You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> on 2006/12/04 21:51:48 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
Binaries and Source Distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
Maven Repository:
http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
Release notes: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
(NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
the directory name...)
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
candidates and this one!
- The CXF team
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me
On 12/6/06, Peter Jones <pe...@iona.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
>
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> > Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> > candidates and this one!
> >
> > - The CXF team
>
> --
> Peter Jones
> IONA Technologies Inc.
> E-Mail: mailto:peter.jones@iona.com
> Tel: (w) 709-738-3725 x22 | Fax: 709-738-3745
> 84-86 Elizabeth Ave. St. John's, NL A1A 1W7 Canada
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Peter Jones <pe...@iona.com>.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> [...]
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
+1
Cheers,
Peter
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
--
Peter Jones
IONA Technologies Inc.
E-Mail: mailto:peter.jones@iona.com
Tel: (w) 709-738-3725 x22 | Fax: 709-738-3745
84-86 Elizabeth Ave. St. John's, NL A1A 1W7 Canada
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
--
Freeman Fang
Software Engineer
IONA Asia Pacific Software Development Center
No.2 Floor A Unit Information Center
Zhongguancun Software Park Haidian District,
Beijing, P.R.China
Tel.: +86-10-82825151 - ex. 551
Fax: +86-10-8282-5210
freeman.fang@iona.com
-------------------------------------------------
Making Software Work Together TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
--
Freeman Fang
Software Engineer
IONA Asia Pacific Software Development Center
No.2 Floor A Unit Information Center
Zhongguancun Software Park Haidian District,
Beijing, P.R.China
Tel.: +86-10-82825151 - ex. 551
Fax: +86-10-8282-5210
freeman.fang@iona.com
-------------------------------------------------
Making Software Work Together TM
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
The latest release build is again uploaded here [1], let's re-roll
again. Hopefully,we can go out and get some beer after this re-roll. :-)
Cheers,
Bo
[1] http://people.apache.org/~blin/
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> After chatting with Jim and taking Dims' comments into account, it looks like
> we need to build another release candidate with an updated release_notes.txt
> file. The current file has:
> * JAX-WS 2.0 implementation
> which we cannot claim until we pass the tck. Jim is going to look through
> the file more carefully and see if anything else pops up.
>
> Once we get all the straitened out, we need a new build to vote on. I
> suggest the ONLY change should be the release_notes.txt file and any other
> files related to the JAX-WS/tck issue. That makes the vote much simpler.
>
> Let hope this can be the last one......
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Monday 04 December 2006 15:51, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
>> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
>> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
>> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>>
>> Binaries and Source Distributions:
>> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apach
>> e.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/> Maven Repository:
>> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
>> e/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/
>> apache/cxf> Release notes:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating
>> +Release+Notes
>>
>>
>> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
>> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
>> the directory name...)
>>
>> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
>> candidates and this one!
>>
>> - The CXF team
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
After chatting with Jim and taking Dims' comments into account, it looks like
we need to build another release candidate with an updated release_notes.txt
file. The current file has:
* JAX-WS 2.0 implementation
which we cannot claim until we pass the tck. Jim is going to look through
the file more carefully and see if anything else pops up.
Once we get all the straitened out, we need a new build to vote on. I
suggest the ONLY change should be the release_notes.txt file and any other
files related to the JAX-WS/tck issue. That makes the vote much simpler.
Let hope this can be the last one......
Dan
On Monday 04 December 2006 15:51, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apach
>e.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
>e/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/
>apache/cxf> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating
>+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Andrea Smyth <an...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Andrea Smyth <an...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
+1
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
+1
On Monday 04 December 2006 15:51, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apach
>e.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
>e/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/
>apache/cxf> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating
>+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
Oh, forgot to say:
Very big thanks for taking the time to look at the release and commenting on
it. Those of you that are taking the time to look at stuff on projects you
aren't a mentor on deserve a medal or something.
VERY big thanks.
Dan
On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:48, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> > > While this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started
> > > counting in the directory name...)
> > >
> > > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > +0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
> >
> > - questions -
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apa
> >ch e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar is
> > missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> > distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> > then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
>
> This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven produces
> doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix pending to
> the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the maven team
> while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note that NONE of
> the javadoc jars in /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
> have those.
>
> I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how
> did the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is
> this another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing?
>
> > - notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
> >
> > MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> > place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> > Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> > Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> > AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
>
> Noted. Jira CXF-298.
>
> > once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> > apache
>
> I'm curious about this. If you look at the org/apache section of the
> maven2 repository (the public one where all the top level releases go),
> NOTHING is prefixed with apache. The only one that is close is apacheds.
> How can it be a requirement of a TLP if only a single TLP does it? Isn't
> having them in "org/apache" sufficient?
>
> > the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> > non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> > (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> > there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> > before this policy is adopted.
> >
> > perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started
> > section
>
> Noted as JIRA issue CXF-299 to fix for m2. That said, a link is right on
> our home page which IS in the README.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
Oh, forgot to say:
Very big thanks for taking the time to look at the release and commenting on
it. Those of you that are taking the time to look at stuff on projects you
aren't a mentor on deserve a medal or something.
VERY big thanks.
Dan
On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:48, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> > > While this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started
> > > counting in the directory name...)
> > >
> > > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > +0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
> >
> > - questions -
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apa
> >ch e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar is
> > missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> > distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> > then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
>
> This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven produces
> doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix pending to
> the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the maven team
> while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note that NONE of
> the javadoc jars in /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
> have those.
>
> I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how
> did the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is
> this another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing?
>
> > - notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
> >
> > MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> > place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> > Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> > Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> > AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
>
> Noted. Jira CXF-298.
>
> > once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> > apache
>
> I'm curious about this. If you look at the org/apache section of the
> maven2 repository (the public one where all the top level releases go),
> NOTHING is prefixed with apache. The only one that is close is apacheds.
> How can it be a requirement of a TLP if only a single TLP does it? Isn't
> having them in "org/apache" sufficient?
>
> > the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> > non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> > (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> > there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> > before this policy is adopted.
> >
> > perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started
> > section
>
> Noted as JIRA issue CXF-299 to fix for m2. That said, a link is right on
> our home page which IS in the README.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:59, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/a
> > >pach e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar
> > > is missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> > > distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> > > then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
> >
> > This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven
> > produces doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix
> > pending to the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the
> > maven team while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note
> > that NONE of the javadoc jars in
> > /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository have those.
>
> i don't check the jars in there, just in here :-)
Well. All of the stuff in there SHOULD have appeared here first. That is
THE distribution site for incubating maven artifacts. Thus, the incubating
projects should have voted on them here first. Thus, you should have seen
them. (providing one of them popped into your "random selection of jars".
Guess one didn't. We're the (un)lucky ones.)
Again, thanks for taking the time.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
Doh! didn't check reply to before sending
(sorry for the duplicate post daniel)
On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> > > While this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started
> > > counting in the directory name...)
> > >
> > > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > +0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
> >
> > - questions -
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
> >e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar is
> > missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> > distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> > then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
>
> This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven produces
> doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix pending to
> the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the maven team
> while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note that NONE of the
> javadoc jars in /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository have
> those.
i don't check the jars in there, just in here :-)
AIUI there are historic quality issues with the maven repository. FWIW
i hope that one day we'll move to automatic verification using a
commit hook in subversion but there code that needs to be written
before that can happen
> I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how did
> the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is this
> another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing?
it's long standing policy: all distributed artifacts must contain
LICENSE and NOTICE files (plus disclaimer for podlings).
RAT doesn't do jars and spidering yet so these need to be checked
manually. so mistakes happen. i generally only manually check a
sample. (believe it or not, i do have better things to do on a rainy
thursday than check every jar in a servicemix release)
> > once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> > apache
>
> I'm curious about this. If you look at the org/apache section of the maven2
> repository (the public one where all the top level releases go), NOTHING is
> prefixed with apache. The only one that is close is apacheds. How can it
> be a requirement of a TLP if only a single TLP does it? Isn't having them
> in "org/apache" sufficient?
it's the actual artifacts themselves: they should contain the full
project name (for example apache-ant). AIUI this gives the project
some trademark leverage over bogus jars.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> > While this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started
> > counting in the directory name...)
