You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "benwtrent (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/04/02 20:30:45 UTC

Re: [PR] OptimisticKnnVectorQuery [lucene]

benwtrent commented on PR #14226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14226#issuecomment-2773659852

   @dungba88 @msokolov 
   
   Do we know where we stand with this? I wonder if we should simply use this to replace the current buggy behavior as fanning out to segments multiple times with sane sync points should fix our consistency issues and if the performance of this is on-par with the current information sharing logic, seems like a net-win.
   
   Anything I can do to help here?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org