You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Ralph Seichter <sp...@sentries.org> on 2005/10/02 14:37:59 UTC

Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

Hi,

first I want to thank you for keeping up all the good work and
updating the rule files. Unfortunately, some of the PGP signatures
don't seem to match their rule files (i.e. 70_sare_genlsubj.cf.sig,
70_sare_header.cf.sig), and Matt's Key 0x1129F0D3 used for signing
evilnumbers.cf has expired.

Could you please check/renew the signatures? Thanks.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

Posted by Ralph Seichter <sp...@sentries.org>.
Matt Yackley wrote:

 > EvilnumX.cf .sig files should be update shortly.

I see these results:

$ gpg --verify 70_sare_evilnum0.cf.sig
gpg: Signature made Tue 04 Oct 2005 04:01:25 AM CEST using DSA key ID 1129F0D3
gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Yackley (SpamAssassin Rules Emporium) <fo...@domain.tld>"

$ gpg --verify 70_sare_evilnum1.cf.sig
gpg: Signature made Tue 04 Oct 2005 04:02:22 AM CEST using DSA key ID 1129F0D3
gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Yackley (SpamAssassin Rules Emporium) <fo...@domain.tld>"

$ gpg --verify 70_sare_evilnum2.cf.sig
gpg: Signature made Tue 04 Oct 2005 04:02:46 AM CEST using DSA key ID 1129F0D3
gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Yackley (SpamAssassin Rules Emporium) <fo...@domain.tld>"

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

Posted by Matt Yackley <sa...@yackley.org>.
Ralph Seichter said:
> Hi,
>
> first I want to thank you for keeping up all the good work and
> updating the rule files. Unfortunately, some of the PGP signatures
> don't seem to match their rule files (i.e. 70_sare_genlsubj.cf.sig,
> 70_sare_header.cf.sig), and Matt's Key 0x1129F0D3 used for signing
> evilnumbers.cf has expired.
>
> Could you please check/renew the signatures? Thanks.
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
> Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter
>
>

EvilnumX.cf .sig files should be update shortly.


Cheers,

matt

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

Posted by Ralph Seichter <sp...@sentries.org>.
Robert Menschel wrote:

 > New signature files should be in distribution within the hour.

I did not check all signatures because I don't use all SARE rule sets,
but there is still at least one "bad" signature:

   $ gpg --verify 70_sare_obfu.cf.sig
   gpg: Signature made Sun 02 Oct 2005 04:31:30 AM CEST using DSA key
        ID 38AA1D47
   gpg: BAD signature from "Robert Menschel <Ro...@menschel.net>"

Other signatures like 70_sare_html.cf.sig which were created with the
same key 0x38AA1D47 are reported as being "good".

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

Posted by Robert Menschel <Ro...@Menschel.net>.
Hello Ralph,

Sunday, October 2, 2005, 5:37:59 AM, you wrote:

RS> first I want to thank you for keeping up all the good work and
RS> updating the rule files. Unfortunately, some of the PGP signatures
RS> don't seem to match their rule files (i.e. 70_sare_genlsubj.cf.sig,
RS> 70_sare_header.cf.sig), and Matt's Key 0x1129F0D3 used for signing
RS> evilnumbers.cf has expired.

RS> Could you please check/renew the signatures? Thanks.

Done.  New signature files should be in distribution within the hour.

Bob Menschel