[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-5601) Window operator does not checkpoint watermarks

["Flink Jira Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-5601:
----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned pull-request-available stale-minor  (was: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned pull-request-available)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Window operator does not checkpoint watermarks
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5601
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.9.0, 1.10.0, 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, auto-unassigned, pull-request-available, stale-minor
>
> During release testing [~stefanrichter83@gmail.com] and I noticed that watermarks are not checkpointed in the window operator.
> This can lead to non determinism when restoring checkpoints. I was running an adjusted {{SessionWindowITCase}} via Kafka for testing migration and rescaling and ran into failures, because the data generator required determinisitic behaviour.
> What happened was that on restore it could happen that late elements were not dropped, because the watermarks needed to be re-established after restore first.
> [~aljoscha] Do you know whether there is a special reason for explicitly not checkpointing watermarks?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)