Release Was: [lang] Builders complete?

[Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>]

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:

> No one had volunteered yet.

I'm happy to. Had been giving everyone time to play with builders as they
weren't something I had a great itch for.

There are a lot of things we have on the post-release list, and Stephen's
got a good thing going in the STATUS.html to show post release ideas. I
suggest we all continue to add issues and ideas to that to signify things
we itch/care about, such as your introspection Steven.

Daniel's volunteered to handle the actual CVS whatnot. Tagging and
branching and whittling into shape, so it seems our process is:

1) Decide on what we want to go and what doesn't go.
2) All agree that we're happy with the state of what is going, including
   javadoc and unit tests.
3) Make a preliminery build available internally. I'd like to then run
   JDiff on this with the beta. This hopefully can make us aware of any
   issues. This means having tag stuff in cvs done at this point.
4) Propose a vote for a 1.0 release.
5) Worry about the website. I doubt we'll be doing a lot in the way of
   tutorials or docs etc, but we need to make sure the simple bits we have
   there are good.
6) Ensure we are in Bugzilla. I'm not sure if we are yet.
7) Release.

Does this sound right to everyone?

Hen


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: Release Was: [lang] Builders complete?

[Steven Caswell <st...@caswell.name>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Downey [mailto:steve.downey@netfolio.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:15 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Release Was: [lang] Builders complete?
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:21 am, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> > > No one had volunteered yet.
> >
> > I'm happy to. Had been giving everyone time to play with 
> builders as 
> > they weren't something I had a great itch for.
> >
> > There are a lot of things we have on the post-release list, and 
> > Stephen's got a good thing going in the STATUS.html to show post 
> > release ideas. I suggest we all continue to add issues and ideas to 
> > that to signify things we itch/care about, such as your 
> introspection 
> > Steven.
> It's Steve who's got the introspection itch. Steven will have 
> to scratch his 
> own itches. <g>

+1 :)

Steven Caswell
steven@caswell.name
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
"One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Ste[vp]h?en? Was: Release

[Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>]

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:

> It's Steve who's got the introspection itch. Steven will have to scratch his
> own itches. <g>

As you may have noticed, I'm not using first names starting with S
anymore. It hurts my head.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Release Was: [lang] Builders complete?

[Steve Downey <st...@netfolio.com>]

On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:21 am, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> > No one had volunteered yet.
>
> I'm happy to. Had been giving everyone time to play with builders as they
> weren't something I had a great itch for.
>
> There are a lot of things we have on the post-release list, and Stephen's
> got a good thing going in the STATUS.html to show post release ideas. I
> suggest we all continue to add issues and ideas to that to signify things
> we itch/care about, such as your introspection Steven.
It's Steve who's got the introspection itch. Steven will have to scratch his 
own itches. <g>

>
> Daniel's volunteered to handle the actual CVS whatnot. Tagging and
> branching and whittling into shape, so it seems our process is:
>
> 1) Decide on what we want to go and what doesn't go.
What's there now + Steven's planned fixes for exceptions?

> 2) All agree that we're happy with the state of what is going, including
>    javadoc and unit tests.

There's work to be done on the javadocs. Nothing crippling, but it could be 
better. The unit tests seem to be pretty good, though.

> 3) Make a preliminery build available internally. I'd like to then run
>    JDiff on this with the beta. This hopefully can make us aware of any
>    issues. This means having tag stuff in cvs done at this point.
> 4) Propose a vote for a 1.0 release.
> 5) Worry about the website. I doubt we'll be doing a lot in the way of
>    tutorials or docs etc, but we need to make sure the simple bits we have
>    there are good.
> 6) Ensure we are in Bugzilla. I'm not sure if we are yet.
> 7) Release.
>
> Does this sound right to everyone?
>
> Hen

Sounds good to me.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>