Bundles w/ sealed packages and split packages

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

I'm trying to grok what happens to bundles that have sealed packages  
which get "extended" via the split package mechanism.  The spec  
doesn't seem to address this situation; maybe it does and I missed it.

Can someone explain what should happen?


Regards,
Alan

Re: Bundles w/ sealed packages and split packages

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

On Aug 10, 2007, at 9:21 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:

> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> I'm trying to grok what happens to bundles that have sealed  
>> packages which get "extended" via the split package mechanism.   
>> The spec doesn't seem to address this situation; maybe it does and  
>> I missed it.
>>
>> Can someone explain what should happen?
>
> Just speaking off the top of my head, I would say sealed packages  
> are ignored in that case...at least I believe they are in Felix.

Seems reasonable to me.  Odd that the spec is quiet about that.  IMO,  
it should at least spout out a warning.


Regards,
Alan

Re: Bundles w/ sealed packages and split packages

["Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>]

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm trying to grok what happens to bundles that have sealed packages 
> which get "extended" via the split package mechanism.  The spec 
> doesn't seem to address this situation; maybe it does and I missed it.
>
> Can someone explain what should happen?

Just speaking off the top of my head, I would say sealed packages are 
ignored in that case...at least I believe they are in Felix.

-> richard
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>