Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

+1 too.

Then, should we use a name like "hama-graph"? or to emphasize the
Pregel-clone, should it have own name?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> agreed, and this can be part of the planned separation between core and
> examples code.
> I can take care of that but I want to be sure the release we just made has
> reached Maven Central so that such changes happen from
> 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT onwards.
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/7/28 ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>
>
>> +1
>>
>> This seems better to minimize dependency.
>>
>> -----Original message-----
>> From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900
>> Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core
>>
>> I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here.
>>
>> 2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
>> > Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph?
>> > Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate
>> the
>> > build process.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Miklos
>> >
>> > On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > That's great.
>> >
>> > BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core?
>> >
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > hey all,
>> >
>> > what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with
>> HAMA-409
>> > from the Hama Core stuff?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> > Berlin
>> >
>> > mobile: 0170-3081070
>> >
>> > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
>> > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>>
>> --
>> ChiaHung Lin
>> Department of Information Management
>> National University of Kaohsiung
>> Taiwan
>>
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon