I hope that this helps find all of the people that have an
> interest in Jetspeed and get a bit of community involvement.
> LinkedIn is a pretty popular and free spot for business-oriented people to meet.

Like I said before, I think its fine (and even great) to have the LinkedIn 
Jetspeed group. No problem there.
My problem is when it starts getting used to pull the community *away* from Apache.

>
> I think that you will find that many Apache projects have an active LinkedIn
> group (Maven, Cloudstack, Wicket, JMeter. Mahoot, etc.)
>
Sure. And they might have or should have similar concerns.
Or maybe/likely they don't have them.
The active Jetspeed community is *so* small, that you easily can 'break' it 
further by pulling people over to LinkedIn only.
I don't think the above mentioned projects are in the same boat, or at least 
also have enough vibrant Apache community mailing list activity to prevent such 
problems.

> I share your concern for the "Official Record" status of the developer list but
> I am not sure if this matters a lot on the user list side.
I would agree if the user list and developer list would be largely separate groups.
But right now I think there hardly is much difference anymore between them 
because the whole of the community is so small and AFAIK everyone (active) on 
the user list is also subscribed to the developer list and visa versa.
IMO in the current situation it might actually be better to merge these lists 
and only have a developer list...

>
> I hope that the LinkedIn list will encourage discussions about how Jetspeed is
> being used and what is needed to make it more competitive with alternatives.
Sure, and I'm fine with that!
But don't you agree this type of information should (also) flow back to the user 
list? Its not like everyone on the Jetspeed user list is member of the Jetspeed 
LinkedIn group (by far).
But note that even when the outcome of such discussions at LinkedIn would be 
reported back to this list, the discussion already is 'done and over'.
So other community members who are not part of the LinkedIn discussion are 
confronted with only the end result, might feel it being too late to chime in 
after the fact.

> This is hard to do in a mailing list since the individual transactions are
> transient and it is hard to follow a discussion that takes place over many days
> or weeks.
That might be, if the mailing list was very much active, with many concurrent 
running discussions. But that isn't really the case, is it?

> On LinkedIn each discussion thread is available while you are adding your
> comment so people can join in late and quickly read the previous comments,
> You can also "like" comments that others have posted and that becomes part of
> the permanent record.
Well, permanent at LinkedIn only, and only available to those signed in.

> It is also easy to check out the person making the comment which can be helpful
> in understanding their contribution or point of view.
Helpful for sure. But should it be a requirement?

>
> I hope that the project committers will become more active in promoting the
> project and actively work at communicating with the community through
> discussions and polls on LinkedIn.
Well, I'm not really active in the project for quite a while so I shouldn't be 
regarded as an example, but if and when I'm participating, I will only do so 
here on the mailing list.
And to be clear: that is independent from this specific project or my currently 
inactive role.
I'm active in other ASF projects and I'll stick to participating only on their 
respective mailing lists because that is how the ASF works and works well that way.

> I hope that the use community will become more active by discussing success
> stories, use cases and sharing ideas for shared portlets.

I hope so too, and please do this (also) here on the community mailing lists.

Regards, Ate

>
> Ron
> //
>
> On 17/01/2014 6:40 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>> On 01/17/2014 06:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>>> I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to confirm the
>>> acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
>>> Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 and let
>>> David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that you want
>>> considered.
>>>
>>> If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap
>>> discussion at
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-3347198.S.5828949445881905155
>>>
>>> describing your concerns.
>>
>> <ASF member hat on>
>> While I think it is great to see the roadmap being discussed, I *strongly*
>> disagree with this happening outside the Jetspeed mailing list(s).
>>
>> I don't think there is anything wrong with the LinkedIn group, but it
>> shouldn't replace the community participation here.
>>
>> An important 'rule' at Apache is:
>>   "if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen at all"
>>
>> So, anything which is discussed (and maybe even decided) externally (LinkedIn,
>> Skype, f2f, whatever) which would be of importance to this community should be
>> (also) reported/mirrored on the list.
>>
>> Also note that the ASF mailing lists are archived (for ever) so even future
>> community members can review and find back old arguments, discussions, choices
>> made. Using external 'sources' like LinkedIn groups or whatever, cuts out both
>> current *and* future community members.
>> </ASF member hat off>
>>
>> Ron, please don't take my remarks above as critique on *what* you are trying
>> to do. I really think it is great you're trying to renew the community.
>> My remark only concerns the *how*.
>>
>> Kind regards, Ate
>>
>>>
>>> Show some love!
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org


Re: Jetspeed Roadmap poll

Posted by Ron Wheeler <rw...@artifact-software.com>.
Mailing lists are good for problem resolution but are difficult to use 
for discussions that take place over time.
The polling methods in lists are really unsatisfactory.

