You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by Robert Matthews <rm...@nakedobjects.org> on 2010/11/17 16:21:08 UTC
Java version
Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
Rob
Re: Java version
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
Yes, should be ok to do everything.
On 17/11/2010 18:38, Robert Matthews wrote:
> Is it alright to update everything? I take it you're just being
> specific and it not a problem.
>
>
> On 17/11/10 18:34, Dan Haywood wrote:'
>> ok, fixed. Just do an update of viewer/bdd/pom.xml
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/2010 18:24, Robert Matthews wrote:
>>> On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>>>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited
>>>> internet access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>>> Having changed to it works with 1.6.0-11 it is building.
>>>
>>> It nows fails building the fitnesse project as it can't find a jar,
>>> specifically:
>>>
>>> Downloading:
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/fitnesse/fitnesse/20101101/fitnesse-20101101.pom
>>>
>>> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.fitnesse:fitnesse:pom:20101101'
>>> in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>>>
>>> (and for all the other repos). Actually it isn't there!
>>>
>>> Where did expect to get it from.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Java version
Posted by Robert Matthews <rm...@nakedobjects.org>.
Is it alright to update everything? I take it you're just being specific
and it not a problem.
On 17/11/10 18:34, Dan Haywood wrote:'
> ok, fixed. Just do an update of viewer/bdd/pom.xml
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 17/11/2010 18:24, Robert Matthews wrote:
>> On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited
>>> internet access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>> Having changed to it works with 1.6.0-11 it is building.
>>
>> It nows fails building the fitnesse project as it can't find a jar,
>> specifically:
>>
>> Downloading:
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/fitnesse/fitnesse/20101101/fitnesse-20101101.pom
>>
>> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.fitnesse:fitnesse:pom:20101101'
>> in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>>
>> (and for all the other repos). Actually it isn't there!
>>
>> Where did expect to get it from.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Java version
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
ok, fixed. Just do an update of viewer/bdd/pom.xml
Dan
On 17/11/2010 18:24, Robert Matthews wrote:
> On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited
>> internet access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
> Having changed to it works with 1.6.0-11 it is building.
>
> It nows fails building the fitnesse project as it can't find a jar,
> specifically:
>
> Downloading:
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/fitnesse/fitnesse/20101101/fitnesse-20101101.pom
> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.fitnesse:fitnesse:pom:20101101' in
> repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>
> (and for all the other repos). Actually it isn't there!
>
> Where did expect to get it from.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
Re: Java version
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
oops. I meant to uncomment that from the BDD aggregator project. Let
me do so now.
On 17/11/2010 18:24, Robert Matthews wrote:
> On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited
>> internet access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
> Having changed to it works with 1.6.0-11 it is building.
>
> It nows fails building the fitnesse project as it can't find a jar,
> specifically:
>
> Downloading:
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/fitnesse/fitnesse/20101101/fitnesse-20101101.pom
> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.fitnesse:fitnesse:pom:20101101' in
> repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>
> (and for all the other repos). Actually it isn't there!
>
> Where did expect to get it from.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
Re: Java version
Posted by Robert Matthews <rm...@nakedobjects.org>.
On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
> access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
Having changed to it works with 1.6.0-11 it is building.
It nows fails building the fitnesse project as it can't find a jar,
specifically:
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/fitnesse/fitnesse/20101101/fitnesse-20101101.pom
[INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.fitnesse:fitnesse:pom:20101101' in
repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
(and for all the other repos). Actually it isn't there!
Where did expect to get it from.
Rob
Re: Java version
Posted by Robert Matthews <rm...@nakedobjects.org>.
On 17/11/10 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
> access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>
> Rob
FYI: with the current source code both bulds (as described on the wiki)
work.
Re: Java version
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
No, we figured out Kevin's problem, which had nothing to do with Java
versions... it was something to do with carriage returns when spawning
off Javadoc (see rev 1031143)
... as I say, the only reason we have 1.6.0_21 defined is that it was
the version that was on my computer, and my computer was performing the
build whereas his wasn't.
Cheers
Dan
On 17/11/2010 16:01, James Carman wrote:
> Is 1.6.0_21 the first one with "Oracle" in the name? Perhaps that causes it?
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dan Haywood<dk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> None that I know of.
>>
>> I put in the enforcer plugin when we were trying to track down Kevin's site
>> build problems... it was just the JVM that I had on my machine that was
>> working.
>>
>> I suspect you could safely move back to an earlier version, at least
>> temporarily.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/2010 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
>>> access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
Re: Java version
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Is 1.6.0_21 the first one with "Oracle" in the name? Perhaps that causes it?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> None that I know of.
>
> I put in the enforcer plugin when we were trying to track down Kevin's site
> build problems... it was just the JVM that I had on my machine that was
> working.
>
> I suspect you could safely move back to an earlier version, at least
> temporarily.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On 17/11/2010 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
>>
>> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
>> access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>
Re: Java version
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
None that I know of.
I put in the enforcer plugin when we were trying to track down Kevin's
site build problems... it was just the JVM that I had on my machine that
was working.
I suspect you could safely move back to an earlier version, at least
temporarily.
Dan
On 17/11/2010 15:21, Robert Matthews wrote:
> Are there problems with Java prior to 1.6.0-21? I've limited internet
> access at the moment and can't build as I'm out of date.
>
> Rob
>