> >
> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> +0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
>
> - questions -
>
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
>e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar is
> missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven produces
doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix pending to
the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the maven team
while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note that NONE of the
javadoc jars in /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository have
those.
I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how did
the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is this
another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing?
> - notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
>
> MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
Noted. Jira CXF-298.
> once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> apache
I'm curious about this. If you look at the org/apache section of the maven2
repository (the public one where all the top level releases go), NOTHING is
prefixed with apache. The only one that is close is apacheds. How can it
be a requirement of a TLP if only a single TLP does it? Isn't having them
in "org/apache" sufficient?
> the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> before this policy is adopted.
>
> perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started section
Noted as JIRA issue CXF-299 to fix for m2. That said, a link is right on
our home page which IS in the README.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
On Thursday 07 December 2006 17:12, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> > While this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started
> > counting in the directory name...)
> >
> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> +0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
>
> - questions -
>
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apach
>e/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar is
> missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore be
> distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if yes
> then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
This is a bug/restriction in Maven. The javadoc jars that Maven produces
doesn't have a way to put those files in them. There is a fix pending to
the javadoc plugin to fix that, but that's been held up by the maven team
while they figure out a lot of other release issues. Note that NONE of the
javadoc jars in /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository have
those.
I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how did
the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is this
another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing?
> - notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
>
> MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
Noted. Jira CXF-298.
> once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> apache
I'm curious about this. If you look at the org/apache section of the maven2
repository (the public one where all the top level releases go), NOTHING is
prefixed with apache. The only one that is close is apacheds. How can it
be a requirement of a TLP if only a single TLP does it? Isn't having them
in "org/apache" sufficient?
> the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> before this policy is adopted.
>
> perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started section
Noted as JIRA issue CXF-299 to fix for m2. That said, a link is right on
our home page which IS in the README.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Bo,
Don't forget the tip from paul:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=116577422312412&w=2
Basically review what the Qpid guys did for the JMS disclaimers and
add the same for JAX-WS and JSR-181
thanks,
-- dims
On 12/11/06, Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com> wrote:
>
> > Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
> > now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
> > undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
> >
> OK, I just woke up and the javadoc jars distribution are removed now.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
> Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
> now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
> undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
>
OK, I just woke up and the javadoc jars distribution are removed now.
Cheers,
Bo
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
> Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
> now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
> undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
>
OK, I just woke up and the javadoc jars distribution are removed now.
Cheers,
Bo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> On 12/7/06, robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of
> > the
> > > follow options and get your +1?
> > > 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar
> > > 2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to
> > our
> > > wishes
> > > 3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses
> >
> > any of these sound fine
> >
> >
> Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
> now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
> undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
>
> If we decide we need to distribute them we can create a separate VOTE for
> the javadoc jars. Otherwise we'll just fix them our next release when
> hopefully the maven plugin will be working...
>
> With that caveat can we get an official +1? ;-)
certainly: here's my +1
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
On 12/7/06, robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of
> the
> > follow options and get your +1?
> > 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar
> > 2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to
> our
> > wishes
> > 3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses
>
> any of these sound fine
>
>
Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
If we decide we need to distribute them we can create a separate VOTE for
the javadoc jars. Otherwise we'll just fix them our next release when
hopefully the maven plugin will be working...
With that caveat can we get an official +1? ;-)
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
On 12/7/06, robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of
> the
> > follow options and get your +1?
> > 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar
> > 2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to
> our
> > wishes
> > 3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses
>
> any of these sound fine
>
>
Alright, then I think we should just not distribute the javadoc jars for
now. Given that its in Bo's directory, I can't delete them and he's
undoubtedly asleep for a few more hours :-).
If we decide we need to distribute them we can create a separate VOTE for
the javadoc jars. Otherwise we'll just fix them our next release when
hopefully the maven plugin will be working...
With that caveat can we get an official +1? ;-)
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> - questions -
> >
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar
> > is missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore
> > be distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if
> > yes then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
>
>
> I could be wrong here, but after a quick investigation, it appears we hit a
> limitation/bug of Maven's javadoc plugin. All the others turned out fine,
> but for API we tweaked some of the javadoc parameters it looks like, so
> maybe this affected things.
>
> As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of the
> follow options and get your +1?