Jetspeed is a project that has had a great deal of difficulty in 
building a community and I hope that this helps find all of the people 
that have an interest in Jetspeed and get a bit of community involvement.
LinkedIn is a pretty popular and free spot for business-oriented people 
to meet.

I think that you will find that many Apache projects have an active 
LinkedIn group (Maven, Cloudstack, Wicket, JMeter. Mahoot, etc.)

I share your concern for the "Official Record" status of the developer 
list but I am not sure if this matters a lot on the user list side.

I hope that the LinkedIn list will encourage discussions about how 
Jetspeed is being used and what is needed to make it more competitive 
with alternatives.
This is hard to do in a mailing list since the individual transactions 
are transient and it is hard to follow a discussion that takes place 
over many days or weeks.
On LinkedIn each discussion thread is available while you are adding 
your comment so people can join in late and quickly read the previous 
comments,
You can also "like" comments that others have posted and that becomes 
part of the permanent record.
It is also easy to check out the person making the comment which can be 
helpful in understanding their contribution or point of view.

I hope that the project committers will become more active in promoting 
the project and actively work at communicating with the community 
through discussions and polls on LinkedIn.
I hope that the use community will become more active by discussing 
success stories, use cases and sharing ideas for shared portlets.

Ron
//

On 17/01/2014 6:40 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 06:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>> I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to 
>> confirm the
>> acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
>> Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 
>> and let
>> David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that 
>> you want
>> considered.
>>
>> If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap
>> discussion at
>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-3347198.S.5828949445881905155 
>>
>> describing your concerns.
>
> <ASF member hat on>
> While I think it is great to see the roadmap being discussed, I 
> *strongly* disagree with this happening outside the Jetspeed mailing 
> list(s).
>
> I don't think there is anything wrong with the LinkedIn group, but it 
> shouldn't replace the community participation here.
>
> An important 'rule' at Apache is:
>   "if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen at all"
>
> So, anything which is discussed (and maybe even decided) externally 
> (LinkedIn, Skype, f2f, whatever) which would be of importance to this 
> community should be (also) reported/mirrored on the list.
>
> Also note that the ASF mailing lists are archived (for ever) so even 
> future community members can review and find back old arguments, 
> discussions, choices made. Using external 'sources' like LinkedIn 
> groups or whatever, cuts out both current *and* future community members.
> </ASF member hat off>
>
> Ron, please don't take my remarks above as critique on *what* you are 
> trying to do. I really think it is great you're trying to renew the 
> community.
> My remark only concerns the *how*.
>
> Kind regards, Ate
>
>>
>> Show some love!
>>
>> Ron
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102


Re: Jetspeed Roadmap poll

Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/17/2014 06:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to confirm the
> acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
> Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 and let
> David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that you want
> considered.
>
> If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap
> discussion at
> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-3347198.S.5828949445881905155
> describing your concerns.

<ASF member hat on>
While I think it is great to see the roadmap being discussed, I *strongly* 
disagree with this happening outside the Jetspeed mailing list(s).

I don't think there is anything wrong with the LinkedIn group, but it shouldn't 
replace the community participation here.

An important 'rule' at Apache is:
   "if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen at all"

So, anything which is discussed (and maybe even decided) externally (LinkedIn, 
Skype, f2f, whatever) which would be of importance to this community should be 
(also) reported/mirrored on the list.

Also note that the ASF mailing lists are archived (for ever) so even future 
community members can review and find back old arguments, discussions, choices 
made. Using external 'sources' like LinkedIn groups or whatever, cuts out both 
current *and* future community members.
</ASF member hat off>

Ron, please don't take my remarks above as critique on *what* you are trying to 
do. I really think it is great you're trying to renew the community.
My remark only concerns the *how*.

Kind regards, Ate

>
> Show some love!
>
> Ron
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org


Re: Jetspeed Roadmap poll

Posted by David S Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>.
Hi Ron,

I voted on the poll at the LinkedIn Group. Thanks for putting this
together. I really like having several outlets for the community to come
together. Recommend that others check it out


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwheeler@artifact-software.com
> wrote:

> I have created a poll in the Jetspeed Portal group on LinkedIn to confirm
> the acceptability of the Jetspeed Roadmap.
> Please visit http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Portal-3347198 and
> let David know whether you support the roadmap or have some topics that you
> want considered.
>
> If you do not vote for the Roadmap, please add a comment to the Roadmap
> discussion at http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Jetspeed-Road-Map-2014-
> 3347198.S.5828949445881905155 describing your concerns.
>
> Show some love!
>
> Ron
>
> --
> Ron Wheeler
> President
> Artifact Software Inc
> email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com
> skype: ronaldmwheeler
> phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-help@portals.apache.org
>
>