> 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar
> 2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to our
> wishes
> 3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses
any of these sound fine
> - notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
> >
> > MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> > place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> > Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> > Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> > AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
>
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-298
>
> once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> > apache
>
>
> As in apache-cxf-api-2.0.jar?
yep
> the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> > non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> > (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> > there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> > before this policy is adopted.
>
>
> OK, we've already brought up these licenses on the legal list, but haven't
> heard anything back yet.
yeh - just a FYI
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
Hi Robert,
- questions -
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar
> is missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore
> be distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if
> yes then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
I could be wrong here, but after a quick investigation, it appears we hit a
limitation/bug of Maven's javadoc plugin. All the others turned out fine,
but for API we tweaked some of the javadoc parameters it looks like, so
maybe this affected things.
As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of the
follow options and get your +1?
1. Not distribute the javadoc jar
2. Recut just that jar after figuring out how to make Maven comply to our
wishes
3. Update the JAR by hand to include the appropate licenses
- notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
>
> MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
> place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
> Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
> Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
> AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-298
once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with
> apache
As in apache-cxf-api-2.0.jar?
the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
> non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
> (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
> there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
> before this policy is adopted.
OK, we've already brought up these licenses on the legal list, but haven't
heard anything back yet.
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
> Release notes: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
+0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
- questions -
http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar
is missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore
be distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if
yes then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
- notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with apache
the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
(http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
before this policy is adopted.
perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started section
- robert
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
> Release notes: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Willem Jiang <ni...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Dec 4, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
+1
Looks good from an "administrative" aspect was well
as a functional one :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 12/4/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
> Release notes: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
+0 (hopefully soon to be +1 once the question below is resolved
- questions -
http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-api/2.0-incubator-M1/cxf-api-2.0-incubator-M1-javadoc.jar
is missing license, disclaimer and notice files. it cannot therefore
be distributed. planning to distribute this jar from a repository? (if
yes then IMHO the release needs recutting, if no it's fine)
- notes, comments and suggestions (not requirements) -
MANIFEST's are a little empty. sun recommends quite a list in one
place or another (Extension-Name, Specification-Title,
Specification-Vendor, Specification-Version, Implementation-Vendor-Id,
Implementation-Title, Implementation-Vendor, Implementation-Version).
AIUI maven will generate these if asked.
once cxf graduates, remember that all artifacts need to be prefixed with apache
the source contains some xml specifications that are licensed under
non-open source licenses (copy and distribution only). it is proposed
(http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) that this is against policy.
there is still time to join in the discussions (on legal-discuss)
before this policy is adopted.
perhaps add link to issue tracking system to the README get started section
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Dec 4, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
+1
Looks good from an "administrative" aspect was well
as a functional one :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Peter Jones <pe...@iona.com>.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> [...]
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
+1
Cheers,
Peter
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
--
Peter Jones
IONA Technologies Inc.
E-Mail: mailto:peter.jones@iona.com
Tel: (w) 709-738-3725 x22 | Fax: 709-738-3745
84-86 Elizabeth Ave. St. John's, NL A1A 1W7 Canada
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
+1
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
+1
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/repository/org/apache/cxf>
>
> Release notes:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+Release+Notes
>
>
>
> (NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc.
> While
> this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
> the directory name...)
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
> candidates and this one!
>
> - The CXF team
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Jim Ma <ji...@iona.com>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 4:52 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
>
>
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://peo
ple.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/
org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/reposi
tory/org/apache/cxf>
Release notes:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+
Release+Notes
(NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
the directory name...)
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
candidates and this one!
- The CXF team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
Posted by Jim Ma <ji...@iona.com>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 4:52 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)
>
>
> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
> previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other
> issues, we've cut a new build and published it here:
>
> Binaries and Source Distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/<http://peo
ple.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/>
> Maven Repository:
> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/repository/
org/apache/cxf/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/reposi
tory/org/apache/cxf>
Release notes:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Apache+CXF+2.0-M1+Incubating+
Release+Notes
(NOTE: we just started labelling the different releases as v1/v2/etc. While
this is our 3rd attempt, the above says v2 as we just started counting in
the directory name...)
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
Thanks for everyone who has helped so far with the previous release
candidates and this one!
- The CXF team